Jump to content

The July schedule


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

3 at Seattle (currently 47-39)

3 at Oakland (30-56)

Off Day

3 vs. Cubs (39-46)

3 vs. Yankees (54-32)

4-day all star break

3 at Texas (38-46)

Off Day

3 at Miami (30-54)

3 vs. San Diego (46-42)

4 vs. Toronto (including an opening doubleheader)(38-45)

That's 16 games vs. teams with losing records, only 9 vs. winning teams.  13 at home, 12 on the road.   Plenty of off days in there.   

I'd say 17-8 is a worthy goal.

The Yankees play 13 games with Boston and Tampa, 3 with us, 3 with the Phillies, 2 with the Mets, 3 with the Reds.  Only the Mets (40-41) and Reds (39-45) are below .500, with Tampa (42-42) right at .500.   

 

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good goal but that schedule is tougher than it appears. We know TX is better than that record. Toronto will always play us tough.  In Seattle is always very tough. Certainly 5-6 losses between just those three series is possible. 
 

Certainly easier than June both in opponent quality and perhaps more importantly, off days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

17-8 is a good goal.  I’m thinking 15-10 or 16-9 is more likely.

I never like getting ahead of myself, or assume we will dominate bad teams.  I know we had one poster who was saying we really should sweep Houston.  Uh, yeah.   

But honestly, we’re a .630 winning percentage team, and this is a soft part of our schedule.  15-10 would disappoint me greatly.  16-9 would be okay but a missed opportunity.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I never like getting ahead of myself, or assume we will dominate bad teams.  I know we had one poster who was saying we really should sweep Houston.  Uh, yeah.   

But honestly, we’re a .630 winning percentage team, and this is a soft part of our schedule.  15-10 would disappoint me greatly.  16-9 would be okay but a missed opportunity.   
 

I think you are underselling the month. Would you be unhappy if they went 3-3 to start this?  I’m honestly not expecting more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I think you are underselling the month. Would you be unhappy if they went 3-3 to start this?  I’m honestly not expecting more than that.

Unhappy with 3-3 would be an overstatement.  I’d be a little disappointed.   I don’t “expect” anything - I’m hoping for better.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2024 at 8:42 AM, LookinUp said:

I don't feel like doing the math, but does anyone have the opponent's winning percentage available for June and July? I can't believe the gauntlet the O's just went through.

MASN had a graphic that the June schedule was the 4th toughest SOS in that time frame and the 18-12 record was the 4th best in MLB.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • They are wasting way because they are major league ready players who are not on a major league team. They are wasting away because we can’t use them. We don’t have a place for them, but instead of trading them, we are letting them languish. It is silly not to find a trade partner for them. If the value is low, well, the value is low, and you get what you can. I was talking about neither Holliday nor Mayo, and I’m sorry I wasn’t clear enough. but you mentioned Stowers and Norby and you mentioned it exactly the problem that exists they’re not here because we don’t have room for them. I am one of the very few voices who wants mayo to remain where he is unless he develops worthwhile defense, although I would be happy to trade him.
    • Extended forecasts in Maryland are a fool's errand.  💦💨💭🌞 Show up, and pray!
    • I prefer he has to borrow a glove if he is forced into playing defense at all.
    • I think we’ve talked about this, but I would love to replace James McCann with Jonah Heim. Jonah Hime is a gold glove winner and even though he’s having a really bad offensive year compared to last year, he’s worlds better than McCann and would make it much easier to rest Adley more often. He has already been mentioned as a non-tender candidate because he’s apparently expecting a significant raise despite his mediocre season. Lowe might be as well, but it’s probably doubtful that they would move him now. The Rangers, as current champs, are going to take a huge PR hit if they trade anybody but their departing free agents. Half of their top 20 prospects are pitchers, but most have only 40-45 future values. All of their outfielders are scuffling right now, but they are all really good so I doubt they would make any outfield trades, and just hope for some improvement from their guys. I would love to get Robertson and Yates, and I wouldn’t mind Scherzer either. But we don’t have anybody they really need.
    • I have a ton of faith in the FO, but the way the poll was worded, had to cast my vote a little lower.   We won't know for years - if ever - which offers were made but rejected. Grayson has given everything I was hoping for from Bradish.  Burnes has exceeded the hype.  So, we need to replace the #3/#4 pitcher we expected Grayson to be.  Suarez is still a great surprise.  Kremer, in my mind, is trending upward.  A solid #3 would be thrilling. On the reliever front, one solid (non-elite) leverage-type reliever can push Tate/Baker/Akin back to Tidewater and make the whole BP look better.  And Coloumbe returns for the push. I guess I'm saying we don't need an ace and a closer, but a #3 and a 7th inning specialist.  Should be doable.
    • Faith.  I hope he trades all of the prospects that are clearly blocked, and get some players we can use. 
    • Hays has certainly hit a lot better lately but he is just feasting on LHP’s. His wRC+ against RHP’s is 73, so he should not be taking any AB’s away against RHP’s from Cowser (or Mullins/Kjerstad/Santander assuming they are all healthy).  So much has been made about Cowser’s offense (for good reason) that it seems like the fact that he’s been the best defensive player on the team on a per game basis gets lost. With his defense and base running value, he doesn’t even have to be a great hitter to be valuable, like Kjerstad. His floor is closer to Mullins, yet it seems like he’s judged very differently. Put another way, if Mullins had Cowser’s overall offensive line right now, with his exit velo’s and quality of contact, nobody would be calling for him to lose playing time. It just seems odd that a rookie that has been so good defensively and has so many good offensive qualities (average exit velocity, chase rate, barrel %) is getting so much heat right now. He definitely does need to be better with RISP and in high leverage situations, and shouldn’t get an unlimited leash, but he’s not going to get better unless he keeps getting chances to work things out. And if he does work things out (as we saw in April) or even can replicate his season line to date the rest of the way, he’s likely the most valuable OF’er on the team. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...