Jump to content

Fangraphs hates our rotation


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Satyr3206 said:

I am not against trades. Just lopsided ones.

Gotcha... unfortunately it seems as though any trade will be rough on the surface. I think in a few years it will look better, that's if a trade happens. Very rarely will a trade work out as bad as the Davis trade back in the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Another very good point.  I mentioned the Steamer/ZiPS thing in another context relating to the O’s W/L projections the other day.  The bottom line is, there’s a ton of variability in any of these projections, to the point where they’re almost valueless.  I look at them for entertainment value (and often post comparisons of them) but don’t have much confidence in any of them. 

With the amount of variance that goes into a team’s record at the end of the year, the confidence level you can put in the preseason team win projections is pretty much just this: in any given year, there’s about 4-6 teams we can be confident will be pretty good (and sometimes they go 2023 Mets), and there’s about 4-6 teams we can be confident will be pretty bad (and sometimes they go 2012 Orioles), and otherwise every other team could be good or bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

All due respect, I don't know if we were watching the same guy. While he managed to gut through his starts with a good ERA, his strikeout rate was down like 4 per 9 from 2022, and he just didn't miss any bats with the changeup. He looked fine overall for a guy coming back from TJS, but to say he looked exactly the same is just plain wrong. It wasn't the same devastating changeup, and he wiggled out of some starts. His hits per 9 was also way down, which is good, but probably means he was lucky when you combine that with the lack of Ks.

All that said, it was only 22 innings, so it's not like the lack of Ks and missed bats means much of anything. But visually, no, he absolutely did not look exactly the same. I am fairly comfortable saying he'll look more like himself in 2024.

I'm not sure we can accurately access a pitcher four games back after TJ surgery. Let me see what he looks like this year. Saying that, I agree that he can't just be penciled in for 32 starts and 180 innings of classic Means work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm not sure we can accurately access a pitcher four games back after TJ surgery. Let me see what he looks like this year. Saying that, I agree that he can't just be penciled in for 32 starts and 180 innings of classic Means work. 

His career high (ML) in starts is 27 and innings is 155.  I don't think it would be sensible to assume he'd surpass those numbers in 2024.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, dystopia said:

The Rangers projection might be an even bigger joke than the one for the O's. 

Why?  They won 90 last year.  These estimates are based on the team right now.  As of right now they don't have DeGrom for the year, Sherzer will be out half the year, they haven't resigned Montgomery and their one starting pitcher signing, Mahle, will be out at least the first half of the year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

Why?  They won 90 last year.  These estimates are based on the team right now.  As of right now they don't have DeGrom for the year, Sherzer will be out half the year, they haven't resigned Montgomery and their one starting pitcher signing, Mahle, will be out at least the first half of the year.  

They had the 4th best run differential in all of MLB last year (expected to win 96), and without those guys you mentioned (for the vast majority of the year).  We were 36 runs behind them tied with Houston for 5th/6th in run differential...we won 101 and HOU won 90.  

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

So we're going to have the sixth-worst rotation in baseball next year?

Welp. Looks like another year to bet on the OVER for the Orioles and not make any other sports bets all season.

And 5th worst bullpen.  Of course, they have us #2 at 3B.  Gunnar's now our 3B for the most part if FG is to be believed.  News to me.  :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

They had the 4th best run differential in all of MLB last year (expected to win 96), and without those guys you mentioned (for the vast majority of the year).  We were 36 runs behind them tied with Houston for 5th/6th in run differential...we won 101 and HOU won 90.  

Houston's the one that jumped out at me.  These projections are usually 'normalized' somehow, so the low W totals don't really bother me.  It's more about the context of the other teams, IMO.

I don't buy the Astros (or NYY) being better than us.  And even if they are, it's not by that much.  

 

I looked into Codify (the ranker) and saw he does individual pitcher consulting.  Pitchers pay him to get tailored scouting reports for future hitters to be faced.  He seemed to work with a few CHW pitchers.  Which made me wonder if there is/was some divided/untrusting type of clubhouse dynamics going on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...