Jump to content

Rubenstein: Orioles will speed up the effort to get to a World Series


waroriole

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, 24fps said:

Once again Elias describes the process rather than answer the question(s).  Rubenstein has the same option but instead made more of a committment even if it wasn't as specific as it could have been.  I'll take that as progress - it certainly is compared to John Angelos.

Right now what I really need to see is a compelling argument that $150 million shouldn't be the budgetary starting point for a highly competitive team AL East team that's no longer in rebuild mode.  I don't think there is one.  Even Peter Angelos understood that competitive teams need more monetary support.

They don’t need to spend 150M.  They have won almost 200 games the last 2 years without spending that much money.

Now, I think the long term budget should be in the 130-175 range.  No reason they can’t do that. But there is plenty of reason right now why they don’t have to.

As I have mentioned, the Os have about an 82M payroll right now, for 21ish players (that includes Mounty being traded)

A few of the spots left aren’t ones that will make much money, like backup C.

So, there is only so much they can do to get into the 150 range anyway.

Obviously they could sign 2 big starters or go after Soto. Soto is likely not realistic and not sure how smart that would be anyways.

 

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why so much negativity about the article. He basically said he’s old so if he wants to see his team win it all, he’s going to have to amp up the effort to do so. To me that sounds like throwing money out there to spend on payroll. 
 

Now, does he have to show us rather than just saying it?  Of course. But a quote like that is a helluva lot better than anything Angelos ever said on the topic. I for one appreciate the seeming sense of urgency. 
 

That being said We also need to keep in mind that this offseason isn’t going to be the last offseason ever. Just because there’s no huge contract (if that’s how it turns out) or extension doesn’t mean that there never will be. 
 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

Not sure why so much negativity about the article. He basically said he’s old so if he wants to see his team win it all, he’s going to have to amp up the effort to do so. To me that sounds like throwing money out there to spend on payroll. 
 

Now, does he have to show us rather than just saying it?  Of course. But a quote like that is a helluva lot better than anything Angelos ever said on the topic. I for one appreciate the seeming sense of urgency. 
 

That being said We also need to keep in mind that this offseason isn’t going to be the last offseason ever. Just because there’s no huge contract (if that’s how it turns out) or extension doesn’t mean that there never will be. 
 

Agreed. I thought it was a decent take, the new owner wants playoff success sooner, rather than later. As O’s fans, we’ve heard it before, at various times, so I also see why some are a little cynical.

I don’t think DR is going to break the bank, but I do think this will be a more interesting off season than most. And, I go back and forth everyday myself on whether I would sign Burnes to a long term deal or extend Gunnar into the insane money/years level. The upside is, I think we have some good options, good young players, some money to spend and an owner who is also a fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Emory Eagle said:

They better bc I’m not sure you could have scripted a less enjoyable MLB season in which the Os make the playoffs than this one.  Morale is low.

I think everyone will be excited when spring training starts and then OD. 
 

Higher expectations now. More frustration.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Anyone consider that maybe if Rubenstein wants to win a World Series now, he might be less likely to offer extensions to our young players and more likely to add talent from outside?

It’s a thought for sure — but I imagine he will still defer to Elias as to the how. This could show us how much Elias wants to keep any of the kids or if he utilizes them in trades to get the roster to where he wants it.

I really think the Hot Stove season offers some intrigue this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

I think Rubenstein and Elias are going to shock the (Oriole) world. 

A lifetime of fandom and I wouldn’t be shocked if they spend a bunch — nor would I be surprised if they only make a couple moves. I kind of hope I get shocked with an extension or two and a helpful FA or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

They don’t need to spend 150M.  They have won almost 200 games the last 2 years without spending that much money.

Now, I think the long term budget should be in the 130-175 range.  No reason they can’t do that. But there is plenty of reason right now why they don’t have to.

As I have mentioned, the Os have about an 82M payroll right now, for 21ish players (that includes Mounty being traded)

A few of the spots left aren’t ones that will make much money, like backup C.

So, there is only so much they can do to get into the 150 range anyway.

Obviously they could sign 2 big starters or go after Soto. Soto is likely not realistic and not sure how smart that would be anyways.

 

If the opening day payroll is $130 million and it was deployed intellegently, I probably won't complain.  But if I start hearing about reasonable deals for positions of need like SP that the O's weren't in on that might change in a hurry. 

I don't think the O's get Soto either, nor should they if the estimates we're starting to hear about his price tag are even close.  I can see him staying in the AL East though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 24fps said:

If the opening day payroll is $130 million and it was deployed intellegently, I probably won't complain.  But if I start hearing about reasonable deals for positions of need like SP that the O's weren't in on that might change in a hurry. 

 

What does this mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I used the word "need" twice in a two-paragraph post.  That's a lot?  I think you're being unfair, so if you don't mind, I'm going to continue until I get my money's worth.  Who know, at the end I might even have a more refined vocabulary for my trouble. Put me firmly in the camp that believes the O's need to replace Burnes' production if they want maintain 2024's success.  I think they need to move on from Santander and I would prefer someone right-handed who's not a pure DH.  I think the O's need another solid back-end bullpen piece to go along with Bautista although I certainly think that's a place where Kimbrel scale money would be wasted. If you think a contract around 7/200 for Burnes is "stupid money" fine, you'll get lot of agreement here.  But not from me.  In this day and age that's fair market value for a pitcher of his caliber and people need to stop acting like the O's have no business swimming in that end of the pool.  Just to be clear, nowhere in this thread have I advocated spending for the sake of spending.  I do like your suggestion of $130-$175 million as a sustainable target, even though I think it's likely to end up being low if the O's continue to be competitive - which makes this an argument I'd happily revisit in the future.
    • The Yankee offense with a hot Stanton is an entirely different beast over what they had for most of the season.
    • What damage? They might have missed out on two draft picks ( I don't think anyone would have coughed up a pick for Trumbo). Aside from that any damage past 2018 was self inflicted.  They could have cut both of them in 2018.  The money owed didn't cause a loss of profitability post 2018.
    • There is a middle ground between being perpetual losers and signing multiple $35M+ guys in free agency. Angelos actually did way more damage to the Orioles by spending stupidly on guys like Davis and Trumbo than he did by underspending. The rebuild was brutal but was a necessary process.  I do not think we should be in rebuild mode forever and would not be opposed to signing Burnes, who I did not mention in the post that wildcard responded to.
    • https://www.mlb.com/orioles/roster/40-man   This is the current 40 man roster. If we are only looking at players under team control for 2025(ie no Burnes or Santander, for example) , how many members of the current 40 man roster do you think should be on the OD 26 man roster. I have said I believe we have about 21 spots locked up for 2025. I personally believe it should be less than that but I don’t think the Os would agree. What do you think? Who do you want kept and who do you want gone?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...