Jump to content

Tyler Wells goes on IL with right elbow inflammation. Update: Albert Suarez will start today's 1pm start.


DirtyBird

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

No, the corresponding move to Wells going on the IL was Banuelos today.

Heasley has to stay down until sometime next week, unless someone else goes on the iL.

Thanks I didn't hear about that move so yeah Heasley isn't coming up unless another Oriole goes on the IL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If/when Bradish and/or Means comes back, I've gotta think Wells goes to the pen.  Just based off this being -as previously mentioned- the third year in a row he can't stay healthy and not miss a start.  And we're still inside the first month of the season, he's already having elbow inflammation.

IMO, the most basic thing about being a starter is being able to take the ball every 5th day.  I think Irvin can do that, unfortunately Wells can't seem to be that dude.  That might be a too simplistic way of looking at the problem, but as much as I like Wells he just doesn't have the durability to be a starter.  

I hope that his stuff will be able to play up in the pen, that he can add a tick or two to the fastball.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Cody Sedlock.

I honestly forgot Zimmermann was still in the organization.  

If that's the guy for a one start...well, I suppose so.  But I'd hope to see Povich up after for the next time through the rotation.

Sedlock is retuning for 18 months away from the game. He did not make a start last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just looked at the rosters and there's no listing of Sedlock. Neither of the Suarez's is on the 40 man roster either.  Cade Povich and Chayce McDermott have pitched too recently for their contract to be selected and called up, so you can eliminate them from the options.

The options are Zimmerman, Suarez, and John Means. Suarez is not on the 40 man and John Means is still ramping up for his return off the IL.

All those factors point to Bruce Zimmerman. It would have been his turn to pitch in Norfolk anyway. (Last game he pitched, he piggy backed off of Means.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I just looked at the rosters and there's no listing of Sedlock. Neither of the Suarez's is on the 40 man roster either.  Cade Povich and Chayce McDermott have pitched too recently for their contract to be selected and called up, so you can eliminate them from the options.

The options are Zimmerman, Suarez, and John Means. Suarez is not on the 40 man and John Means is still ramping up for his return off the IL.

All those factors point to Bruce Zimmerman. It would have been his turn to pitch in Norfolk anyway. (Last game he pitched, he piggy backed off of Means.)

I would happily sacrifice Bryan Baker from the 40 man roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Not disagreeing with your take, but Mateo has better speed, defense and mlb experience. His adaptation to 2b defense tells me he’s the better defender in 2024+   Will Holiday’s bat play in 2024? It is an open question. 
    • I don't have a problem dealing Kjerstad in the right deal. I don't have a problem dealing Basallo in the right deal.  I do have a problem losing both of them. You know?
    • Where are the ABs for Mayo? Verse a lefty you have Hays/Santander/Mountcastle above him as a bat.  He's worse than them defensively.  There's abs for him at DH vs LHP. If you stop using it to rest Rutch. Are you ready to bring him up to do that and only that? Because there's not 200 abs in that role for the rest of the season. It's not about Mateo vs Holliday.  It's about Holliday didn't look ready to be playing in the MLs.  If 3 weeks in the MiLs can fix that, great.  I'm skeptical. As to what to trade, instead of just throwing out stupid descriptives, give me names.  Are you willing to trade Basallo?  Mayo? Kjerstad?  Because if not, then Stowers and Norby are about the best you have.
    • Kjerstad is the best prospect we have that you can argue should be available in the right deal. The question is his defense and that could be enough to trade himself. I would rather keep him but should be available in the right deal.
    • My bad.  He can make the roster I guess.  😁
    • For the record, I hated giving him up, and felt he could have had a long-term role in this organization, and said that many, many times. That said, this is the game, and this team is highly unlikely to ever really regret it unless something very strange happens with Holliday. I totally understand the trade from the O's perspective, but a lot of how we feel about this trade long-term is going to be determined by a few starts in October.
    • There are clearly at bats available for Mayo and let’s not get into this overrating Mateo stuff again.  You should have learned your lesson. He is doing well in a part time role and they are riding him playing well for the moment but Holliday is the clear better option and will be the obvious starter within 6 weeks.  And we all know this isn’t what Mateo really is. That has been proven. That said, he can have a role on this team and he is proving to be an asset, which is good to see. As for what to trade, I think that’s an awful take but it is what it is.  Some people are ok with hoping for the best and if that doesn’t work out, so be it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...