Jump to content

Opinions that didn't age well: 2023


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

Even though the O'Hearn move worked out, Roch's "A left-handed bat for first base and the corner outfield. Check" tweet is still so ridiculous to me. 

The biggest thing I remember being way wrong about this year was that I thought Mateo's breakout was real. I remember writing that his April was so good, it seemed more likely to be a Mullins-type breakthrough than a random hot streak. It turns out a better recent Orioles comparison would be Tim Beckham's first month with the team. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we’d see more prospects given more time.  Some of that was guys like Frazier but some of it was solid health on the roster.

Gunnar and Grayson’s early struggles may have slowed the team integration plan.  They eventually righted their ship big time.  We also saw Westburg get solid time in the second half.  Cowser, Stowers, Ortiz, and (to a lesser extent) HK barely saw any time.

I figured we would be a top 10 offense.  But thought middle of the pack pitching.

Have we/fans learned anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

Even though the O'Hearn move worked out, Roch's "A left-handed bat for first base and the corner outfield. Check" tweet is still so ridiculous to me. 

The biggest thing I remember being way wrong about this year was that I thought Mateo's breakout was real. I remember writing that his April was so good, it seemed more likely to be a Mullins-type breakthrough than a random hot streak. It turns out a better recent Orioles comparison would be Tim Beckham's first month with the team. 

Same here on Mateo.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Out of 96 posters who responded to a May 1 poll, only one answered that Mateo would finish with an OPS under .700.   Congratulations, @Sports Guy.

 I’ve literally never seen a player go from that hot to that cold from one month to the next.  

I also said his defense wouldn’t be at the level he showed in 2022.

Im not really sure why so many on here get fooled so quickly by new shiny things.

The history of a players career matters. Hoping that every crappy toolsy player will buck history and because Jose Bautista is funny to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Out of 96 posters who responded to a May 1 poll, only one answered that Mateo would finish with an OPS under .700.   Congratulations, @Sports Guy.

 I’ve literally never seen a player go from that hot to that cold from one month to the next.  

I might be wrong, but wasn't his start to the year so hot that if he performed to career norms the rest of the way he'd have been over .700?

He would have had to have gone from hitting better than ever before to worse than ever before over the course of a single year. I don't blame people for not seeing that, but kudos to Sports Guy anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Out of 96 posters who responded to a May 1 poll, only one answered that Mateo would finish with an OPS under .700.   Congratulations, @Sports Guy.

 I’ve literally never seen a player go from that hot to that cold from one month to the next.  

“For whatever it’s worth, ZiPS now projects Mateo’s final OPS at .768, which includes his 1.062 to date, and .711 for the rest of the season“

He had OPS’d ~.650 for his career up to 2023.  I don’t think anyone could have reasonably expected him to be historically bad AND continue to get ABs.  
 

If I remember correctly, I thought he’d fall off significantly but stop getting ABs before his OPS dropped below .700.  Pretty incredible how terrible he was after the hot start and that they kept giving him ABs. 

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

I might be wrong, but wasn't his start to the year so hot that if he performed to career norms the rest of the way he'd have been over .700?

He would have had to have gone from hitting better than ever before to worse than ever before over the course of a single year. I don't blame people for not seeing that, but kudos to Sports Guy anyway.

Thats correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think this matters. I think you get value where you can. The Rays have been willing trade partners in the past when it was clear they weren’t contending. Right now they are 4 games out of the last slot but have like 5 teams above them. Can they get it? Sure but it’s not that likely and in the past they’ve been realistic in their down type seasons.
    • I think Norby is going to be a very good MLB offensive player. I’m ok trading him but not for 1/2 season rental types.
    • Yeah I think they need to staggar the lefties in the rotation order. R-R-L-R-L like that.
    • Trading Mayo Kjerstad and Povich for one guy to become a relief pitcher is nuts.
    • We don't need starting pitchers. We need Relief Pitchers. We don't need average Relief Pitchers, we need consistent high leverage/high K Relief Pitchers.
    • If you feel comfortable putting Aiken and Baker (or even Tate) in during an elimination series, that's your prerogative. But I do not. Too inconsistent, which is the same reason why Mike Baumann pitched himself off the active roster. when spot was needed for returning starters off the IL. Currently Coulombe is on IL so we can't even count on one of our best. Cano has regressed from last season. We've also witnessed last season how Webb broke down from over use and was ineffective in the playoff series against Texas. Perez goes in streaks of either really good or concernedly bad (he loses his command). Akin's problem is he leaves the ball over the heart of the plate and he doesn't have good enough stuff to get away with it. They're meatballs. We might get some good times from Baker now that he's up, but I would only expect a month or 2 at best from him before he returns to old habits. And Suarez is a starter who wants to be a starter. Who knows if he will go back to the bullpen? He'll have to go deeper into games if he wants to stay in the rotation, otherwise, I think he should be in the bullpen. But that's not what he is right now in this moment. He's a starter with a ERA in the 1s.
    • It's pretty hard to say definitively that the bolded is true.  It might be, but there's also the loss in ability you have to account for.  30 year olds are slower than 26 year olds too.  Maybe their game knowledge and practice have made it so they can overcome the meager loss in bat speed/athleticism over that time span.  But the picture is a bit muddy.   I also don't think the aging issue is limited to people in their mid-late 30s.  Bat speed peaks at like 24 or 25 based on the data we have right now on it, and after 31 starts falling off fairly fast.  Obviously this is population data and individuals are likely to see different curves.   But outside of the stars that have a lot of ability to lose, it's becoming pretty clear that once you hit your early 30s it's pretty hard to maintain your skills without all the "help" that is extensively tested for.   I think that even for early-30s players teams are much more willing to drop them over giving them expensive market-rate deals, especially since they can abuse young talent so readily.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...