Jump to content

Grade the Eflin Trade


Frobby

Grade the Eflin trade   

144 members have voted

  1. 1. Grade the Eflin trade


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 07/28/24 at 06:06

Recommended Posts

I said love it because I can't judge a trade on what was done or not done otherwise. This is a great trade. We gave up nothing of real significance and got a legit starter for a year and 1/2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B for Orioles, A for Rays. The Orioles gave up too much for a pitcher with a plus 4.00 ERA. The Hays trade was awful; a decent outfielder for two bums. 

On the subject of trades, if the O's surrender Holliday, Kjerstad, or Mayo for anyone, they are out of their minds. Trade Basallo and/or Bradfield instead. Of the MLB roster, get rid of Mullins, Urias, Mateo, Pache, and Perez, if anyone takes them. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have rather kept Etzel and packaged Bradfield to see what we could have gotten.   I think Etzel was the CF of the future for the O's.   I don't think Bradfield will ever make the bigs for Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Motorhead said:

B for Orioles, A for Rays. The Orioles gave up too much for a pitcher with a plus 4.00 ERA. The Hays trade was awful; a decent outfielder for two bums. 

On the subject of trades, if the O's surrender Holliday, Kjerstad, or Mayo for anyone, they are out of their minds. Trade Basallo and/or Bradfield instead. Of the MLB roster, get rid of Mullins, Urias, Mateo, Pache, and Perez, if anyone takes them. 

Interesting the way you group the players you like and the players you don’t like. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Interesting the way you group the players you like and the players you don’t like. 

You're confused? I only grouped the players into ones I felt were expendable. Are you going to tell me anyone I mentioned on the MLB roster is worth keeping? As for Basallo, who is a C/1B, why do we need him with Rutschman behind the plate and Mayo available for 1B, unless he gets traded which would be a horrible mistake.  (Mountcastle is expendable as well, what with his poor OBP) 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Motorhead said:

You're confused? I only grouped the players into ones I felt were expendable. Are you going to tell me anyone I mentioned on the MLB roster is worth keeping? As for Basallo, who is a C/1B, why do we need him with Rutschman behind the plate and Mayo available for 1B, unless he gets traded which would be a horrible mistake.  (Mountcastle is expendable as well, what with his poor OBP) 

Because the future plan of the team is likely RF/DH-Kjerstad, 1B/C/DH-Basallo, 1B/3B/DH-Mayo and then you can DH Rutschman heck of a lot more than they do this year as Basallo can catch Vs. righties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This tidbit was nice to see:

 

When the New York Yankees, their fans, their players and their front office heard that Zach Eflin had been traded away from their division rival Tampa Bay Rays, the city was able to let out a sigh of relief. Eflin has been notorious for throwing incredibly well against the Yankees.

Over the course of his career, Eflin has made eight starts against the Bronx Bombers. In those eight starts, he's 3-3 with a 2.11 ERA over 47 innings. He's holding a notoriously strong offensive team to a below-average slash line of .224/.269/.310.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we are seeing play out, is the draft the bats and trade for the arms doesn't work

The Orioles are way out of balance, hitting prospects vs pitching prospects, LH hitters vs. RH hitters.

No fixing this mess this year, or maybe even in the offseason.

Maybe next GM will use draft capital on the most important commodity in baseball, pitching

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Motorhead said:

B for Orioles, A for Rays. The Orioles gave up too much for a pitcher with a plus 4.00 ERA. The Hays trade was awful; a decent outfielder for two bums. 

On the subject of trades, if the O's surrender Holliday, Kjerstad, or Mayo for anyone, they are out of their minds. Trade Basallo and/or Bradfield instead. Of the MLB roster, get rid of Mullins, Urias, Mateo, Pache, and Perez, if anyone takes them. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eflin adds needed quality depth to the rotation.  He's a LHP option as a #3 in the playoffs if the script calls for it.  He gives us an arm for 2025 too.  

Ideally for 2024, there's a bigger whale.

The cost is fine.  I do think all 3 of those we gave up will be MLBers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This trade immediately upgraded our team and rotation, which was a huge need. We gave up 3 guys that probably would not have seen the Orioles roster in the next 2+ years or ever. Love it. And I hope we're not done. 

I find it funny when we complain about "wish we didnt give up _____"

None of these guys are our "guys." We cant even find time for Mayo and Holliday (or Norby before the Mateo injury) and we're worried about Mac Horvath (no offense to Mac)? Mac is OLDER than Mayo, Holliday and Gunnar by the way, and will be blocked by Gunnar/Westy/Mayo/Norby+ for the next several years if we keep them around. I hope he goes and has a great career in the MLB, but it shouldnt affect the Orioles one bit. 

You've got to give something up to get something, and we need to seriously upgrade the 2024 Orioles while not mortgaging the future and this trade fit all of the criteria.

Edited by terpoh
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
    • I think Young will be added, and that is it. I like Pham, but no AAA experience makes him unlikely to be taken. Whatever open spots should be used to upgrade the bullpen and other pitching depth. It is well documented here that we don’t have much beyond raw guys like Strowd and Heid. we lack flexibility and options. This has to change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...