Jump to content

Who begins the season as our "regular" 2B?


Greg Pappas

Who begins the season as our "regular" 2B?  

104 members have voted

  1. 1. Who begins the season as our "regular" 2B?



Recommended Posts

I'll go Holliday for funsies. 

It's probably Westburg, but then there's kind of an odd hole at 3B. Gunnar will be the SS, but I don't know that they want to start Urias at 3B most days. I don't think Mayo is defensively ready to be the full time 3B. Ortiz is more of a SS, so that's also kind of weird. I'm sure he could handle 3B, but is he a starter offensively right now? I don't know. 

Holliday fixes all of that. You just slide Westburg over to third and everyone feels pretty slotted in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am assuming Holliday is unlikely to make the opening day roster, and Norby is also not on the 40-man and even less likely to make the team IMO. 

Could be any of the others but I think if Ortiz makes the team it is most likely as SS/3B. 

That leaves Westburg and Urias. I would lean toward Westburg, both because I think Urias could be traded, and also because 3B is Urias's best position and 2B is Westburg's. I would go with Westburg but with low confidence.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started the thread because there are many possibilities and no certainties.  I agree that Holliday most likely begins in AAA.  I also believe Ortiz will make the team and start, either at SS or 2B.  IMHO, the best lineup we can put together before Holliday's call up would be Gunnar at 3B, Ortiz at SS, and Westy at 2B.  From my vantage point, Ortiz seems pivotal.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

I started the thread because there are many possibilities and no certainties.  I agree that Holliday most likely begins in AAA.  I also believe Ortiz will make the team and start, either at SS or 2B.  IMHO, the best lineup we can put together before Holliday's call up would be Gunnar at 3B, Ortiz at SS, and Westy at 2B.  From my vantage point, Ortiz seems pivotal.

Elias on Ortiz back in July:

“We love Joey Ortiz, we love having him as part of our future. I think he's going to have a long future as a starting shortstop, and here is the most likely place.”

So - you may be onto something. That could be Elias talking up his own prospect/asset, or it could be another case of Elias telling us exactly what's going to happen. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless he's traded, it's almost certainly Westburg. Holliday is the dark horse.

If Westburg goes, then it might be Ortiz.

I just don't see it with Urias/Norby unless Elias thinks Holliday really needs more AAA time and Westburg and Ortiz are gone or hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only Holliday is a LHH.  Once he's up, he's the priority play with the same long leash Gunnar had.  How big of a factor does being a LHH play in time management decisions?  I don't think it's enough to counter the extra year of team control.

I think Norby is buried another year or traded (or OF) because that's the agreed upon rules of engagement.

That leaves Westburg, Urias, and Ortiz...

In my best dreams, Holliday is the OD 2B.  And Urias/Mateo are traded for prospects with Westburg as the 3B and Ortiz as the UTIL.

In my next best dreams, Ortiz is the SS and Gunnar is 3B, with Westburg at 2B.  It would be a fairly bold move to push Gunnar off SS even if it's not full-time though.

In reality, I think Westburg or Ortiz is traded.  Either way, that would put Urias getting the bulk of 2B reps.  If Westburg is dealt, Gunnar is the primary 3B and Ortiz is SS.  If Ortiz is dealt, then Westburg is 3B with Gunnar at SS.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe it was Roch the other day that mentioned that Mayo was being blocked at 3B by Gunnar and Westburg.  That raised a lot of questions about where all of these guys will line up, didn't it?   Makes it difficult to answer this poll with any degree of certainty.  🙂  It is a good "problem" to have, though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, oriole said:

I hope it’s Holliday at 2B, Westburg at 3B and Urias is off the roster. Otherwise, it’s highly likely to be Westburg at 2B and Urias at 3B.

Only way Urias is off the roster is if he's traded. Hopefully Elias can work a trade with the Marlins that sends off Urias or Mateo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Greg Pappas said:

I started the thread because there are many possibilities and no certainties.  I agree that Holliday most likely begins in AAA.  I also believe Ortiz will make the team and start, either at SS or 2B.  IMHO, the best lineup we can put together before Holliday's call up would be Gunnar at 3B, Ortiz at SS, and Westy at 2B.  From my vantage point, Ortiz seems pivotal.

Greg, don't you believe that Gunnar is the big dog.  Because of his production and his desire to play mostly SS, won't it to hard be move him off SS?

I think we may see Ortiz 3B, Gunnar SS and Westburg at 2B if no one is traded.  2B is Westburg best defensive position.   Ortiz from what I hear will be very good at any of 3B/SS/2B.  To be good at 3B the player needs great reflexes.   Ortiz has that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Greg, don't you believe that Gunnar is the big dog.  Because of his production and his desire to play mostly SS, won't it to hard be move him off SS?

I think we may see Ortiz 3B, Gunnar SS and Westburg at 2B if no one is traded.  2B is Westburg best defensive position.   Ortiz from what I hear will be very good at any of 3B/SS/2B.  To be good at 3B the player needs great reflexes.   Ortiz has that.

