Jump to content

Heyman: Orioles being aggressive


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 303
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's hard to believe this as an Orioles fan without hearing names of who they are targeting with the history that we have had, but whoever that reported this obviously got his facts from somewhere so lets be hopeful that they actually are targeting their players early this year and going after them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what it means, but it obviously means we are doing something. So, that is good to hear, and should assuage the posters in the Lee/Werth thread who seem to think that the Orioles aren't doing anything.

I don't think they are going after Lee or Werth but they could be calling the agents of Victor Martinez, Adam Dunn, and Adam LaRoche already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they are going after Lee or Werth but they could be calling the agents of Victor Martinez, Adam Dunn, and Adam LaRoche already.

I agree that Lee and Werth aren't "on the radar." But so long as they are picking their targets and being proactive rather than reactive, that's what I'm looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see a ton of people on here wanting Dunn. I don't understand why there isn't more of a movement to get Konerko. This guy puts up great #'s every year, plays a solid 1b and will DH if you need him to. No brainer to me.

...plus Konerko is right-handed :cool:...Go O's!!!

Roberts - 2B

Nishioka - SS

Markakis - RF

Konerko - 1B/DH

Scott - DH/1B

Jones - CF

Wieters - C

Pie/Reimold - LF

??????????? - 3B

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good to hear. It also reinforces my expectations. AM won't do anything foolish. If he is out bid on everyone we end up with no one but I expect he will competitively pursue.

Edit: This is the last year of his contract and he will want to go out a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...