Jump to content

Austin Hays: 2023 year in review and 2024 forecast


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Well you got me to click on the link and read the entire review so you have one viewer. I dont know if i'll read every one, but appreciate the effort nonetheless. Like you wrote I expect more of the same from Hays. Anything over a .325 OBP would be a career season from him it looks like, whether he's capable of doing it or not is the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love this idea and looking forward to more.

In typical Hays fashion he started off hot and faded a bit. But crucially he didn't crater, he just settled into that mid-.700s range and stayed healthy while playing good D. That's plenty good enough for me, though I wonder if we could see him platooned a bit more if Cowser can show he's an option in LF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how often he'll bat leadoff?  Yet another thing dependent on Holliday's ETA...

The chase% in 2022 spiked up from 2021.  And reverted in 2023.  Which makes me wonder if the Wall change played games with his mind in the box?  

Does he get 550 PAs?  Or do LHH rookies cut into his playing time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, I really appreciate you taking the time to put it together.  Content like this is one of the reasons I stop by the OH so frequently.  Huge thanks for that.  I like the writeup, the format, etc.  Well done.

Second, as to Hays, I agree that we know what we've got at this stage.  He's a decent/good, but not great player, and is capable of carrying a team for a couple weeks when he get hot.  But also completely capable of looking like Mateo at the plate for an extended time too.  I like him, I like how he plays the game, and seems like a great guy.  But he's also someone I'm comfortable with moving if the opportunity arises, and to give some of his playing time to Cowser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As always another factor with him is health and stamina, and I think that both has to do with his fading once summer hits. At times I feel he’s played through things he shouldn’t have just to stay on the field, and I hope he doesn’t force it this year again. 
 

He’s also maybe the biggest victim of the wall, having to cover a lot more ground (not sure how much bWARcorrected after the fact,  but it really didn’t like his defense in 2022) and losing 4 or 5 homers per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appreciate the write up and think it’s a good idea. I don’t expect any more from Hays than what we’ve seen each of the last 3 years. As you said, we know who he is. I do think we could expect more from Cowser if he took over every day in LF. It would be wise to look to trade either Hays or Santander, since their time here is limited. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I hope not ever.  The OBP isn't there.

Yeah, I made that comment with the same mindset.  I saw he had 25 GS and 116 PAs out of the leadoff spot in 2023 and was going to make the obvious comment about the R/RBI distribution shifting a bit more than anything else.  He had 107 PAs from cleanup, 134 from #5, and 116 from #6.  He strikes me as a guy who will eventually hit 6-8 if the bulk of the young guys pan out.

FWIW, he slashed .314/.371/.486 hitting leadoff.  Maybe he should hit there more often!  ;)  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Count me in @Frobbyand thanks for the effort. 
 

Hays has something new this year too. He has footsteps lurking behind him. It’s almost impossible to predict if that helps him or makes him play tight. 
 

Hays is a good player and like Mateo last year, he is likely penciled in to start on opening day. But his time will be earned by what he is doing in 2024, and there are guys itching to eat in to that time. 
 

It is a good problem, and I wish him the best. Hopefully 2024 is his best year ever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Frobby.  I did not know what wOBA or xwOBA were, but began to look them up and thought this would be helpful to share for those like me that may not know what these two stats are:

Quote

Weighted On-Base Average (wOBA)

wOBA assigns proper value to every possible offensive event that happens while a batter is at the plate. Those proper valuations of singles, doubles, homers, walks, etc., distinguish wOBA from more traditional measures like AVG, OBP, and SLG. Also, for simplicity wOBA is scaled to look like OBP, which means that, say, .400 is elite and .290 is pretty poor. Babe Ruth is the all-time leader with a patently absurd wOBA of .513. You can read more about wOBA at FanGraphs

Weighted On-Base Average, Expected (xwOBA)

xwOBA grows out of wOBA (see immediately above) and is an estimation of what a hitter's wOBA should be based on things like exit velocity off the bat and launch angle. xwOBA attempts to strip away luck -- bad or good -- and defensive play from wOBA and identify a hitter's baseline skill. It's somewhat useful for getting an idea of how a hitter figures to perform in the near-term future. Basically, if a hitter's xwOBA is significantly lower than his wOBA, he's probably going to come back to earth at some point. There's some evidence that slower players tend to underperform relative to their xwOBA and faster players tend to overperform, but even so xwOBA has utility. On the other side of things, if a hitter's xwOBA is quite a bit higher than his wOBA, then better days are likely ahead. Here's more on xwOBA

Please note that the following chart is meant as an estimate, and that league-average wOBA varies on a year-by-year basis. It is set to the same scale as OBP, so league-average wOBA in a given year should be very close to the league-average OBP. To see the league-average wOBA for every year from 1901 to the present, check the FanGraphs leaderboards.

wOBA Rules of Thumb
Rating wOBA
Excellent .400
Great .370
Above Average .340
Average .320
Below Average .310
Poor .300
Awful .290
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

Thank you, Frobby.  I did not know what wOBA or xwOBA were, but began to look them up and thought this would be helpful to share for those like me that may not know what these two stats are:

Please note that the following chart is meant as an estimate, and that league-average wOBA varies on a year-by-year basis. It is set to the same scale as OBP, so league-average wOBA in a given year should be very close to the league-average OBP. To see the league-average wOBA for every year from 1901 to the present, check the FanGraphs leaderboards.

wOBA Rules of Thumb
Rating wOBA
Excellent .400
Great .370
Above Average .340
Average .320
Below Average .310
Poor .300
Awful .290

Thanks, Greg.  And the reason I listed those was to illustrate that there might be certain segments where wOBA and xwOBA don’t line up, indicating some good or bad luck during that period.   In Hays’ case, for example, the period where his OPS dropped from .852 to .759 coincided with a stretch where the gap between wOBA and xwOBA shrunk from 27 points to 8.   So that suggests that Hays had been a bit lucky prior to that period, and was then quite unlucky in the period in question.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...