Jump to content

Just a Thought


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

Thought it would be interesting to assume all prospects start at Norfolk and instead of putting them at their regular positions, to put them where they might have the best chance of playing in the majors or at least at positions where they might play and need more reps.

1B Kjerstad

2B Holliday

SS Ortiz 

3B 

C Handley

LF Norby

CF Cowser

RF Mayo

 

Some, I’m sure will argue that Cowser should be in LF, Holliday at SS, and Kjerstad in RF.    I’m ready to discuss why I have them where I have them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

A case can be made for Holliday and/or Ortiz getting more reps at 3B.  Assuming the brass wants to keep Gunnar at SS…

Yes.   Possible for sure if both Ortiz and Holliday are on the same infield.  Otherwise, I expect Westburg to move to 3B with Holliday at 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayo staying at 3B seems to be viewed as unlikely by many of the posters on this board. Most folks seem to think he's better suited for RF or 1B. What is the basis for this sentiment? Here is @Tony-OH's assessment of him from the 2023 prospects list:

"Defensively, Mayo also made strides at third base where he worked on moving closer to the hitter and working on a drop step vs positioning himself so deep. This allowed him to come in on balls more effectively and the drop step allowed him to set his feet under him better and use his plus plus arm to throw out runners. Mayo's throwing accuracy also improved this season with the better footwork and a slightly lowered arm angle though he can still struggle at time when moving to his left. Listed at 6-5, 230 the concern remains whether he will eventually end up too big to play an effective 3B, but for now, he's shown enough improvements that he can play 3B effectively if a team is going to live with a few more errors then some would like. In his limited play at first base, Mayo took well to the position and looks to be a legitimate option there, though he would waste his plus plus arm."

So he's 22 years old. He's clearly made significant improvements on his defense at 3B. Who's to say he can't continue to improve. Cal was 6' 4" and 225 lbs and played both SS and 3B. I don't remember anyone describing his arm as "plus-plus." I just think you have to give Coby an opportunity to stay at 3B. If he can play a solid 3B his bat is elite. I think he's a bit less valuable at 1B or RF.  Just my $0.02.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. I think it's kind of silly not to pencil Mayo in, for AAA of all places, at his primary position.

I think the O's goal should be to have him be the primary 3B too, starting on opening day. Just my 2 cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

Mayo staying at 3B seems to be viewed as unlikely by many of the posters on this board. Most folks seem to think he's better suited for RF or 1B. What is the basis for this sentiment?

34 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Agree. I think it's kind of silly not to pencil Mayo in, for AAA of all places, at his primary position.

I think the O's goal should be to have him be the primary 3B too, starting on opening day. Just my 2 cents.

How I read the OP is to simply play with the roster/prospect flexibility.  It's just a 'for fun' winter thread more than predicting the end goal or what anyone would do.  (Though that speculation has happened elsewhere.)

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

Mayo staying at 3B seems to be viewed as unlikely by many of the posters on this board. Most folks seem to think he's better suited for RF or 1B. What is the basis for this sentiment?

First of all, his fielding percentage remains quite substandard, as detailed in other posts.  

But the issue here isn’t whether Mayo may develop into a decent 3B.   It’s that we have several 3B who are far better than decent.   Having Mayo at 3B is not our best defensive alignment given the other players we have who play 3B.
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

First of all, his fielding percentage remains quite substandard, as detailed in other posts.  

But the issue here isn’t whether Mayo may develop into a decent 3B.   It’s that we have several 3B who are far better than decent.   Having Mayo at 3B is not our best defensive alignment given the other players we have who play 3B.
 

Kind of an age old question here. If you are swapping out players to improve your defense, do you then lose a bit on offence. If Mayo turns into a league average defender at 3B (I'm surprised you used fielding percentage in your post-by the way) but puts up an OPS+ of 150, can you live with that defense? As opposed to another player at 3B whose offence is league average but their defense is stellar? Third base is a tough one for that. Most folks lean toward CF, SS and C as defense first positions. 2B and 3B are sort of in between. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

Kind of an age old question here. If you are swapping out players to improve your defense, do you then lose a bit on offence. If Mayo turns into a league average defender at 3B (I'm surprised you used fielding percentage in your post-by the way) but puts up an OPS+ of 150, can you live with that defense? As opposed to another player at 3B whose offence is league average but their defense is stellar? Third base is a tough one for that. Most folks lean toward CF, SS and C as defense first positions. 2B and 3B are sort of in between. 

I used fielding percentage for two reasons: (1) we don’t really have advanced metrics for minor leaguers, and (2) if the fielding percentage is quite bad, it’s hard to make up for that with range.  And, I’ve never heard anyone say Mayo has above average range anyway.  So, I’m pretty confident that if we had advanced metrics for MiL defense, Mayo wouldn’t score that well.  That’s not to say he can’t continue to improve, but I’m dubious he’ll be as good as our several other options defensively.  

As to your point about the tradeoff between offense and defense, I generally agree.  We aren’t trying to put our best defensive alignment on the field, we are trying to put the alignment that gives us the best offense/defense combination on the field.  It’s quite a complex equation with all our young players and the versatility that many of them have.  But because I believe we have several better defensive options at 3B, i believe it’s likely that our best alignment will have Mayo somewhere else.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
    • I would be very surprised if every last one of the GM's Elias talks to about quality starting pitching doesn't start by asking about Westburg and the rest.  Again, I think it's a mistake to believe that the O's have a ton of leverage here.  They certainly have some, and Elias is smart and disciplined, but I don't see any bargains.  I especially don't see the luxury of acting like youth and multiple years of control is any kind of rigid starting point for the O's.
    • I say this as someone who defended Cowser like 2 posts ago, but like his fWAR number is entirely dependent on how much you're buying his defense.  I can totally buy the argument that maybe OAA is overrating him a bit, so he's not really on pace to be a 5.5 win player.  The OAA number is pretty eye-popping.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...