Jump to content

Don't trade RLo.


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Oh, come on, man... chill... whether Rodrigo is worth a roster spot is highly influenced by who else has the roster spots... I was saying that Rodrigo deserves one much moreso than Ortiz and Chen do, that they "deserve" to go way before he does... people are shootin' from all sides about this, everybody's got a different anti-Rodrigo argument, and I can't keep everybody straight... if I confused your argument with somebody else's, I didn't mean to...

I think the idea on most people's minds is to get rid of the lot of them. Rodrigo, Chen, and Ortiz. The difference is that we might actually be able to get something in return for Rodrigo, which is more than can be said for the other two. But none of the three should be here come August.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it's like keeping Rodrigo instead of Ortiz... or Chen... it has nothing to do with Loewen...

If Ortiz keeps pitching bad, he will be gone too.

Penn replaces him(assumption is Loewen is ready before Penn because of Penn's injury)

By Aug 1, if Benson is not dealt(which he should be), the rotation should be Bedard, DC, Penn, Loewen and Benson.....Ortiz, Rlo and Chen should be gone by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it's not. Getting rid of RLo and Ortiz allows both Penn and Loewen to finish the year in the rotation, which is what needs to happen.

So, I'm supposed to think that it's better to keep Chen than Rodrigo? No thanks.

I've said all along that it's fine with me to trade Rodriog *IFF* we get something of Actual Value for him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know Shack can't answer that question.

I can't do it without the benefit of input from people who have a better-informed opinion about him than I have. What do you think is reasonable to expect of him, both this year and next?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I trust you to give a fair opinion about guys who I don't know much about. What do you think is fair to expect of him, both this year and next?

At age 22, in AAA, he had a 823 OPS and 24 homers.

He is not going to walk alot...My guess is he will be a 770-800 OPS guy who plays adequate defense...The hope is he hits lefties well and we can platoon him with a good lefty bat. The guy is only 24(25 soon enough), so he has room to grow and get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the idea on most people's minds is to get rid of the lot of them. Rodrigo, Chen, and Ortiz. The difference is that we might actually be able to get something in return for Rodrigo, which is more than can be said for the other two. But none of the three should be here come August.

Exactly. This just isn't that complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lopez for Diaz makes a ton of sense. Diaz is still pretty young and has the potential to be a league average LF or DH, something the Orioles desperately need. He isn't in the Mets plans, and they might as well trade him and see if a change of scenery helps Lopez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I trust you to give a fair opinion about guys who I don't know much about. What do you think is fair to expect of him, both this year and next?

But again, considering what we've come to expect as an average performance from RLo, and considering what he's going to cost next year, I still maintain that the performance from a bag of balls might be fair compensation.

Maybe you'd agree with that if the arrangement were that we got rid of Ortiz and Chen and only then traded RLo for the bag of balls?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it turns out this team needs Rodrigo Lopez. With all the young pitching coming RLo has been a consistent source of trade speculation. However this is not the time to trade him.

Why?

Because the young arms will wear down in August and September leaving the O's short on starters or worst.

The one thing the O's don't want to do is put too much stress of young arms. Remember calling up Matt Riley late in the year. Remember the arm problems he developed after that. Were they directly related? Who knows, but why take the chance.

RLo is not a free agent until after the 2007 season. He can pitch the rest of this year and still be traded this winter. RLo will be needed in the rotation until Penn gets stronger. That could take several weeks to a month. By then Bedard and Loewen will have probably excessed their highest innings pitched in their career.

I say keep RLo. Let him spot start for a while and keep sharp in the pen. Then go to a six man rotation late in the year.

This may have been already said, I haven't read the whole thread, but here's what I think:

I'm not for a 6 man rotation. Bedard is the only guy who might need to rest late in the year, although I think he should be able to handle 200 innings by now.

And if we need some guys to spot start, Chen can start, Birkins can start, or we can bring up Bowles, Burres, or even Stephens or Finch. Or maybe Ortiz will get better. Regardless, we have guys who can start if need be.

Bottomline, there's no way I'm keeping Rlo because we may need a 6th starter later on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...