Jump to content

Bucs president asked about Harper


Recommended Posts

SnakeWesker: If the Nationals pass on Bryce Harper in the Draft this June, will the Pirates take him?

Coonelly: SnakeWesker, that is a question that we have received often and, I am sure, we will continue to hear as we approach the June Draft. It is far too early to opine as to whether we will select Bryce Harper if he is still on the board when we select with the second pick. If Neal and Greg Smith believe that Harper is the best player on the board, then we will select him regardless of his representative. As a point of reference, no player, including Harper, is the type of certain No. 1 selection as Stephen Strasburg was last year. In fact, there is probably no player in the 2010 Draft who is as highly regarded as Dustin Ackley was when he was selected second by the Mariners last year.

http://pittsburgh.pirates.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20100407&content_id=9127284&vkey=news_pit&fext=.jsp&c_id=pit

I say there's an excellent chance Harper falls to the O's in this year's MLB draft, provided of course that he's not selected by the Washington Natinals (sic). ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact, there is probably no player in the 2010 Draft who is as highly regarded as Dustin Ackley was when he was selected second by the Mariners last year.

I respectfully disagree. Where's the position value with Ackley? Where's the power? I'd rather have Taillon or Harper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://pittsburgh.pirates.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20100407&content_id=9127284&vkey=news_pit&fext=.jsp&c_id=pit

I say there's an excellent chance Harper falls to the O's in this year's MLB draft, provided of course that he's not selected by the Washington Natinals (sic). ;)

Absolutely Killer Post Rep coming your way!

Now. The question is, was that politics of the game? Was it to let folks know not to get angry if they pass on him? or is it his way of clouding the looking glass?

This is why we really need Joe Jordan and Co. on top of their game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely Killer Post Rep coming your way!

Now. The question is, was that politics of the game? Was it to let folks know not to get angry if they pass on him? or is it his way of clouding the looking glass?

This is why we really need Joe Jordan and Co. on top of their game!

I suspect that he is preparing the masses for a letdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Harper will fall to us. I don't see the Nats putting so much money into the draft two seasons in a row.

I respectfully disagree. Where's the position value with Ackley? Where's the power? I'd rather have Taillon or Harper.

Me too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely Killer Post Rep coming your way!

Now. The question is, was that politics of the game? Was it to let folks know not to get angry if they pass on him? or is it his way of clouding the looking glass?

This is why we really need Joe Jordan and Co. on top of their game!

Thanks! :)

You bring up a good question. I wonder if there could be a little "smoke and mirrors" at play here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not read much into this. Pretty vanilla "too early to tell" statement, mixed with the standard "we will take the top player on our board" without defining how players are being measured.

I imagine Harper's slot will be dictated by 1) how teams view the negotiating process will run, and 2) how much they believe in Harper the "player" (ability to learn, adjust, grow, be taught, etc.) and not just Harper the "talent".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling that if the Nats and Bucs pass on Harper that the Orioles will pass too.

I actually hope Harper is gone before we pick, so I do not have to be disappointed if the O's don't select him as well.

On the other side pick Harper, make him a good but not spectacular offer and if he does not take it, pick again next year at pick #4 in a supposed to be very good draft class in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling that if the Nats and Bucs pass on Harper that the Orioles will pass too.

I actually hope Harper is gone before we pick, so I do not have to be disappointed if the O's don't select him as well.

On the other side pick Harper, make him a good but not spectacular offer and if he does not take it, pick again next year at pick #4 in a supposed to be very good draft class in 2011.

Unfortunately, the Nats and Pirates may be thinking along these same lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, the Nats and Pirates may be thinking along these same lines.

That is fine with me because that would mean we would get another great player and with so many good pitchers available I trust Jordan to pick the right one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I so wrong in thinking that the strategy of an idiot? Admittedly one year's draft class is often better than another. However, how do you know that talent remains as strong all the way through until June 2011?

Well I do not think in any way this is or should be the strategy of Jordan and his team when approaching the draft. I am just saying that the O's in case Harper is available should not shy away in regards to signability because if he asks for more than Strasburg they would still have 2011 to sign a top draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be hesitant to draft Harper without a pretty clear idea of the parameters of the signing bonus demands. This is not a pick we want to lose for a year.

We also have to understand Harper's demands relative to those of the other prospects.

Harper sounds like a premium hitter, but one must also realize the last few top HS hitters, Vitters, Moustakas, Hosmer, are not exactly setting the world on fire. Harper is his own case, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • But look how healthy they are.
    • The fact that Justin Armbruester led all Orioles minor league pitcher with just 119.1 is pathetic! The pitching development guys are babying the SPs. This is emblematic of a philosophy that is destined to fail. Guys need to pitch to get better. Guys need to learn to get hitters out the second or third time through the order. I think this is a combination of a bad philosophy and not drafting SP talent in the early rounds. Broken system.
    • The wall was yet another case, in the case of many’s. Where Elias thought he was smarter than everybody  and decided to make hitting homers to left field almost impossible and so in his “genius”he only drafted left-handed hitters. Hence, we have trouble hitting left handers ( the only good thing that came of this is they got Gunner Henderson Earlier than anybody else was willing to draft him. ) No right handed batter would sign  here ever unless it was an extreme overpay. I have hated that wall from day one and I don’t think it lasts much longer. Once they start doing the major renovations, I guarantee it comes in maybe not the extent of what it was before maybe  but it’s coming in.
    • And that's fine. I'm not trying to pick on you, because there are literally dozens of posts I could have responded to but didn't, but it seems to me a lot of people are asking for contradictory things.
    • Something that was an open question during much of the year was if Burnes' line about not trying for strikeouts was BS. Broadly I think he gave the market evidence in the end game that he is a master craftsman, and of course 30 year old pitchers have to regulate intensity to complete the season. The 2021 season was just weird.     At ages 25-26, he got most of a year off, and then he got babied like basically every pitcher in the world in Year 1 after COVID. In 2022 they pushed him for more, and the per-batter effectiveness eroded, setting up that notable 2023 Arbitration hearing that helped make him a 2024 Oriole. A GM wanting his services....don't nitpick.    There will be bidders. Unless Rubenstein is planning for three or more mega contracts at the end of the decade, I think there are places it makes more sense to go.
    • It only takes 2 arms if you'd have him in the rotation over Suarez. Personally, I'd have Suarez in the rotation over him going in to next year as things stand now.
    • I feel like they did it because our pitching sucked. Now it doesn't suck, so let's split the difference. I think it would be a mistake to go into 2025 with the current park dimensions. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...