Jump to content

Taking a look at some early mock drafts...


Recommended Posts

I generally think mocks are fun, but unless you put the time in to research team draft strategies and even reach out to see who organizations are generally looking at, they aren't very useful. Fun to bat around ideas, but to be honest I'd rather just read sites that rank the prospects, which I think would be more useful. Of course, mocks are done by authors who are compiling rather than evaluating (which is fine) so I guess the value of the "rankings" would be a bit questionable, too.

Shrug...

Yeah, I guess that's what makes this time of year so fun. If you asked 10 guys what their top 10 is, you'll get 10 different lists. I have a hard time seeing Matzek at 8, but if you think:

Strasburg, Ackley, Crow, Scheppers, White, Gibson, Tate, Purke...I can see scenarios where it's possible, just not likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yeah, I guess that's what makes this time of year so fun. If you asked 10 guys what their top 10 is, you'll get 10 different lists. I have a hard time seeing Matzek at 8, but if you think:

Strasburg, Ackley, Crow, Scheppers, White, Gibson, Tate, Purke...I can see scenarios where it's possible, just not likely.

Yeah, it may not be likely. But it's certainly possible.

I also think Green is getting a little nitpicked, and wouldn't be surprised if someone ends up very happy with him in the 7-10 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it may not be likely. But it's certainly possible.

I also think Green is getting a little nitpicked, and wouldn't be surprised if someone ends up very happy with him in the 7-10 range.

Totally concur. I see him as a solid, but not spectacular guy. Someone that will hit you .275 15HR and 75rbi from a premium position. Drew doesn't hit much more than that and look at how high he went.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we take Gibson with Matzek and Purke available, I'll be extremely disappointed...

With his higher BB totals and lower velocity, Gibson has bust written all over him.

He has safe, not bust written all over him. He'll end up being one of those solid guys that eats innings but doesn't make an all-star game. There are plenty of them drafted in the first round. From someone who complains that we absolutely have to make sure to draft someone who makes it to the majors, it seems funny that you'd have a problem with someone that seems one of the best bets to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Gibson is one of the safest we could draft. He still has good projectability too. I do not like the pick at 1:5 if we did take him, but I could think of an argument or 2 for us to take him so high. Im really liking Scheppers, possibly Crow or one of the HS pitchers.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Gibson is one of the safest we could draft. He still has good projectability too. I do not like the pick at 1:5 if we did take him, but I could think of an argument or 2 for us to take him so high. Im really liking Scheppers, possibly Crow or one of the HS pitchers.....

At this point, I'm just hoping we take pitching. Outside of Ackley I don't see a bat that I can even call equal value for half of these guys at 1:5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, I'm just hoping we take pitching. Outside of Ackley I don't see a bat that I can even call equal value for half of these guys at 1:5.

With still a lot of time to change my mind . . . I think I am lining up like this right now from our perspective:

1. Strasburg

2. Matzek

3. Ackley

4. White

5. Gibson

6. Green

7. Tate (would be ahead of Green if we did not have a decent set of OF at the moment)

8. Crow

9. Purke

10. Miller

I think on that short list . . . Green, Crow, and Miller have the best chance to rush up. Ackley, White, and Tate have the best chance to drop down.

I reserve the privilege to completely change this order within the next 6 weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though comps are usually a bunch of crap, you have to love Gibson's major league comp of Lackey. :)

I still don't see that one. Lackey throws a good 5-6MPH harder. Gibson has a chance to add a little more to his frame and get another 1-2 mph, but I don't ever see him really having a "power fastball".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't see that one. Lackey throws a good 5-6MPH harder. Gibson has a chance to add a little more to his frame and get another 1-2 mph, but I don't ever see him really having a "power fastball".

Who are comp'ing these guys?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With still a lot of time to change my mind . . . I think I am lining up like this right now from our perspective:

1. Strasburg

2. Matzek

3. Ackley

4. White

5. Gibson

6. Green

7. Tate (would be ahead of Green if we did not have a decent set of OF at the moment)

8. Crow

9. Purke

10. Miller

I think on that short list . . . Green, Crow, and Miller have the best chance to rush up. Ackley, White, and Tate have the best chance to drop down.

I reserve the privilege to completely change this order within the next 6 weeks.

You want us to select Gibson or is that who you think the Orioles will select? I would bet my bottom dollar that Scheppers ends up somewhere in the top 10. Some folks are saying he may go as high as #2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want us to select Gibson or is that who you think the Orioles will select? I would bet my bottom dollar that Scheppers ends up somewhere in the top 10. Some folks are saying he may go as high as #2.

This is me valuing the players. This is not a prediction where people will go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would argue he's the best athlete in the entire draft.

He's raw, and would certainly take much longer to reach the Majors. But having watched the video of him all I can say is "Holy @#$@#$!".

He might be worthy of a 5th pick. I suspect the O's will look at a pitcher with the pick as there are plenty to choose from - Crow, Scheppers, Matzek, Purke, etc... I suspect Ackley will be gone, and Green will have scared us off with his senior year. Plus, I know Jordan LOVES those toolsy high school types....Might we end up with Tate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • So you give up 2 top 100 prospects for 2 seasons and a limited second half? I’m glad you’re not in control. I know we’re currently a bit spoiled with the tanking and better front office. But I don’t see why you’d want to give up 3-4 players that include 2 of those guys. 
    • I’ll be sure to do that, though hopefully he won’t give anyone a reason to jump off. It’s kind of interesting to compare his power to Cowser’s.   Cowser has the type where when he really barrels it up, he absolutely destroys a ball, often 440 feet or more.  But Kjerstad has the type where he can hit homers even when he gets a little under the ball.  You initially don’t think it will carry, and then it clears the fence rather easily.   I don’t see that with Cowser, he has less margin for error.   
    • I don't think Elias will trade Westburg. For me he is the O's starting LF next year.    Mostly because he is easier to change positions than Holliday or Mayo. LF/3B/2B Westburg,   CF/OF Cowser,  RF/DH Kjerstad I think likely targets for Elias are Scherzer or Flaherty.    Either could be a #3 the way they are pitching.   I would see Elias extending Flaherty before he becomes a FA. Both the Rangers and Tigers are likely sellers at the deadline. Elias can probably get either starter without trading Holliday, Basallo, Mayo or Kjerstad. Bradfield, Norby, Stowers, Beavers, Fabian, Hovarth, Pham are among the players I see as most tradable. The thought of trading Monthcastle or Santander at the deadline does not seem likely at all to me.
    • Great step for McDermott but hopefully he can follow this up with a few good starts. Seems like between he, Povich and Johnson we have some real Jeckyl and Hyde guys. One day they are the best pitcher in International League and the next they can’t get through 3 innings.
    • My thinking is very few broadcasters should be in the O's HOF, and only reserved for great broadcasters with long tenures and who were loved by the fans.  Using that criteria, I'd only have Chuck Thompson and Jon Miller in the O's HOF.  I think it cheapens the award to have Manfra and Angel in it.  If those two guys made it, then why not Mel Proctor??  IMO, he was a much better baseball broadcaster than either of them, even though he had a relatively short tenure. As for Thorne, he's a very good broadcaster in general but he made way too many obvious mistakes and didn't know baseball well at all.
    • 17-8 is a good goal.  I’m thinking 15-10 or 16-9 is more likely.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...