Jump to content

Off-season Qualifying Offer Question


OsFanInOhio

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

This is incredibly stupid. If a 30 year old is 1 WAR better than a 25 year old with multiple years of team control, it doesn’t justify having the 30 year old on a $20 million contract while the 25 year old rots.

Congrats, you have concocted a scenario where letting him walk makes sense. It's also possible that Kjerstad is not an MLB-level player. Maybe they QO Santander and he accepts, then they flip Kjerstad for a pitcher and groom Mayo to be the eventual RF starter. A lot is still possible in April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It isn't just the money, they've got multiple guys that have done well in the minors vying for that roster spot.  You going to keep them all in AAA for another season?

If he has a year like the last two, I’d probably make the QO because it’s doubtful he’d accept. If he accepts, you’ll figure it out.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question isn’t whether Santander is worth 20 million( he’s not.)

And there’s no doubt he would take a QO from the Orioles.

The question is whether we have not one, but several guys who can do as well, or almost as well, for league minimum.

I like Tony a lot, he’s one of the best rule five guys of the last 10 years.

But I hope he’s for sale and I hope somebody trades for him quickly.

Edited by Philip
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

The question isn’t whether Santander is worth 20 million, there is absolutely no doubt he would take a Q0 from the Orioles.

The question is whether we have not Juan, but several guys who can do as well, or almost as well for league minimum.

I like Tony a lot, he’s one of the best rule five guys of the last 10 years.

But I hope he’s for sale and I hope somebody trades for him quickly.

What makes you so confident he would accept? If he is coming off 3 years of what he’s done the last 2? I’ve mentioned in other posts that he’s younger and a better defender than both soler and Hernandez, who are similar offensive profiles. If he performs as well as last year, or better, I’d be shocked if he doesn’t have a market value higher than 1 yr 20mm. Tho the QO would hurt his market value. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DirtyBird said:

Would that really affect whether or not he’s worth $20 million next season?

 

I’d like the pick so I’m hoping he goes off, we offer, and he rejects.  He was worth 24 MM last year and 18.5MM in 2022.  So, technically, he should be worth right about 20 MM next year(depending on performance). I’d also wager he’d be more productive than Norby, Stowers, & Kjerstad.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, OsFanInOhio said:

What makes you so confident he would accept? If he is coming off 3 years of what he’s done the last 2? I’ve mentioned in other posts that he’s younger and a better defender than both soler and Hernandez, who are similar offensive profiles. If he performs as well as last year, or better, I’d be shocked if he doesn’t have a market value higher than 1 yr 20mm. Tho the QO would hurt his market value. 

If the QO hurts his market, that could increase the.likelihood of him accepting.  Then he can't be QO'd the next year.  

As Emmett said, he's pretty close currently.  So 2024 will influence the teams and his decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanInOhio said:

What makes you so confident he would accept? If he is coming off 3 years of what he’s done the last 2? I’ve mentioned in other posts that he’s younger and a better defender than both soler and Hernandez, who are similar offensive profiles. If he performs as well as last year, or better, I’d be shocked if he doesn’t have a market value higher than 1 yr 20mm. Tho the QO would hurt his market value. 

He will be 30 in October. Over the last several years, he has gotten slower, his range has diminished, his arm is neither strong nor accurate( if I read the savant page correctly) his career years were at least a couple years ago. Last year was good, but there’s a lot more blue on that 2023 page.
Also, Baltimore is the new Hot Place, and he could get a second WS Ring( because we get one this year!)here if he accepted a QO, and he loves it here. Of course he’d accept.

But the main thing is that we have younger and cheaper guys at the beginning of their age curve, and we can use that 20 mill to lock up Gunnar and the gang.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, emmett16 said:

This thread is a going to be super funny shortly after Santander goes on a heater.  

Wait for it. It's going to happen.

Santander is a better overall player than all the aforementioned prospects in this thread. The goal is to be better that the other 29 MLB teams.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Wait for it. It's going to happen.

Santander is a better overall player than all the aforementioned prospects in this thread. The goal is to be better that the other 29 MLB teams.

And now we hopefully don’t have to worry about picking between spending on him and bringing in other free agents / extending other guys. So we should be trying to sign or extend anyone who makes us better (or taking the pick at least if he does leave). 
 

This thread hadn’t been meant to advocate for him leaving. Just curiosity if he does leave. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Wait for it. It's going to happen.

Santander is a better overall player than all the aforementioned prospects in this thread. The goal is to be better that the other 29 MLB teams.

Wait, since when is money no object?

It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Three Run Homer said:

I like O'Hearn more than Santander as a hitter going forward.  

But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield. 

If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.  

Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's not just that. But it's all of it (I would argue). It's the message that the org has made to the fans/potential paying customers through their actions, that we are not willing to do what it takes to be excellent. Yes we will give you a good team but we are not ever going to be committed to becoming great. That goes into the crappy ball park, the refusal to add meaningful payroll no matter what, the dogmatic adherence to "budget ball", etc. Who's the face of the Rays? They had Longoria for a long time, but everyone else they got rid of when the time came to trade them or keep them. (Except Franco and who knows what will happen there?) Every time that they have had a team in serious WS discission/contention, they never make meaningful adds to that team to try to win it all. What big FA have they ever signed? IMO all those things matter as the message you send to the potential customer/fan.
    • I didn't know this, I suspect a lot of people who aren't fans of the Padres didn't know this.
    • Stuff+ doesn't look at if a ball is a strike or not. What good is having incredible Stuff+ numbers if you have a WHIP of 1.500. I'm sure Fujinami has great Stuff+ numbers but we all know he can't pitch. I have no idea what PitchingBot is, but Kopech's FIP is 5.67. His xERA is 4.26 and the statcast models do not LOVE Kopech. His Pitching Run Value is negative for every pitch he throws. He's well below average in every area except for xBA, Fastball Velocity, Whiff%, K% and Extension. Every other model is below average to poor. He's prone to giving up HRs as well.
    • I don’t agree at all.  Everyone knows Boras’ reputation for playing hardball with teams and often taking players to free agency.  If you hire him, you do it because that’s the kind of agent you want.  The players’ aren’t innocents being led down the wrong path by Boras.  They’re going down the path they choose.   
    • Oh, please!   There you go again.
    • Sure.  I agree to an extent.   Elias obviously enjoys having depth, both for the ML team and for trading pieces.  It’s just my opinion that there are certain guys he’s unwilling to include.   He should be able to get upgrades even without those three on the table.   Hypothetically, if Elias offered Kjerstad + for Crochet and the WS insisted on Basallo or Mayo, I believe Elias would move to plan B.   He’s willing to give up something for short term gains but he’s going to draw the line somewhere.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...