The big dog?

Heh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need more offensive power production from the 3B position than what Urias, Ortiz, and Westburg have shown.   2022 Urias was okay,  but the 2023 version of all these guys leaves much to be desired.   1B and 3B need to have a bat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's fine, but I would personally prefer having Cowser and Adley taking tons of pitches back-to-back before Gunnar further punishes the opposing starting pitcher with high exit velo barrels. 
    • I was going to say pretty much the same thing about Cowser in my post, but left out my thoughts to keep the post more Gunnar-centric. But I totally agree that Cowser fits the best as this team's leadoff hitter, especially since Holliday doesn't look like he's going to make an impact offensively as early as most of us thought heading into the season.  Going back to last season, I've said Cowser has the best mix of patience, hit tool, power, and speed to be a great leadoff hitter. The strikeouts are most likely always going to be high with him, but he has .380-.400+ OBP makeup, and having someone like that hitting leadoff with Adley and Gunnar hitting directly behind Cowser is going to set things up for an elite offense which is much more dynamic and less one-dimensional than the what we've seen up until this point. Cowser Adley Gunnar Westburg O'Hearn Santander Mountcastle Is an ideal top 7 against RHP for right now, with Kjerstad (replacing Hays) and Mayo (essentially replacing Mateo and bumping Westburg to 2B) making the lineup legitimately scary within the next couple months. Mullins and Hays need to be phased out, with Santander and Mountcastle not far behind if those two continue struggling and not reaching base enough to justify hitting in the middle of the order.
    • A lot of teams (likely driven by analytics) are putting their best overall hitter at 2 (like the Yankees batting Soto 2, and the Dodgers batting Shohei 2) to maximize ABs while guaranteeing that a high-OBP guy is batting in front of him to give him opportunities with men on base.  That's probably what we want.  It seems logical considering how thoroughly debunked small-ball in the first inning has been.  Rutschman at 3 is fine.
    • Realistically I think Adley as the leadoff guy is the best lineup for us but if he has trouble batting leadoff in half the games because he can't get his catcher's gear off fast enough then I get it.   Cowser has continued to be incredibly patient, and if Adley can't be our leadoff guy then Cowser is probably our next best option.  Of course Cowser also hits a lot of bombs, so it'd be interesting if he goes on another heater.   If Cowser gets off the schneid then Cowser leadoff and Gunnar at 2 could be incredibly potent.  I don't think Cowser is actually playing that badly, he's just been running into some bad luck.  And he's starting to wake up a little bit anyway.
    • Agreed, appreciate the stats. Gunnar isn't a leadoff hitter - he's a prototypical #3 hitter or cleanup hitter. Hyde writes poor lineups, and Gunnar hitting leadoff has been one of the consistent problems with the offense this season. Gunnar hitting mostly solo shots is both a consequence and reflection of this offense's flaws - the O's have too many low-OBP hitters in the lineup (hitting in less-than-optimal spots for the most part) and are too reliant on solo homers to generate runs. At least Hyde has started hitting Westburg leadoff against LHP, which is progress, but Hyde is way too stubborn and too slow to make the correct adjustments. He's very similar to Buck Showalter in that respect.  Anyway, I look forward to Hyde waking up and moving Gunnar down to #3/#4 against RHP.  
    • While the return on the Tettleton trade wasn't ideal, 1: I don't think you can really expect a 30 year old catcher to put up a career year and then follow it up with another one, and 2: we had Chris Hoiles who played quite well for us following Tettleton's departure.  If we had forward thinking GMs we probably would split them at C and give them DH/1B/OF games on their non catching days, which is what Detroit did with Tettleton to prolong his career after 1992.  (He was basically the same hitter from 1993-1995 but he stopped catching with regularity so his WAR was much lower.)   The Davis trade was so completely undefensible on every level, not the least of which because we already had a player who was at least as good as Davis was on the team, but he didn't fit the stereotypical batting profile of a 1B.  At least today teams wouldn't be so quick to dismiss a 10 HR first baseman if he's got an OBP of .400.
    • The Glenn Davis trade was so bad it overshadowed another really bad trade in team history. The Orioles traded Mickey Tettleton that same offseason for Jeff Robinson in part because Tettleton had an off year in 1990 with a .223 batting average and a .381 slugging percentage. Except Tettleton drew 116 walks making his OBP .376 and his OPS+ was 116. Jeff Robinson was coming off a 5.96 ERA in 145 innings pitched. I have no idea what the team was thinking with this trade. Robinson did manage to lower his ERA in 1991 to 5.18 his only Orioles season. There's no way this trade is made today in the age of analytics. Tettleton meanwhile put up 171 home runs and an .859 OPS for the remainder of his career. 😬 Just a bad trade that doesn't get talked about enough thanks to Glenn Davis.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...