Jump to content

Brandon Hyde 2024


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

Pulling him for Rortvedt as if Rortvedt is Juan Soto - while Suarez was pitching his career best game and cruising - was incredibly stupid. 

Hyde gets away with terrible managing because he has so much talent that bails him out. Anyone that points to the team's record and can't see how bad he is and refuses to accept this team would have an even better record with an average manager has low baseball IQ. 


Thank You. Well said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

Yeah really, really poor to pull Suarez there.  If he'd been on the ropes or even a dangerous lefty was coming up I'd sort of get it.  But Suarez was rolling.

Yeah, I hated that decision.  He deserved the chance to finish the inning.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

Pulling him for Rortvedt as if Rortvedt is Juan Soto - while Suarez was pitching his career best game and cruising - was incredibly stupid. 

Hyde gets away with terrible managing because he has so much talent that bails him out. Anyone that points to the team's record and can't see how bad he is and refuses to accept this team would have an even better record with an average manager has low baseball IQ. 

As much want to lay blame here on Hyde, he does manage according to Os analytics books…meaning LH/RH matchups both hitting and pitching, pulling starters at certain pitch counts regardless of game situation, etc.  like if Hyde deviated from these in house probabilities he would not be current manager.  So I get fans frustrations when moves don’t work, but Os (Elias/Sig) philosophy believes they do at higher winning probabilities, so that’s where frustrations should be directed as well. 

Edited by Say O!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

Pulling him for Rortvedt as if Rortvedt is Juan Soto - while Suarez was pitching his career best game and cruising - was incredibly stupid. 

Hyde gets away with terrible managing because he has so much talent that bails him out. Anyone that points to the team's record and can't see how bad he is and refuses to accept this team would have an even better record with an average manager has low baseball IQ. 

This. 

 

10 minutes ago, waroriole said:

That’s the thing. He didn’t have to use the crappy bullpen at all in that situation. 

Exactly.  Yeah the bullpen has been bad.  So let your starter who is cruising go on and face that #8 batter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised to see Al start the 7th. Hyde got about as much as he could out of him and pushed him to a season high pitch count. I have no problem pulling him with a LHB coming up and asking the bullpen to get ONE out. Hyde out Perez in a position where you would expect him to succeed. Perez just didn't do the job and that is on him. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

Pulling him for Rortvedt as if Rortvedt is Juan Soto - while Suarez was pitching his career best game and cruising - was incredibly stupid. 

Hyde gets away with terrible managing because he has so much talent that bails him out. Anyone that points to the team's record and can't see how bad he is and refuses to accept this team would have an even better record with an average manager has low baseball IQ. 

Well I am proud then to stand up for my low baseball IQ.  He managed this team to the best record in baseball coming into today with 4 starters missing significant time.  He has also managed this team to this record with his closer in a collapse the second half of the season.  If you think any other manager would have a better record losing Bradish, Means, Wells, Columbe, GRod and allstar Jordan Westberg then you need a new gauge for your baseball IQ.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I was surprised to see Al start the 7th. Hyde got about as much as he could out of him and pushed him to a season high pitch count. I have no problem pulling him with a LHB coming up and asking the bullpen to get ONE out. Hyde out Perez in a position where you would expect him to succeed. Perez just didn't do the job and that is on him. 

This. Perez might be the #3 option out of the pen now with Webb out, and #1 and #2 were unavailable today. He inherited a 2 out, none on situation and he needs to be able to turn that into a zero, even if that wily Kevin Cash can pinch hit a righty with a 90 OPS+ and a switch hitter with a 63 OPS+.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, I hated that decision.  He deserved the chance to finish the inning.

I think it was clearly a pitch count decision, which it seems like a lot of teams are slaves to these day.

Suarez was two pitches away from his season high of 97.   So facing one more batter would be pretty much committing to a new season high.   And he was on "normal" four days rest -- every other time he has been over 90, was on e 5+ days of rest.   He hadn't thrown more than 89 on normal rest all season.

So I thinkt he decision was based on pitch count.  A lot of people thought he was done after 6.   I'm sure THAT waswhen the decision was actually made.   Hyde could have taken him out after 6, and would have been overjoyed to get 18 shutout outs from Suarez.   But he probably decided at that point to let him start the 7th and get up to about 95 pitches.   So maybe he'd only have to get 7 or 8 outs from the bullpen instead of 9 outs.

And to get the 7, or 8, or 9 outs out of the pen, he basically only had available Perez, Kimbrel, Baker, Akin, and Smith.   I think he was probably pencilling in Smith for the 9th (which says somehting about our pen when you consider that we were going to try to close a 1 run road division game with a guy the Marlins released 8 weeks ago!).   So Perez was an obvious choice to get some of those outs, given the alternatives.   Tampa's lineup had 6 righties, a switch hitter, and 2 lefties.   So there weren't a lot of places to use Perez to maximize his matchup potential.  But given the alternatives, it was pretty much a given that Perez was going to pitch.

So bringing him in to face a lefty (or force a bench move) when your starter was basically at his season high pitch count, seems pretty reasonable given what Hyde was working with.

The sad thing is what he ahs to work with in the bullpen right now.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, accinfo said:

Well I am proud then to stand up for my low baseball IQ.  He managed this team to the best record in baseball coming into today with 4 starters missing significant time.  He has also managed this team to this record with his closer in a collapse the second half of the season.  If you think any other manager would have a better record losing Bradish, Means, Wells, Columbe, GRod and allstar Jordan Westberg then you need a new gauge for your baseball IQ.  

Well said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Moshagge3 said:

This. Perez might be the #3 option out of the pen now with Webb out, and #1 and #2 were unavailable today. He inherited a 2 out, none on situation and he needs to be able to turn that into a zero, even if that wily Kevin Cash can pinch hit a righty with a 90 OPS+ and a switch hitter with a 63 OPS+.

Yes, Perez failed not Hyde, used 2 PH ( O'Hearn and Adley) with runners in Scoring position, the absolute moves to make both times, but no execution. Not to mention Coby fell on his ass with 2 in scoring position. It's hard to win when you only score one run. At some point the players have to do better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game was more on the offense and the Rays pitching was just better than them today.  It happens ad you can’t expect to score 4+ runs every game like they do lots of nights.  Even the best offenses get shut down at times so it is what it is.  Day off after tough road trip in Toronto and late flight into Tampa Friday so taking 2 out of 3 is great job.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...