Jump to content

Are we actually 27-14 with the highest runs/game in the AL?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Just now, RarityFlaherty said:

So two playoff appearances and you’re ready to question his ability to close things out? I find it funny how so many are hesitant to make assumptions about players based on small sample sizes, but people are willing to make these huge assumptions about Elias based off of tiny sample sizes. People were also saying Elias couldn’t make a trade for a big name starter until he made the trade for Burnes.
 

And the playoffs are a crapshoot anyway. I’d give him at least a couple more years before I’m questioning whether or not he could get us to a world series. 

Boy you already had your reply ready no matter what I said eh?

And here I was thinking you were being reasonable for a change.

 

Yes, if two postseasons in a row he makes obviously questionable additions to the roster instead of more impactful moves despite having trade capital and payroll room it becomes a question.  How many more years to you give him at that point? 

Now do I think he's going to have a repeat of the 2023 deadline?  No I don't.  But if he does, he's opened the door to being criticized for it.

Let's be honest here, both the Flaherty and Fuji moves looked pretty questionable in real time, this isn't a case of hindsight. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

It’s open to discussion now.  I’ve seen it mentioned before.

And that’s how poorly run franchises do things. They are constantly in flux because they continue to change leadership when things don’t turn out as well as they’d hope. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

It’s open to discussion now.  I’ve seen it mentioned before.

I was responding to this.

56 minutes ago, interloper said:

Those people would be crazy. 

One person saying something and someone else calling them crazy...that's not discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

And that’s how poorly run franchises do things. They are constantly in flux because they continue to change leadership when things don’t turn out as well as they’d hope. 

Which isn't what would be happening in this very specific scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

No, but it should be open to discussion at that point.

 

Really? I dont imagine many GM's being able to do what Elias has accomplished here. So I wouldn't fire Elias over not making a great deadline trade, sorry. Thats a bit of a knee-jerk reaction.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two thoughts--

1, I think there are unrealistic expectations of what it's like to be a winning team. Great teams are good all the time, and they're good at every position on the field, right? Not necessarily. Winning teams--even elite teams--have weak links, cold streaks, and various types of adversity. The weak spots are worth attending to, but they don't mean the foundation is faltering. Some people react to the weak spots as if they are a smoking gun of impending doom, when really they're just a part of the marathon that great teams go through too. 

2, We're good enough that we're chasing championships. Each year only 1 team will succeed at that mission and 29 will fail. So there's a kind of fatalism that creeps in when the goal is something that requires so much to go right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Boy you already had your reply ready no matter what I said eh?

And here I was thinking you were being reasonable for a change.

 

Yes, if two postseasons in a row he makes obviously questionable additions to the roster instead of more impactful moves despite having trade capital and payroll room it becomes a question.  How many more years to you give him at that point? 

Now do I think he's going to have a repeat of the 2023 deadline?  No I don't.  But if he does, he's opened the door to being criticized for it.

Let's be honest here, both the Flaherty and Fuji moves looked pretty questionable in real time, this isn't a case of hindsight. 

What is that supposed to mean? What’s unreasonable about giving your GM more than two playoff appearances before you make that kind of decision? Like I said, being reactionary and constantly changing leadership is how poorly run franchises do things. I’m super optimistic about this team right now, but if we get rid of Elias because he doesn’t win us a World Series in his second playoff appearance, I’m going to be extremely pessimistic about this ownership team going forward. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Hold up a second.

If Elias comes out of this years trade deadline with the 2024 versions of Flaherty and Fuji and they wash out in the playoffs you don't think it's time to question his ability to close things out?

Those bullpen scenarios weren't part of RZNJ's initial comment. 

I was saying, yes, it would be crazy to call for Elias' head if the team gets bounced from the playoffs. I would be the first to engage in any fair criticism if that's the case AND he didn't make good deadline moves. But criticism is different from calling for the guy to be replaced. That would still register as a silly opinion to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jabba72 said:

Really? I dont imagine many GM's being able to do what Elias has accomplished here. So I wouldn't fire Elias over not making a great deadline trade, sorry. Thats a bit of a knee-jerk reaction.

We would be looking at him making multiple obviously questionable moves in consecutive years.  How many folks honestly liked either of the deals last season?

I'm not talking about trading for a guy and him under performing what was expected.  Flaherty was not good with the Cards last year and was trending down.  Fuji was below replacement level with the Angels.  They had assets to make more impactful moves and didn't.

If the goal is to stay in the playoff picture most of the time you don't have the discussion.  If the goal is to win a ring, you would start the discussion after two years of underwhelming additions.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

Those bullpen scenarios weren't part of RZNJ's initial comment. 

I was saying, yes, it would be crazy to call for Elias' head if the team gets bounced from the playoffs. I would be the first to engage in any fair criticism if that's the case AND he didn't make good deadline moves. But criticism is different from calling for the guy to be replaced. That would still register as a silly opinion to me. 

Sounds like we are not in disagreement.

Cool.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

What is that supposed to mean? What’s unreasonable about giving your GM more than two playoff appearances before you make that kind of decision? Like I said, being reactionary and constantly changing leadership is how poorly run franchises do things. I’m super optimistic about this team right now, but if we get rid of Elias because he doesn’t win us a World Series in his second playoff appearance, I’m going to be extremely pessimistic about this ownership team going forward. 

Who said anything about making a decision?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

What I meant to say is I don’t consider making the playoffs a lock.  SG started a thread yesterday like it’s a sure thing.

It’s not a lock yet.  Fangraphs has the O’s at 87.7%, so basically 7-1 odds in favor.  That feels close to right.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Who said anything about making a decision?

 

Well if you’re saying that after two disappointing playoff appearances that you are going to question his ability to close things out, then you have a decision to make whether you keep him or replace him. That’s just a ridiculous thing to start thinking about after only two playoff appearances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

We would be looking at him making multiple obviously questionable moves in consecutive years.  How many folks honestly liked either of the deals last season?

I'm not talking about trading for a guy and him under performing what was expected.  Flaherty was not good with the Cards last year and was trending down.  Fuji was below replacement level with the Angels.  They had assets to make more impactful moves and didn't.

If the goal is to stay in the playoff picture most of the time you don't have the discussion.  If the goal is to win a ring, you would start the discussion after two years of underwhelming additions.

 

I guess we could argue over what constitutes a trend but Flaherty, arguably, had his best month of the year in July (5 starts 3.03 ERA).  One could certainly argue that he was trending up at the time of the trade.

 

P.S.  Fuji was with the A’s.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I guess we could argue over what constitutes a trend but Flaherty, arguably, had his best month of the year in July (5 starts 3.03 ERA).  One could certainly argue that he was trending up at the time of the trade.

 

P.S.  Fuji was with the A’s.

Sorry, right the A's.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...