Jump to content

Prospect Trade Value


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

You have to stay in the “sweet spot” 

https://www.scienceforsport.com/acutechronic-workload-ratio/
 

I’d be a little nervous trading with Marlins, seems their pitchers do down with injuries fairly regularly.  Whatever they are doing isn’t working. 

Same could be said of Orioles pitchers too. Means, Bautista, Bradish (whatever his outcome is…I’m not holding my breath) plus we had several minor leaguers that have gone under the knife this spring.

I think the science is far from being settled.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, scarey1999 said:

Same could be said of Orioles pitchers too. Means, Bautista, Bradish (whatever his outcome is…I’m not holding my breath) plus we had several minor leaguers that have gone under the knife this spring.

I think the science is far from being settled.  

Exactly.

Might not ever be an exact science, might be too much variance in the human body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, scarey1999 said:

Same could be said of Orioles pitchers too. Means, Bautista, Bradish (whatever his outcome is…I’m not holding my breath) plus we had several minor leaguers that have gone under the knife this spring.

I think the science is far from being settled.  

I agree the science isn’t exact. 
 

With that said, the O’s have done pretty well in the pitching health category.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Exactly.

Might not ever be an exact science, might be too much variance in the human body.

For sure.  Bautista is putting a lot more valgus stress on the bow than, say, Cole Irvin.  
 

But I think it’s pretty well documented that both over work & under work will lead to issues. 
 

Could Bautista have avoided problems if he wasn’t risen so hard last year? 

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jamalshw said:

Sure, I get that point, but I am not convinced there is no roster spot here for Povich or McDermott. Sure, it's hard to see the path for Norby given Henderson, Holliday, Mayo, and Westburg on the infield. And it's hard to find the spot for Stowers with Mullins, Santander and Hays right now and Cowser and Kjerstad both ahead of him. 

I also don't know that I agree with the idea of trading away 4 guys just because there is no spot for 1 when you can get away with dealing less value (even if we don't have the spot). Value is value and if you don't have a spot for it, we can always trade that in a different deal for additional pieces, either lower level minor leaguers or relief pitching.

Guys like Norby and Stowers, unfortunately, for them are nothing more than collateral for the team at the moment. Just because I have the money to burn to buy something I want, doesn't mean I should burn it if I can get it (or something comparable) for less. 

All that said, it'll be interesting to see what moves we make midseason. We certainly have the pieces for it and it is getting to the point now that holding on to them is starting to hurt their value given their ages (particularly in the case of Stowers).

Don’t make the mistake of over valuing non elite prospects based on 5 games at Norfolk and ST.   Stowers had minimal value.  Norby, McDermott, and Povich had some value but not a lot individually.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I agree the science isn’t exact. 
 

With that said, the O’s have done pretty well in the pitching health category.  

Maybe?

It's so hard to tell.

Wasn't there a stretch of time when the Rays just totally dodged arm injuries for like 2-3 seasons?

Folks started to think they'd found the secret, then Boom!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Maybe?

It's so hard to tell.

Wasn't there a stretch of time when the Rays just totally dodged arm injuries for like 2-3 seasons?

Folks started to think they'd found the secret, then Boom!

Good point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a fine line to walk here.  The O's have a stockpile of talent that is ready for promotion, but nowhere to put them.  However,  if they bundle a bunch of these guys and ship them off in a trade,  does that leave you caught with your pants down if one or two of the big leaguers goes down with injury?  Who fills that gap on the roster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Norby, Stowers, McDermott, Povich for Luzardo is a no brainer from the Orioles side.  Slim chance either Povich or McDermott become Luzardo and Norby and Stowers are not even within our top 5 guys.

Not sure who the Marlins would want.

Agree but who Knows? You would have to think the Marlins are looking to punt, and the Orioles are Def looking for a top shelf starter, so heres hoping something gets done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't see why they would want to wait until the deadline.  More time with a team should equal more return.

There is very little history of early season trades like you are proposing, though there is sense to your proposal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, emmett16 said:

For sure.  Bautista is putting a lot more valgus stress on the bow than, say, Cole Irvin.  
 

But I think it’s pretty well documented that both over work & under work will lead to issues. 
 

Could Bautista have avoided problems if he wasn’t risen so hard last year? 

My recollection was that he hurt his arm on a pitch when his landing foot slipped.  Seemed like more of a freak injury than wear and tear.  But who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baltfan said:

There is very little history of early season trades like you are proposing, though there is sense to your proposal. 

I was wondering the same thing, re early season blockbuster trades. But if you can do it a week before spring training starts or even during spring training, why not a week after spring training? Surely the Marlins have more of an idea right now as to how their 2024 will go than they did two months ago. A sell off now would probably benefit them more in he long run than a sell off in July. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...