Jump to content

It might actually be worth it to finish with the 1st draft pick...


Recommended Posts

It's being said by guys like Law, etc. that Rendon is the best college bat since Tex.

That's awesome. The Orioles can get what they wanted in Tex next year. He'll probably want to sign with the Yankees when he's a free agent because he idolized Mattingly. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.riceowls.com/sports/m-basebl/mtt/rendon_anthony00.html

The plate discipline is mind boggling. 55 BB 18 K's.

The contact rate is excellent .380

The power is consistent 21 HR last year, 21 HR this year.

The glove is good.

Maybe we can get Manny Machado this year, and Rendon next year, and actually have a solid infield nucleus!

Machado would be a couple years behind Rendon, he needs some development, but the ceiling is there. With Rendon, he's pretty far advanced even as a college guy, ahead of P. Alvarez even, and if you've seen Pedro in person, he's a monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Machado would be a couple years behind Rendon, he needs some development, but the ceiling is there. With Rendon, he's pretty far advanced even as a college guy, ahead of P. Alvarez even, and if you've seen Pedro in person, he's a monster.

Well, we're one-fourth of the way there so let's just do it. :D

Honestly, I think this would be the easiest way to get an impact bat, I don't think we should try to be the worst team in MLB but it's starting to seem like we're destined to be this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No No No No!

If we land the #1 pick, that meas our young talent has tanked. Anthony Rendon does not redeem those failures.

I'd prefer to call it growing pains. Tampa and their young talent continued to bounce along the bottom until they made the drastic jump to a contender. I believe they had the #1 pick in the draft (Tim Beckham) the same year they went to the World Series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd prefer to call it growing pains. Tampa and their young talent continued to bounce along the bottom until they made the drastic jump to a contender. I believe they had the #1 pick in the draft (Tim Beckham) the same year they went to the World Series.

Yes they did. I think some fans of this team are overreacting to this bad year. It sucks, don't get me wrong, but these young guys can still be a solid core, especially if you add in a guy like Rendon, and he pans out.

As long as our young core starts to show some signs of life, I'll be happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that it's a deep draft next year, and there are lot of talented guys in the top 10. But I've seen Rendon a lot this year, and he really will be an impact, game-changer. Tonight he went 2-4 with another walk, and another HR. His last at-bat, they clearly pitched around him and had no interest in coming anywhere near the plate. I think he would need very little seasoning in the minors...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that it's a deep draft next year, and there are lot of talented guys in the top 10. But I've seen Rendon a lot this year, and he really will be an impact, game-changer. Tonight he went 2-4 with another walk, and another HR. His last at-bat, they clearly pitched around him and had no interest in coming anywhere near the plate. I think he would need very little seasoning in the minors...

I'm afraid your going to be dissapointed. We won't finish with the worst record. I do share your sentiment, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm afraid your going to be dissapointed. We won't finish with the worst record. I do share your sentiment, however.
This team is bad. Just not #1 overall bad.

I think there's some hope haha. :P

The team's been pretty unlucky so far, what if (Just throwing out some fairly likely scenarios, not my wishful thinking):

-Roberts and Uehara get hurt again, and Roberts is out for the rest of the year.

-We trade Millwood, Wigginton, Tejada, and Guthrie (and Uehara if he's healthy) at the deadline for a bunch of prospects that either are ML-ready or will be within a year. (Hopefully we can get a SS and 1B at least)

-Certain aspects of the core improve: Markakis, Jones, Wieters, and even Reimold but none produce at an elite level.

-We still have no solution at 1B.

-Matusz shows promise, along with Tillman, Arrieta, and Bergesen in starting roles, but they are inconsistent. The lack of offense leads to mounting losses.

-Hernandez shows promise as a possible future closer but hits some bumps while transitioning to a relief role.

I think if this scenario occurred we could be sitting pretty with the Number 1 overall pick next year, yet we could still have some hope for our core and the future of this team, we would just need to add some veterans to this team.

I don't think we're THAT bad of a team, but I think bad luck, injuries, young players trying to do too much, and trading veterans could form a perfect storm where we would get the number one pick, while still having a promising team going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we're THAT bad of a team, but I think bad luck, injuries, young players trying to do too much, and trading veterans could form a perfect storm where we would get the number one pick, while still having a promising team going forward.

Agree. Trade all veterans with value. Stockpile more young talent. Let the parent club stink for bit. Add the #1 draft choice. Still have a promising team going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's some hope haha. :P

..............

I don't think we're THAT bad of a team, but I think bad luck, injuries, young players trying to do too much, and trading veterans could form a perfect storm where we would get the number one pick, while still having a promising team going forward.

