Jump to content

Basallo for Miller y/n?


Recommended Posts

Just now, sevastras said:

Would you classify yourself as a realist, pessimist, or devils advocate?

Are you questioning my level of self awareness?

 

I do play the devil's advocate on occasion when I think it's the best way to convey a point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

That's fair. But the starter will have similar injury risk. Almost all pitchers get hurt in the modern game. That's just a reality. You have to use them while they are upright.

By the way, there aren't going to be that many high end MLB starting pitchers on the market, like last year. Maybe SEA is a team who would be willing? But then they are going to want someone who is ready to help their lineup currently. 

A guy who throws as hard as Miller will carry a higher injury risk than most.

Kjerstad is ready to help anyone's lineup, he just needs a chance. There will be opportunities out there this off-season if Elias wants to be aggressive about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year the 112 loss A's did not trade Trevor May.

The SIgbot's report of the asymmetry between Miller and a hand selected, long trained bat is probably "maximum".

It is a fair bet Elias taking in all the data will deal near the deadline when postures will relax and maybe a few more marginal teams change the supply-demand mix in the run up to the deadline.    Last year relievers that was Scott Barlow, Kenyan Middleton, Brad Hand, Dominic Leone, Sam Moll, Chris Stratton, Kendall Graveman, Joe Kelly, Trent Thornton and Pierce Johnson on the undercard in the final week.    Elias moved early on Shintaro Fujinami on 7/19.

https://www.mlb.com/news/every-2023-mlb-trade-deadline-deal

Reynaldo Lopez, David Robertson, Paul Sewald and Jordan Hicks were headliners, and perhaps a fair yardstick around where I think Elias will be shopping this summer in Felix's absence.

The MLB draft still in the early years of being later on the calendar isn't until 7/14, and the weeks preceding that use up a lot of bandwidth for front offices.

No for me on Basallo for Miller - I think for the clubhouse all else being equal Elias might prefer to keep the 2025 runway clear for Felix, apart from the usual short term pitcher commitment preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Are you questioning my level of self awareness?

 

I do play the devil's advocate on occasion when I think it's the best way to convey a point.

 

Just curious, because you tend to argue the opposing view when the opportunity presents itself. 
And yes, that would be a question of self awareness. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, deward said:

A guy who throws as hard as Miller will carry a higher injury risk than most.

Kjerstad is ready to help anyone's lineup, he just needs a chance. There will be opportunities out there this off-season if Elias wants to be aggressive about it.

SEA is a team in first place with a serious lack of offense. I can't see them being willing to part with one of their starters who already is and "is" for someone (who no doubt talented) is still a "may be". 

But I agree, there will be opportunities to improve the club during the trading window/deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sevastras said:

Just curious, because you tend to argue the opposing view when the opportunity presents itself. 
And yes, that would be a question of self awareness. 😁

Sometimes I do question what I think of as a poorly structured argument.

In this specific case I'd fall somewhere between Basallo and Kjerstad.

I don't think the one is enough and I wouldn't give up the other.

I do think the cost to acquire him in 2024 would be high.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, deward said:

A guy who throws as hard as Miller will carry a higher injury risk than most.

Kjerstad is ready to help anyone's lineup, he just needs a chance. There will be opportunities out there this off-season if Elias wants to be aggressive about it.

Is there a study showing that a guy that throws 100-102 is more of a risk than someone that throws 97-99 or 94-96?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sometimes I do question what I think of as a poorly structured argument.

In this specific case I'd fall somewhere between Basallo and Kjerstad.

I don't think the one is enough and I wouldn't give up the other.

I do think the cost to acquire him in 2024 would be high.

See, that wasn’t so hard. I would agree with your assessment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea of a Mason Miller/Felix Bautista tandem in the backend for a few years is tantalizing and a huge advantage in the postseason. Given our depth in MLB ready position players and our complete lack of pitching prospects outside of Povich and McDermott (who himself cannot seem to find the strike zone this year), I'm more willing to take the risk on dealing elite position player prospects for young, controllable pitching. 

The problem with Miller though is the heightened risk of an elbow issue which means he could be out 18 months+ if he needs TJS, but even if he doesn't he's currently limited in how much he is used. Given that, Basallo is a bit too steep a cost for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Last year the 112 loss A's did not trade Trevor May.

The SIgbot's report of the asymmetry between Miller and a hand selected, long trained bat is probably "maximum".

