Jump to content

Unconventional Thinking: A Quick Sell Off


ScGO's

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Orioles0615 said:

No one imagined losing all these pitchers?

Everyone did once the Bradish and Means injuries were announced. Elias made this mess with lack of pitching depth and now has to dig us out. Everyone knew they needed another starter after Burnes and another relief picther.  

He did bring in Burnes. where does he put all the BP additions, with Danny and Wells not being injured until after the season started?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ScGO's said:

Here me out

No one imagined losing all these pitchers and now I see all the suggestions about trading our top prospects for MLB arms and I'm having nightmares that were going to pull a Padres and waste the #1 system by making trigger happy trades

Elias (all of us) may have to accept that we just don't have the pitching to be WS contenders, nor can we justify selling off the system too early to try and rush it after the long rebuild 

We also have the problem of having too many position players including blocked prospects, and it's getting counter productive 

I'd rather sell  for some young pitching than buy MLB arms at the cost of our young guns. Do we trade Burnes for a top 100 pitcher prospect? Mountcastle for Woo? Trade Santander, Hays, Kimbrell, Urias, Mateo, Mullins, and O'hearn for controllable pitching pieces?

Let the young guns finish the season. They still might make playoffs. But overall we are better set for 25 and 26 as we cleared veteran road blocks in exchange for the to ng pitching we lack

In the off-season, sign Burnes and tweak the roster as needed, but overall, our young offense is probably set for years, and now we have pitching depth, Burnes, grod, woo, etc

Not saying they SHOULD do this, but if the slide continues, do they consider it?

 

 

I applaud you for sharing your idea because it was, as you explained, unconventional.  Being a lone voice of (possible) dissent in a crowd is never easy, and subject to few thoughtful replies, with dismissive replies abundant.  You clearly stated that IF the slide continued, you believe your idea has merit, and that you wanted to see what others thought.  You got what you asked for, especially with folks a bit more surly than normal with the recent slump. :P

With all of that said, even if, over the next 15 games before the trade deadline, we lost 12+, we would still be in the race for the playoffs.  So, I would not 'throw away' the season and begin preparations for 2025>, but instead, I'd fight for it.   I believe giving up on the season by selling off important pieces to our chances for success this season sends the exact wrong message to our young players.  This is a competition.  These young men are competing to win, and management should do what it can to help them achieve success.   And, frankly, in most cases there are bumps on the road to success.  Slumps happen, but unless something catastrophic occurs on the injury front, I'm in it to win it.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

I applaud you for sharing your idea because it was, as you explained, unconventional.  Being a lone voice of (possible) dissent in a crowd is never easy, and subject to few thoughtful replies, with dismissive replies abundant.  You clearly stated that IF the slide continued, you believe your idea has merit, and that you wanted to see what others thought.  You got what you asked for, especially with folks a bit more surly than normal with the recent slump. :P

With all of that said, even if, over the next 15 games before the trade deadline, we lost 12+, we would still be in the race for the playoffs.  So, I would not 'throw away' the season and begin preparations for 2025>, but instead, I'd fight for it.   I believe giving up on the season by selling off important pieces to our chances for success this season sends the exact wrong message to our young players.  This is a competition.  These young men are competing to win, and management should do what it can to help them achieve success.   And, frankly, in most cases there are bumps on the road to success.  Slumps happen, but unless something catastrophic occurs on the injury front, I'm in it to win it.

Frankly, I enjoyed reading the OP.  It doesn't matter whether I agree or not... or think I know better.  I also agree with Greg's - don't give up on 2024.  

p.s. I must say - when I first saw the thread "How important is this Yankees series, really?" from June I laughed because I want to beat the MFYs in every game, inning, pitch.  Being humiliated is too good for them and they can take their media fans with them  😀  So, in my eyes, this was not knee jerk.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Osornot said:

Frankly, I enjoyed reading the OP.  It doesn't matter whether I agree or not... or think I know better.  I also agree with Greg's - don't give up on 2024.  

p.s. I must say - when I first saw the thread "How important is this Yankees series, really?" from June I laughed because I want to beat the MFYs in every game, inning, pitch.  Being humiliated is too good for them and they can take their media fans with them  😀  So, in my eyes, this was not knee jerk.

 

It just has a 0% chance of actually happening 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did this ‘slide’ run to more than four games when I wasn’t paying attention?  It’s a slump, a down period. One that will end soon enough, even if not today or tomorrow. Every team goes through it. 
 

I mean, selling our ace while we’re in first place?  WTF. Can’t we just have nice things NOW and not wait until next year AGAIN?  I get it’s a discussion board and some topics are nothing more than conversation starters, but Yeesh. There is a less than zero chance that happens. 
 

Also Seattle would never trade Woo for Mountie. If they would that wouldn’t even be considered ‘selling’ in the traditional sense anyway, and that trade would probably already be done  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the injuries and current roster, despite our pace to match last year’s record, can create some doubt about possible post-season success. 

That said, I don’t ever like giving up on a season — there are only so many chances to make a run in October. 

I’m not saying we stay the course no matter what, but a first place team half-way through the season needs to find ways to improve the roster for 2024, not a sell off and and surrender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are below 500 teams that are not considering selling because they know all they have to do is get into the playoffs and anything can happen. We’d have to lose another 20 games in a row to even be at that level. If we were five games above 500 then this OP would have some merit as a ‘what if’ type speculation. But we’re still 20 games over. The idea of selling Burnes and punting on 2024 isn’t a thought experiment or outside the box - it’s just absurd.

You get in, you ride your best five ish pitchers (which includes a really good top two starters, one of the best 1-2 combos in the league) if you have to, and you hope the lineup - one of the best in the league mind you - doesn’t all go cold in the playoffs like it has this week. What else can you ask for? You’re going to sell that opportunity?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This slump definitely has me concerned. 8-12 over their last 20, with 4 losses most recent. It's starting to resemble something more. If we just had someone that could step up as a #3, I'd feel alot more confident. The lineup doesn't worry me just the back of the rotation and the bullpen. Maybe every other teams going through it too, I dont know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the OP is an interesting one. Obviously, the O's are a much better team with Burnes on it, but for the sake of the experiment, if they did sell him at the deadline, he'd easily get a massive package in return. He's set to make 10-12 more starts in the regular season, they could probably weather that storm and sneak into the playoffs, but that is where he'd really be missed. 

Burnes would make any true contender probably the odds on favorite, imagine him in the Phillies rotation. Not going to happen, but it's a nice thought experiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see selling some pieces to "reload" and to reset a contending team's window.  I guess you'd hope with good drafting and savvy moves you can keep the window open perpetually, and sometimes that will involve shipping a favorite out.  But if you can make the playoffs, anything can happen.  Even if the O's continue to slide hard, they're still going to be in the hunt for the wild card.  The OP seems to be suggesting raising the white flag, basically, which I think would be malpractice in this situation.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Three Run Homer said:

If we keep losing and fall out of wild card position by the end of July, I would at least entertain this idea.  Burnes would be by far the biggest catch in the market.   I would also consider it if GrayRod got hurt.  

They would have to lose just about every game the rest of the month for that to be the case.  I don’t think that is going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

Losing Bradish and Means has really hurt us.  We were unbeatable with those guys.  We are going through what the Yankees went through last year, with all their injuries.  Injuries can kill any team in every sport.

I suppose this was my point with the opening post: Elias has to assess on whether the unforeseen pitching losses have put us a year back in the rebuild plan (essentially back on pace as I feel we were year ahead)

I hope they figure it out this season, but if we go into next season with 2 less of Kjerstad, Mayo, Basallo and Holliday, I'll be bummed

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...