Jump to content

Anyone else feel like we were tipping pitches or something tonight?


interloper

Recommended Posts

Cleveland batters were on EVERY fastball in the zone from Rogers, Suarez, and Webb. I'm not normally one for conspiracy theory but the kinds of swings they were getting off started to feel a little weird. I also saw one runner at 2B make an arm motion like the pitch was going to be outside and then it was. 

Dunno, might just be sucky pitching from us but I've watched darn near every game this year and this one felt weird to me. 

🤷‍♂️

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, interloper said:

Cleveland batters were on EVERY fastball in the zone from Rogers, Suarez, and Webb. I'm not normally one for conspiracy theory but the kinds of swings they were getting off started to feel a little weird. I also saw one runner at 2B make an arm motion like the pitch was going to be outside and then it was. 

Dunno, might just be sucky pitching from us but I've watched darn near every game this year and this one felt weird to me. 

🤷‍♂️

All three homers came with a man on 2nd, and none of them came on center-cut pitches.  In fact, Ramirez' pulled a pitch that was low and outside.  So maybe you are on to something.

O's need to change their signs.  To start with, they need to signal an outside fastball and then plunk someone in the ribs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, here's some quick and dirty information from MLB.com on Cleveland's OPS in different situations.   

Overall, their OPS is 0.714, 13th in MLB.

With bases empty, their OPS is 0.667, 18th in MLB

With a runner on first, their OPS is 0.720, 19th in MLB.

With a runner on first and third, their OPS is 0.616, 30th in MLB

With a runner on third, their OPS is 0.961, 2nd in MLB.

With a runner on 2nd, their OPS is 0.808, 4th in MLB

With a runner on 1st and 2nd, their OPS is 0.919, 2nd in MLB

With a runner on 2nd and 3rd, their OPS is 0.880, 11th in MLB

With bases loaded, their OPS is 0.708, 18th in MLB.

The correlation is not perfect, but it does seem that overall they overperform in situations with a runner on 2nd base relative to other configurations,.  

It would be interesting to look at more tape to see if we can find more evidence of signaling from the runner on 2nd.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

All three homers came with a man on 2nd, and none of them came on center-cut pitches.  In fact, Ramirez' pulled a pitch that was low and outside.  So maybe you are on to something.

O's need to change their signs.  To start with, they need to signal an outside fastball and then plunk someone in the ribs.  

Don't they use an electronic device nowadays?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RavensNOsGuy said:

This team just isn’t that good. They will probably make the playoffs unless they collapse but it’s not as good of a team as last year. The pitching and general hitting approach against any decent teams is marginal at best. 

Good grief man. The Orioles are 38-28 against teams with a greater than .500 record. One of the very best records in baseball. They are meh right now for sure, but don’t ignore the real results. Check out how other top teams are doing against >.500 records. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, here's some quick and dirty information from MLB.com on Cleveland's OPS in different situations.   

Overall, their OPS is 0.714, 13th in MLB.

With bases empty, their OPS is 0.667, 18th in MLB

With a runner on first, their OPS is 0.720, 19th in MLB.

With a runner on first and third, their OPS is 0.616, 30th in MLB

With a runner on third, their OPS is 0.961, 2nd in MLB.

With a runner on 2nd, their OPS is 0.808, 4th in MLB

With a runner on 1st and 2nd, their OPS is 0.919, 2nd in MLB

With a runner on 2nd and 3rd, their OPS is 0.880, 11th in MLB

With bases loaded, their OPS is 0.708, 18th in MLB.

The correlation is not perfect, but it does seem that overall they overperform in situations with a runner on 2nd base relative to other configurations,.  

It would be interesting to look at more tape to see if we can find more evidence of signaling from the runner on 2nd.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I guess so, but a runner on 2nd can signal where the catcher is setting up and perhaps can read the pitcher's grip on the ball.  

Orioles catchers set up with target in middle of plate before moving toward corner after pitcher has already started his motion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Cleveland batters were on EVERY fastball in the zone from Rogers, Suarez, and Webb. I'm not normally one for conspiracy theory but the kinds of swings they were getting off started to feel a little weird. I also saw one runner at 2B make an arm motion like the pitch was going to be outside and then it was. 

Dunno, might just be sucky pitching from us but I've watched darn near every game this year and this one felt weird to me. 

🤷‍♂️

It certainly felt like that, didn’t it?  I think CLE just sat dead red and teed off. Let’s see if Kremer alters approach tomorrow and throws breaking balls + splitters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Say O! said:

Orioles catchers set up with target in middle of plate before moving toward corner after pitcher has already started his motion. 

But that would give the runner on 2nd time to make a gesture to the hitter before the ball is released, wouldn't it?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember a pitcher recently who balked a guy from second to third on purpose exactly because of this issue.

Does anyone remember that? Who was the pitcher and what were the teams? Was Cleveland involved?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Uli2001 said:

I remember a pitcher recently who balked a guy from second to third on purpose exactly because of this issue.

Does anyone remember that? Who was the pitcher and what were the teams? Was Cleveland involved?

It was Craig Kimbrell!  He did it last year against the Marlins.  I've also seen a video of Kenley Jansen doing it against the Cubs.  Pitchers are well aware that a runner on 2nd creates the potential for skulduggery.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Has it gotten devalued, or just harder to do?   I would far prefer a .260-.280 average BA to today’s .244.   I do think that one reason BAs are lower is that batters are emphasizing swinging for power.  But the bigger reason is, pitchers have just gotten bettter.  They throw harder, with more spin, and have a wider array of pitches than ever before.  It’s harder and harder to make solid contact, so if you do, be sure to hit it hard.    By the way, I have a simple way to raise batting averages by 10+ points: bring in the robo-umps and eliminate the 12% of called strikes that are actually balls.  Yes, the 4% of called strikes that are actually balls also will go away, but the net advantage to the hitters will be significant.  And the beauty is, you’re not changing the rules of the game or the strike zone.   You’re improving enforcement of the actual strike zone.  Do it!  
    • His career numbers are pretty much as identical as they can get from either side, and his season numbers are not that different either. .837 OPS lefty, .793 OPS righty this year.
    • And the thing is it's not like the Orioles have only been struggling just in September but since about mid June. I'm not sure if Texas or Arizona played like 6 games under 500 as the Orioles have for 3 months but if they did feel free to tell me. 
    • Yeah it's interesting because we thought the run D would struggle and the pass D would be a strength. The run D has been very solid through 2 games. 
    • I’m going straight positive on his potential and his trend was going up before the trade. Jake Flaherty comes to mind, based on IP maxing out before the trade. But Roger’s is more a deception Povich type lefty.    Believe ME is going on bounce back potential with a full season in. This guy could be a #3. This was a glad you can pitch season for Rogers.   As a #567 SP, will take it. I like Stowers off the plate hit capability and that is missing in this lineup to some degree. will be following this for years, hopefully! Norby too, as a natural hitter. We need contact hitters!
    • I don't dislike them at all or I wouldn't be here but I'm not going to pretend everything is fine and dandy like some of you do 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...