Jump to content

Papelbon


FellsPointOsFan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
This thread reaks of jealousy.

Amen.

If Papelbon were on our team, he'd probably be a fan favorite. I know he'd be one of my favorite players.

I know I have always loved the more "colorful" Orioles in the past like Frank Robinson, Earl Weaver, Rick Dempsey etc.

Of course, the constant losing would probably wash that emotion out of Papelbon pretty quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good call on the face ledzepp. Its like his I'm acting tough act. I severely detest Dustin P since the Dcab incident, while Dcab was way out of line I still don't like him. And that Jacoby kid is getting up there as well. While Papplebon may take the cake but its real close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like Papelbon. Don't get me wrong, I hope he blows his shoulder out and is terribly ineffective for years to come. He just seems to be enjoying himself. He's respectful in interviews and doesn't take himself at all seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does it reek of jealousy to point out how a dude jumps around and screams like an asshole after every pitch?

Well, there are plenty of other closers who do so, and I bet if we had Papelbon on our team, most people would be praising his "fire" and "drive" and "passion" and "heart."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good call on the face ledzepp. Its like his I'm acting tough act. I severely detest Dustin P since the Dcab incident, while Dcab was way out of line I still don't like him. And that Jacoby kid is getting up there as well. While Papplebon may take the cake but its real close.

Ellsbury? Really? Pedroia's going to wind up talking himself into a real bad place and Papelbon. . .yeah, I don't even need to go there, but Ellsbury seems like the very definition of innocuous. What's the problem with him? Just that he's an overhyped prospect on a team you hate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone remember Willis Roberts? I definitely didn't like his act, even when he was pitching decently.

He was actually the first thing I thought of when I started reading this thread. He was the classic case of not being able to back up his antics with actual talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone remember Willis Roberts? I definitely didn't like his act, even when he was pitching decently.

Anyone remember Jim Palmer? I think he had the all-time best act. Not show-boating, but very strong. He's throw a 2-out 2-strike pitch to a batter, and let his follow-thru morph into him heading towards the dugout without even waiting to see what the batter did with the pitch.

Not always. Not everyday. But sometimes he just knew "this is a strike, and he can't touch it". I never saw him be wrong about it. Calm, subtle, and perfectly justified arrogance. If you saw it happen, you'd think, "Best act ever".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there are plenty of other closers who do so, and I bet if we had Papelbon on our team, most people would be praising his "fire" and "drive" and "passion" and "heart."

It's not the fact that he does scream and jump around; I appreciate the "fire, drive and passion". It's the fact that he practically does it after every pitch, every strike, and every out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Agreed, but it just seems a little more pronounced with Jorge.
    • That can be said about most hitters in the major leagues. 
    • If you execute your slider, you are in good shape against Mateo. If you hang your slider, RIP.
    • Yes - see Tony’s top 75 prospect ratings for last offseason. Miguel was ranked 35th. Strong defensive catcher with plus contact skills. Power was absent last year but emerged yesterday. I’d expect he’ll be top 15 by end of year. 
    • Baseball will change, there's almost no doubt about that. But it's very unlikely to change back to the ways of 50 or 100 years ago because there's no competitive advantage to do so. It will probably change in ways that we don't fully expect, and that haven't happened before. Unless the powers-that-be change the rules and conditions, which they've always been very reluctant to do, the strategies of today are the strategies of today because they win a lot more games than the strategies of 1970. I think it's more likely that we see individual pitchers pitch even less in each outing (although possibly more frequently) than it is we go back to complete games. Even if the rules are changed, say you can only have nine pitchers on the roster like was common 50 years ago, today's GMs and managers would just use each pitcher for three innings every three games instead of a four-man rotation with lots of complete games.
    • I try to not get too caught up in Mateo but I have to be honest. Watching him in person is just a treat. Love that he is playing so well and continue to be happy he is still an Oriole. 
    • Isn't is just weird that it took 100+ years to figure that out? Hey, that guy hits a bunch of balls right through the box, maybe we should have the second baseman move over that direction a little? Nah, if we do it so will everybody, and we like .350 hitters even when they're on the other team. It would be like a football game where there's a formation where a WR keeps getting completely open downfield and busting 40 yard plays, and it takes 35 years for defenses to adjust. "It's just how it is! If we cover that guy, then the running back might average five yards a carry!"
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...