Jump to content

Some Absurd Trade Ideas from the Reds Forums


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

If you go back to 2019-2021 you will not find many posts by Roy.  Or the early part of 2022 for that matter.

He's far from the only one.

People have better things to do than watch a 47-win baseball team.  I was still watching parts of games but certainly not 9 innings every night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

People have better things to do than watch a 47-win baseball team.  I was still watching parts of games but certainly not 9 innings every night.

Yeah let's just call that the Dark Ages.

We saw a light at the end......way way at the end.  But it was a long walk to get to that light.

Edited by OnlyOneOriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OnlyOneOriole said:

Yeah let's just call that the Dark Ages.

We say a light at the end......way way at the end.  But it was a long walk to get to that light.

I’m talking the real Dark Ages.  Pre-2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ArtVanDelay said:

I’m talking the real Dark Ages.  Pre-2012.

Possibly even worse.  I was a kid when the Os won all the time....every time.  In the 80s.  I was spoiled.

 

90s were ok.

2000s total disaster.

Mid 2010s a pleasant surprise.

Late 2010s another disaster.

Now?   Walk into the light.......

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

People have better things to do than watch a 47-win baseball team.  I was still watching parts of games but certainly not 9 innings every night.

I didn't say otherwise.

I'm just over here spitting facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, OnlyOneOriole said:

Let me make this clear. 

I like Roy.

He in no way should be banned.

Not sure what else I can say.

 

34 minutes ago, OnlyOneOriole said:

But this is why I said last week in the thread you made about how the O's would get blown out by the Yankees that you are saying things lately that don't seem to be making much sense and many other posters would be banned by now for the same things.

Did you not post the bolded part? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, OnlyOneOriole said:

Possibly even worse.  I was a kid when the Os won all the time....every time.  In the 80s.  I was spoiled.

 

90s were ok.

2000s total disaster.

Mid 2010s a pleasant surprise.

Late 2010s another disaster.

Now?   Walk into the light.......

 

 

80s were great from 1980 to 1983. 1984 wasn't bad but the Tigers ruled. 1989 was Orioles Magic at it's finest. 1985 to 1988 were not very fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, OnlyOneOriole said:

You put into words what I was trying to convey better than I did.

 

He is like the O's hangout mascot.  He is so emo and trollish without trying to be trollish that it works for him. 

You don't even realize that you are putting Roy down when you say things like this. 

@Roy Firestone isn't a mascot. He's Hangout royalty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Jagwar said:

You don't even realize that you are putting Roy down when you say things like this. 

@Roy Firestone isn't a mascot. He's Hangout royalty. 

I guess that is my point.  If he wasn't a nationally known journalist who happened to be an Oriole fan but instead was just a normal everyday poster?

Would you say he is royalty?

I think we know the answer.  He would not be.    You know that.   And again, I really like Roy.  He is a super nice guy. 

I deal a lot in social media via you tube and instagram influencers from my part ownership in a fitness/cbd company, and I see this all of the time.   Social media people, most especially hot women but also pseudo celebs like Roy, get every break in the book when it comes to online postings.  People want to talk to them and get acknowledged by them.  It makes them feel good.  Hence why we pay to use them to promote products. 

Because people are suckers.

Edited by OnlyOneOriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ArtVanDelay said:

People have better things to do than watch a 47-win baseball team.  I was still watching parts of games but certainly not 9 innings every night.

I boycotted some of the dark Angelos years. Don’t know that I could ever stay away for very long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OnlyOneOriole said:

I guess that is my point.  If he wasn't a nationally known journalist who happened to be an Oriole fan but instead was just a normal everyday poster?

Would you say he is royalty?

I think we know the answer.  He would not be.    You know that.   And again, I really like Roy.  He is a super nice guy. 

I deal a lot in social media via you tube and instagram influencers from my part ownership in a fitness/cbd company, and I see this all of the time.   Social media people, most especially hot women but also pseudo celebs like Roy, get every break in the book when it comes to online postings.  People want to talk to them and get acknowledged by them.  It makes them feel good.  Hence why we pay to use them to promote products. 

Because people are suckers.

You make solid points in the second to last paragraph but then still succeed in alienating most people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, OnlyOneOriole said:

I guess that is my point.  If he wasn't a nationally known journalist who happened to be an Oriole fan but instead was just a normal everyday poster?

Would you say he is royalty?

I think we know the answer.  He would not be.    You know that.   And again, I really like Roy.  He is a super nice guy. 

I deal a lot in social media via you tube and instagram influencers from my part ownership in a fitness/cbd company, and I see this all of the time.   Social media people, most especially hot women but also pseudo celebs like Roy, get every break in the book when it comes to online postings.  People want to talk to them and get acknowledged by them.  It makes them feel good.  Hence why we pay to use them to promote products. 

Because people are suckers.

And that's the problem. You think a lot more of yourself than you should, and a lot more or Roy's place on the Hangout than you should.

 

EDIT: I meant a "Lot LESS" of Roy's place... blame the wine.

Edited by Jagwar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, joelala said:

You make solid points in the second to last paragraph but then still succeed in alienating most people. 

I don't mean suckers in a bad way.  More like they liked to be liked by the rich and famous and feel important because of it. 

 

It is just human nature.

 

It is why sites like ONLY FANS do so well.  Mainly the women.  So many men just want to be acknowledged by a pretty gjrl that they will pay money and humiliate themselves to have that happen.


Same on you tube with the Patreon's. 

Edited by OnlyOneOriole
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • If Elias could somehow magically combine Stowers and Kjerstad into one player, then the O's would really have something.  I think Kjerstad has a special bat, but his defense anywhere leaves a lot to be desired.  I don't know if Stowers can keep his Ks low enough to be an everyday player, but the O's should find out before Santander hits free agency.
    • Read the ninth post on page one I wrote. That should have been the last post in this dumpster fire of a thread. Lol
    • What if he bats .100 for the next month?
    • I agree. And I think he has a higher upside than Kjerstad because he's actually a very good fielder. He's a guy that I think deserves regular playing time.
    • Back when we DFA'd Bauman, I said the right move would have been sending down Akin. He's just not very good. Sure he'll tease you with a month or two of good ball but he's very average. Cano is Cano. He had his 15 minutes of fame. He intimidates no one. And that's what you need from a high leverage guy. Vieira --- no need mincing words here --- he's not just a project, he stinks. Everyone has tried to fix his command issue and everyone has failed.  On the other hand, while he's no Bautista I don't mind rolling with Kimbrel this year. I like Coulombe. I think Perez, Webb and Tate are "ok".  The overall issue is that this bullpen isn't the bullpen a championship squad needs. Elias should have known that. Maybe he thought the offense and starting pitching would make up for our bullpen deficiencies. No team is perfect, I get that. I just don't know how a guy as bright as Elias thought this bullpen would be good enough coming out of Spring Training. Let's hope he makes some moves to get us a couple quality relievers.
    • From my understanding of the data the impetus for pulling pitchers early is not (usually) due to pitcher fatigue or pitcher injury risk, but rather because they're not as good the 3rd/4th time thru the lineup.  But I think I'd rather have our starters go from good to mediocre the 3rd time thru the lineup, versus trusting the crappy members of our bullpen with the ball.  Granted Akin had a bad game today and he had been pretty good, but we also tried to have Cionel get thru 2 innings and he gives up a leadoff triple.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...