It is a fair bet Elias taking in all the data will deal near the deadline when postures will relax and maybe a few more marginal teams change the supply-demand mix in the run up to the deadline.    Last year relievers that was Scott Barlow, Kenyan Middleton, Brad Hand, Dominic Leone, Sam Moll, Chris Stratton, Kendall Graveman, Joe Kelly, Trent Thornton and Pierce Johnson on the undercard in the final week.    Elias moved early on Shintaro Fujinami on 7/19.

https://www.mlb.com/news/every-2023-mlb-trade-deadline-deal

Reynaldo Lopez, David Robertson, Paul Sewald and Jordan Hicks were headliners, and perhaps a fair yardstick around where I think Elias will be shopping this summer in Felix's absence.

The MLB draft still in the early years of being later on the calendar isn't until 7/14, and the weeks preceding that use up a lot of bandwidth for front offices.

No for me on Basallo for Miller - I think for the clubhouse all else being equal Elias might prefer to keep the 2025 runway clear for Felix, apart from the usual short term pitcher commitment preference.

Whatever was part of the decision making matrix to acquire Fujinama and Flaherty, I hope have been discarded/will not be used this go around. Those two deals were minuses for the club and contributed nothing to our efforts for postseason success.

Elias has already fixed the #1 starter issue. Now he has a high leverage/late inning reliever hole on the roster. I hope that 2025 is not a consideration for 2024. We are an excellent late game reliever/closer away from being the best team in baseball and the WS favorite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sometimes I do question what I think of as a poorly structured argument.

In this specific case I'd fall somewhere between Basallo and Kjerstad.

I don't think the one is enough and I wouldn't give up the other.

I do think the cost to acquire him in 2024 would be high.

Would Mayo serve as that "in between"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • What do you mean starting for Slater? He is not a starter. The Ragans matchup makes things interesting because he has reverse splits. I don't know the numbers but they need to start the guys with good numbers vs Ragans and/or LHP changeups, whether they are LH or RH.
    • Perhaps. I'm just saying he could stop the Chiefs, the Raiders disaster, and the Cowboys debacle certainly gave me pause.  Last night they certainly looked better, but the first 3 games gave me pause. I think we'll know more after a full season.
    • 1. If the Orioles had signed Jack Flaherty, Seth Lugo and Chris Sale to bolster our pitching staff last off-season, this place would have gone ballistic, and not in a good way. 2.  The Orioles ended the regular season last year flat as a pancake, and it carried into the offseason.  This year, while under the pressure of trying to keep up with the Yankees, the team struggled mightily to find consistent offense and any overall consistency.  Once that pressure waned with us knowing our destiny, guys seemed to loosen up, and we saw the offense come back.  I thought that might happen.  However, my question is, after laying an egg in the playoffs last year and recent struggles despite the last two series, does the pressure of the postseason put us back in the funk we saw throughout most of August and September? 3.  I've seen a consistent theme in this forum over the past week or two which is this:  "All we have to do is get hot at the right time, like Texas did last year."  While I agree that's true, and want us to be that team this year, isn't that statement kind of an admission that without getting hot, we're not good enough on our own merits to persevere in the tournament?  And before I get crucified for saying that, I'll point to what everyone has witnessed in recent months:  Bad/inconsistent bullpen, inconsistent offense, questions about our starting pitching, defensive lapses and being prone to not showing up offensively.  And please, let's not act like some, or all of these, don't exist.   That all being said, Go O's!!!!!  Let's get hot!!
    • All of the October ones will.    Tomorrow good chance to be the least important one if things go any kind of good. Granted ~40% chance it is the only one, but that is short series baseball, not him. I won't have warm feelings if he handles these guys but is bad twice the next series.
    • Would be upsetting to start Slater in any playoff game at this point. Even if you think Mullins/Cowser cant hit LHP (news flash Slater cant either)- keep the defense and the guys who "got you there"
    • If the point was "Skubal is better" you kind of proved that for them. More innings, more K's, less ER, less Walks, less hits, better W/L. Across the board. Ragans is very very very good- but Skubal is better, and the runaway for AL Cy Young. Either is capable of shutting down an offense- and Ragans did just that earlier this year. But we also roughed up Ragans in the other start. No matter who we face, we're going to find things that make it tough, its the playoffs. Lets keep playing good ball and get payback for 2014. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...