Jump to content

Brothers in Christ


Explosivo

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Babkins said:

I did watch Ted Lasso, and I enjoyed it a lot, but if there was any reference to The Natural, I have long forgotten it. I've held my opinion of the film ever since I first read the book, which was probably in 2006 or 2007. I loved the film as a child, but once I read the book, I just felt that I'd been lied to.

 

The "review" language you used in your post reminded me of this scene!  Fun stuff. The book felt like the lie to me! :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, baltfan said:

I know it can’t work every time, but did you pray for Holliday last night?  

The answer to your question is found earlier in this thread...

16 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

And for the record, I did not pray for Jackson today either. My mind has been on other personal issues.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Babkins said:

Counterpoint: The book is a complicated, layered, richly allegorical work of literature, whereas the film is a beautifully shot, revisionist, dumbed-down piece of Hollywood schlock. I'll die on this hill.

I read the book years before I saw the movie.  I thought both were great.  Obviously the ending was 180 degrees different, but that’s okay with me.  It was beautifully executed.   If I’m flipping channels and come across The Natural, I will watch that movie to the end and get goosebumps even though I know what’s coming.   

I do think it’s better to read the book before seeing the movie, rather than vice versa.  But that’s usually the case.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

The answer to your question is found earlier in this thread...

 

So what happens if you pray for one outcome that is positive for the O’s and another fan prays for an outcome that is positive for the opposition?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

So what happens if you pray for one outcome that is positive for the O’s and another fan prays for an outcome that is positive for the opposition?

I'm somewhat skeptical that God is up there counting prayers and making the team with the most win. Otherwise the Yanks, who almost certainly have the most fans and by extension the most (insert your favorite religion here) fans, would never lose.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Fiver6565 said:

It’s absolutely coincidental. It’s not Jesus, it’s superior talent. Have you tried praying for Ramon Urias or Jorge Mateo?  They need Jesus’ help more than Gunnar or Grayson I’d say. 

You can believe what you want, and that's the beauty of having free will and living in a free country. As for my experience, I have literally hundreds more examples. Off the top of my head to name a few, Damar Hamlin is alive and healthy playing football again, Kevin Everett is walking around after taking a injury that could have parallelized him, my own father was out of shock trauma in 14 days and he is still alive even after having his skull crushed in by a tow truck hook that whipped lashed off a lamp post to crush him in the back of his head.  He was home and out of the rehab hospital in 1 month and recovered after the entire Church prayed for him. And then in sports there's Joe Gibbs and the Monday Night Miracle and the 1992 Braves comeback win against the Pirates. There's examples of my days playing Fantasy Football when I was up against my buddy and needed 4 TDs to win, and Jamal Lewis scores 4 TDs just in time on Monday Night Football.

I do believe in the Scientific Method, which is defined as:

scientific method
 

noun

  1. The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generally involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena, experimentation to demonstrate the truth or falseness of the hypothesis, and a conclusion that validates or modifies the hypothesis.
  2. A method of discovering knowledge about the natural world based in making falsifiable predictions (hypotheses), testing them empirically, & developing theories that match known data from repeatable physical experimentation.
  3. A method of investigation involving observation and theory to test scientific hypotheses

 

At some point when I have hundreds of life experiences and examples, it would be foolish to ignore large samples of data.

With that being said, GOD is not a metaphorical Genie in the sky and it doesn't work that way. Sin and disbelief separates man from GOD, so that must be addressed first. I know that I'm no Saint either. I mean, my account here is evidence of that. But one condition I had when I saw some of these answered prayers was that I wouldn't be a coward or deny it/just keep quiet if they happened, so here we are.  I don't go out of my way to talk about these things, but if they happened to come up, like this situation where Jackson Holiday responded when the reporter asked about it, then I'll reply and I won't deny.

Often times, while some of these experiences might have used sports, the truth is that they were not about sports. That remark requires a much more widened/broadened view of life to consider what I really mean by that. But this is the internet so I'll leave it at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

I'm somewhat skeptical that God is up there counting prayers and making the team with the most win. Otherwise the Yanks, who almost certainly have the most fans and by extension the most (insert your favorite religion here) fans, would never lose.

They probably also have the most praying for them to lose, too

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Babkins said:

Counterpoint: The book is a complicated, layered, richly allegorical work of literature, whereas the film is a beautifully shot, revisionist, dumbed-down piece of Hollywood schlock. I'll die on this hill.

