Jump to content

Signings update from Roch


Recommended Posts

He had tendonitis. You can have a clean and smooth delivery and still get tendonitis. And on top of that, its not a serious injury to the point of which you dont gain your velo back from. All it is is an inflamed tendon, something that occurs with overuse, or not necessarily even overuse, just pitching normally can cause tendonitis. I have had tendonitis in maultiple parts in my arm when I used to pitch....

And he still is projectable, he still has room in his frame to add more weight and gain more velo. You dont have to be in HS, some people develop later than others.

I agree with you on signing the top 10 pitchers aside from Berry. Id like to have Berry, but I wouldnt lose any sleep over it if we ended up not signing him. He doesnt seem much different than Berken.....

I agree he is still projectionable, and of course you don't have to be in HS to have projection, I was just stating that he is a JuCo guy and not a high school arm. Also, with an injury, where there's smoke, there's fire. So even though his injury is small, I hope he can avoid this type of stuff in the future. I really think Cowan could be a very good prospect, I'm excited that he's now part of the organization.

On to Berry, I think he has better secondary offerings than Berken, but his motion and injury history scare me. If his motion was cleaner and his risk of injury was low, then he'd be a no brainer, but as it stands now I wouldn't give him more than 600K. It'd be nice to have him, because he certainly has talent, but I'd be a little weary of giving him a big bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree he is still projectionable, and of course you don't have to be in HS to have projection, I was just stating that he is a JuCo guy and not a high school arm. Also, with an injury, where there's smoke, there's fire. So even though his injury is small, I hope he can avoid this type of stuff in the future. I really think Cowan could be a very good prospect, I'm excited that he's now part of the organization.

On to Berry, I think he has better secondary offerings than Berken, but his motion and injury history scare me. If his motion was cleaner and his risk of injury was low, then he'd be a no brainer, but as it stands now I wouldn't give him more than 600K. It'd be nice to have him, because he certainly has talent, but I'd be a little weary of giving him a big bonus.

If he has better secondaries then I would lean more toward him, but I also do not know if his fastball is as good as Berken's. I didnt know that Berken can dial it up to 95. I was under the impression that Berry didnt throw quite that hard....You may know..??

And yes I hear you about where ther's smoke theres fire, I just hope the injury was more fluky than a product of Cowan's delivery having trouble spots in it. This pick like many others in this draft reminds me a lot of the Bundy pick of 08...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berry's fastball is in the upper 80's to low 90's, but it has been described as "sneaky." Despite Berken's velocity, his fastball seems too straight, so I'd call it a wash. And I agree, this draft will have a lot of intriguing guys to follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berry's fastball is in the upper 80's to low 90's, but it has been described as "sneaky." Despite Berken's velocity, his fastball seems too straight, so I'd call it a wash. And I agree, this draft will have a lot of intriguing guys to follow.

I believe I remember Berry being said to have very very good pitchability. And he is able to compete even without his best stuff. Berken I agree has a straight fastball. I never really liked Berken much, I dont mind his shot though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe I remember Berry being said to have very very good pitchability. And he is able to compete even without his best stuff. Berken I agree has a straight fastball. I never really liked Berken much, I dont mind his shot though....

IIRC, Stotle has seen Berry pitch pre-injury and post injury, so maybe he could elaborate on what he saw. I'm sure he gave his thoughts in the draft day threads.

I guess for me it comes down to is if Berry is reasonable with his price. If he's asking for 800K+, then I'd be more inclined to try to buy Kyle Hoppy and Garrett Bush out of college. However, I think I'd be willing to give Berry late 2nd or third round money. It's certainly a risk, but at that price he could be a bargain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Etzel's playable in CF by all accounts. Just a meteoric rise, As we've seen with Beavers, sustaining a hot start in Bowie can sometimes be a challenge.
    • So last night, 7/3, Julio Rodriguez didn't make the catch on that 2-run double by O'Hearn.  It was a long run, but that looked like it should have been caught.  Then Hayes made a nice diving catch in LF and Santander made that sliding grab in RF.  I was wondering about the catch probability of those plays and where you guys get those stats/ details.  I'm thinking the Rodriquez play was less likely caught than the other two, but Santander might have been close.  I'm trying to get a handle on this stat, because of what was discussed in the last thread (...that I couldn't locate) and the understanding that how spectacular a catch might look might not be a good indicator of probability. My untrained eyes say Rodriguez was most unlikely, followed by Santander, and then Hayes.  I'm probably completely wrong.
    • I thought of it but decided the FCL thread was more relevant. But your more than welcome to.
    • Remember Komi Uehera?  Great splitter. The problem was you have to throw the fastball to set it up. He had an average fastball. The Red Sox did ride him to a WS though. 
    • July 1: Chayce McDermott, 7 IP, 12 K’s July 4: Yeiber Cartaya, 4 IP, 10 K’s.   It’s possible I’ve missed one or two so far.    
    • He is such an interesting case. Obviously the extraordinarily late “breakout” age, but you also just almost never see a true one-pitch pitcher in today’s game. Aside from the splitter, he has no ML-quality pitches. The 4-seam fastball is mediocre at best in velocity for a reliever (94.6 MPH), it’s on the straighter side, and it gets tagged to the tune of a .405 wOBA (with a .400 xWOBA to match). It’s a bottom-tier 4-seamer.  And then he throws a cutter 27% of the time. A cutter which is so bad that I can only imagine Palmer would have a coronary watching him continue to throw it. It is arguably the worst pitch in baseball this season, and over the course of his two ML seasons, hitters are posting a .486 wOBA against it. What’s most shocking is that StatCast suggests he’s been lucky to get that outcome, with a staggering .511 xWOBA on two seasons worth of cutters.    Ah, but then you have that splitter. The gift from God. And it really is, to be honest. This is a dude who would be working some every day job like the rest of us if he didn’t somehow master that splitter. But he did, and now he’s making bank playing a game. So far this season, 81 PAs ending on a splitter. Opponents have 4 hits against it (.056 BA). All those hits have been singles. 53 of those PAs ended with the hitter slinking back to the dugout (a cool 65.1% K rate), and it carries a 58.1% whiff rate. The average EV against the splitter this year is 76.7 MPH. The two-year wOBA on the splitter is .133, with a .137 xWOBA to match. Those are goofy numbers. Those are the numbers my 5-year-old nephew will put up against my best wiffleball arsenal this afternoon.    In sum, really interesting guy. Only having one effective pitch concerns me — on the days when the splitter is not splitting, he’s useless. The splitter has gotten more effective this year, not less, so that does assuage some of my concerns about the league eventually getting the book on him and spitting on the splitter in order to wait for a chance to pulverize the other junk he tosses. But is he a guy you can run out 4-5 times against the same elite hitters in a short span in October? It just seems like they’d have to get a solid feel for him after seeing a few times back to back. But if all it would cost is someone like Billy Cook, there’s really no harm done in finding out. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...