Jump to content

8/18 - O's at Rays - Game 1


The Rick

Recommended Posts

Yea i woulda told them that. Except it would have been a "yea sure, whenever my 1B prospect starts clobering the ball in AAA".

How so many people are satisfied with trading a vet on pace for 100+ RBIs blows my mind. Especially when we get a single A pitcher for him. Tigers got the best end of the deal, and don't try to act like that salary dump makes up for it. Because we have dumped plenty of salaries this year.

Did you read through the "100 RBIs" thread in the O's Talk forum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 274
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Okay. Now you're kidding, right. MacPhail turned a below average defensive 1B who is declining at the plate and turned him into a top 10 prospect from one of baseballs better minor league systems, and you don't think that was a good thing? :rolleyes:

No, I do think it's a good thing--where did you get that from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea i woulda told them that. Except it would have been a "yea sure, whenever my 1B prospect starts clobering the ball in AAA".

How so many people are satisfied with trading a vet on pace for 100+ RBIs blows my mind. Especially when we get a single A pitcher for him. Tigers got the best end of the deal, and don't try to act like that salary dump makes up for it. Because we have dumped plenty of salaries this year.

The fact that he was on pace for 100 RBIs doesn't mean a whole lot-- that has more to do with his cushy position in the cleanup spot batting behind the three best hitters on the team. I could bat cleanup behind those guys and get 50 RBIs.

But anyway, there's plenty of Huff discussion going on in the Orioles Talk forum-- let's keep this about the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I do think it's a good thing--where did you get that from?

Now I'm the one that is asleep at the wheel. I meant to quote LA2's comment not yours. I'm going to sit the computer across the room and just watch the game from here on out. I can't trust myself with a mouse or keyboard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I'm the one that is asleep at the wheel. I meant to quote LA2's comment not yours. I'm going to sit the computer across the room and just watch the game from here on out. I can't trust myself with a mouse or keyboard!

Haha, no problem--enjoy the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear God this Yuengling is delicious. :new_beer:

BTW, I feel bad that an exciting Rays team like this can't fill their stadium against non-NY/BOS opponents in the year after the go to the World Series.

BTW Squared - Whoever made this beer emoticon thingy must have been a Guinness fan for making the liquid black and not a yellow/clearish color. Oh well, I love me some Guinness, but i'm over it. I just always thought that was sort of funny since there aren't many dark beers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok on a 2-2 pitch, Wieters sets up right down the middle to Carlos Pena? He just missed one there, wow.

You really can't judge that from the TV camera angles. Just being off a little from center can have a big impact on your viewpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...