I don't know if Malamud was brilliant, I thought the main point of the book was no matter what you do it'll all work out poorly in the end.

But I did enjoy both the book and the movie in completely different ways. And someone needs to remake the movie staying true to the book and just being relentlessly dark and depressing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

So what happens if you pray for one outcome that is positive for the O’s and another fan prays for an outcome that is positive for the opposition?

All I know is GOD is not a genie, and like I said in my other post, I theorize that what results often isn't really about sports, but about what has or is going to happen in the life of the individuals. Often times it's a test of faith.

Overall though, this is a very good question. Any sensible person is right to ask it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I read the book years before I saw the movie.  I thought both were great.  Obviously the ending was 180 degrees different, but that’s okay with me.  It was beautifully executed.   If I’m flipping channels and come across The Natural, I will watch that movie to the end and get goosebumps even though I know what’s coming.   

I do think it’s better to read the book before seeing the movie, rather than vice versa.  But that’s usually the case.  
 

The Natural is a masterpiece.  The Producers got the rights and decided to make their own story.  And they did a wonderful job.  But you are right it is totally different.  The movie is a perfect display of the Heroes journey.   The movie wanted to show the importance of being honest doing the right thing.  The book is a subversive tale.....but well done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Gurgi said:

The Natural is a masterpiece.  The Producers got the rights and decided to make their own story.  And they did a wonderful job.  But you are right it is totally different.  The movie is a perfect display of the Heroes journey.   The movie wanted to show the importance of being honest doing the right thing.  The book is a subversive tale.....but well done. 

Well dang. I may have to reread the book after all of these posts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

You can believe what you want, and that's the beauty of having free will and living in a free country. As for my experience, I have literally hundreds more examples. Off the top of my head to name a few, Damar Hamlin is alive and healthy playing football again, Kevin Everett is walking around after taking a injury that could have parallelized him, my own father was out of shock trauma in 14 days and he is still alive even after having his skull crushed in by a tow truck hook that whipped lashed off a lamp post to crush him in the back of his head.  He was home and out of the rehab hospital in 1 month and recovered after the entire Church prayed for him. And then in sports there's Joe Gibbs and the Monday Night Miracle and the 1992 Braves comeback win against the Pirates. There's examples of my days playing Fantasy Football when I was up against my buddy and needed 4 TDs to win, and Jamal Lewis scores 4 TDs just in time on Monday Night Football.

I do believe in the Scientific Method, which is defined as:

scientific method
 

noun

  1. The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generally involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena, experimentation to demonstrate the truth or falseness of the hypothesis, and a conclusion that validates or modifies the hypothesis.
  2. A method of discovering knowledge about the natural world based in making falsifiable predictions (hypotheses), testing them empirically, & developing theories that match known data from repeatable physical experimentation.
  3. A method of investigation involving observation and theory to test scientific hypotheses

 

At some point when I have hundreds of life experiences and examples, it would be foolish to ignore large samples of data.

With that being said, GOD is not a metaphorical Genie in the sky and it doesn't work that way. Sin and disbelief separates man from GOD, so that must be addressed first. I know that I'm no Saint either. I mean, my account here is evidence of that. But one condition I had when I saw some of these answered prayers was that I wouldn't be a coward or deny it/just keep quiet if they happened, so here we are.  I don't go out of my way to talk about these things, but if they happened to come up, like this situation where Jackson Holiday responded when the reporter asked about it, then I'll reply and I won't deny.

Often times, while some of these experiences might have used sports, the truth is that they were not about sports. That remark requires a much more widened/broadened view of life to consider what I really mean by that. But this is the internet so I'll leave it at that.

Dude, this is the thing about anonymity on an internet message board, you really don’t know who you are talking to. I am far more versed in theology than I could ever explain in a post. But trust me on this, I have the real life credentials to discuss it in great depth.

While I have a great appreciation for those who are faith-based in their worldview/belief system. I don’t know of any sacred text of any of the major world religions that teaches that God is interested and/or invested in entertainment/sports. God has more cosmic things to be concerned about.

I’m certain that God loves you, I, every poster on this message board, Gunnar, Grayson, Mullins, Hays, Ohtani, Aaron Judge, and every other human being equally.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a man of Faith I can find no fault in anyone's beliefs. The Lord works in His own ways and in His own time. I do remember years ago Ted Koppel said living your life according to the Ten Commandments was a good thing. I still think that is a good way to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...