It's possible we could end up with the worst record under the scenerio you outlined. However, even under those circumstances, it is not far fetched that the core group would win some September games to mess it all up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's some hope haha. :P

The team's been pretty unlucky so far, what if (Just throwing out some fairly likely scenarios, not my wishful thinking):

-Roberts and Uehara get hurt again, and Roberts is out for the rest of the year.

-We trade Millwood, Wigginton, Tejada, and Guthrie (and Uehara if he's healthy) at the deadline for a bunch of prospects that either are ML-ready or will be within a year. (Hopefully we can get a SS and 1B at least)

-Certain aspects of the core improve: Markakis, Jones, Wieters, and even Reimold but none produce at an elite level.

-We still have no solution at 1B.

-Matusz shows promise, along with Tillman, Arrieta, and Bergesen in starting roles, but they are inconsistent. The lack of offense leads to mounting losses.

-Hernandez shows promise as a possible future closer but hits some bumps while transitioning to a relief role.

I think if this scenario occurred we could be sitting pretty with the Number 1 overall pick next year, yet we could still have some hope for our core and the future of this team, we would just need to add some veterans to this team.

I don't think we're THAT bad of a team, but I think bad luck, injuries, young players trying to do too much, and trading veterans could form a perfect storm where we would get the number one pick, while still having a promising team going forward.

Sounds like a winner to me, although I am not opposed to Guthrie or Millwood being around next season. I have gotten a little caught up in the Renton hype, dude sounds like the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Any chance Holliday gets the start today? I would assume no…but he did have a good last game and came in for Gunnar and drew another walk.  Urias is 7-29 since coming back and one of those hits was a gift double yesterday.  To be clear, I’m not saying they should start Holliday, just wondering if they would consider it.
    • They are a better match up on paper than Ragans, but I don't think that's really the issue here. This offense has a puckered sphincter problem. They tense up at the slightest of pressure. The matchups probably don't matter at this point until someone will give them a lead and take off some of the pressure. Anytime this team gets behind they pucker up because the pressure is on. If they can get a lead early, it will take some of that pressure off and maybe, they can win the game. If they get behind though they are done.
    • He was very good.  Really hope to see him get a chance again this year.
    • He didn't carry us?  He pitched 8 innings of 1-run ball.  And newsflash - if he'd pitched 8 shutout innings, we very possibly would have still lost.  Was he supposed to also hit a home run to tie the game?  Talking about the starter not carrying us when he pitched 8 and we lost 1-0 is a wild take.
    • It’s 100% fair to wonder if players can calm themselves down and get their heart beat down.    I think Westburg can do this.
    • The key decision is (a) Mounty at 1B and O’Hearn at DH, or (b) O’Hearn at 1B and Kjerstad at DH. Weighing all of the considerations, I would go with (b). If the decision were just Mounty or O’Hearn at first base with the other on the bench, I think the clear choice would be O’Hearn.  Mounty is perhaps 15 runs better on defense over a full season than O’Hearn, though gap may have narrowed some with O’Hearn getting more reps over the last month.  To offset that, his wOBA needs to be ~30 points higher.  Since 2023, O’Hearn’s wOBA vs. RHP has been .47 better than Mounty and his xwOBA has been .41 better.     For Kjerstad, it becomes the same question - do you think his bat today will be in the neighborhood of .30 wOBA points than Mounty.  It’s a tougher question to answer given Kjerstad’s lighter track record.  However, when you factor in Lugo’s platoon splits, the Wall, and Mounty’s prospects against a pitcher with a 9-pitch arsenal, I’m inclined to go with O’Hearn/Kjerstad.   Further, I would prioritize getting momentum on offense - it’s really important to score early and there is a high likelihood that there isn’t a defensive play that Mounty would make and O’Hearn wouldn’t (I know there was one yesterday).  Additionally, Mounty off the bench provides more pinch-hitting flexibility.
    • The Os only have 32 at bats vs Lugo but they have been successful. No one than 6 PA vs him. Slater is the one with 6 at bats and he has 3 hits vs him. Mountcastle, Mullins and Westburg each have 2 hits vs him. Cowser and Westburg have a homer and Westy and Santander each have a triple.  Cowser has the only walk. The Os scored 4 runs, had 9 hits, 1 BB and only struck out once when they faced him in April. So again, like the one Ragans start, they had a lot of hits and a good approach…but can they carry that over?   Lugo had one bad start in September, vs Detroit. The rest of the month, he pitched 23 innings and gave up 3 runs. He shut down the Giants, Yankees and Cleveland. His last outing was 2 innings vs Atlanta and they didn’t store off of him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...