Jump to content

Nolan Reimold and the Infield Single


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

Yes, but Reimold isn't giving you a 3-5 WAR LF either. You have to pay to play. Jones will cost you about 5M. and give you the 3 WAR or 2.7 x his cost in production. Reimold wil give you 1.7 WAR at about .5 K or 17 x his cost in production. So yeah, we should be trading Reimold for all that SP we need, not Jones. Teams will be knocking the warehouse door down for him.

Nice. This is the type of analysis that I think makes the most sense. Trying to get the most productivity out of your investment instead of breaking even or losing money. These are terms that are a little more measureable to most people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nice. This is the type of analysis that I think makes the most sense. Trying to get the most productivity out of your investment instead of breaking even or losing money. These are terms that are a little more measureable to most people.
Actually I am off with Jones WAR. I'd bet his UZR improves a lot in LF making him a 3.5-4 WAR player at the same cost.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remove the blinders....Reimold has both the foot speed to beat out infield hits and can hit for power. If you extrapolate Reimold's current stats out to give him 600 or so AB's, you'll see about 28 HR's and 90+ RBI's. As for the BA, play him a a regular and IMO he'll be a .270+ hitter. I'll take that in a full time left fielder.

Of course the other side to that argument is that he's 27, is probably peaking now, and has never actually put up a 600 AB, 28 HR or 90 RBI season at any level, majors or minors. And his career professional batting average isn't .270, including several minor league stops where he was old for his level and/or was repeating the league.

I like Reimold in a lot of ways, but penciling in a guy for a level of production he barely reached in the minors and never has approached in the majors, at the age of 28, seems like a reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the other side to that argument is that he's 27, is probably peaking now, and has never actually put up a 600 AB, 28 HR or 90 RBI season at any level, majors or minors. And his career professional batting average isn't .270, including several minor league stops where he was old for his level and/or was repeating the league.

I like Reimold in a lot of ways, but penciling in a guy for a level of production he barely reached in the minors and never has approached in the majors, at the age of 28, seems like a reach.

I think if you gave Reimold 600 PA you'd get 25+ HR and 80+ RBI and an OBP approaching .350. He's got a lot of good attributes as a hitter: power, patience and speed out of the batter's box. He has always been slump-prone, even as a minor leaguer, and that's what you have to watch out for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he is better then the other in house options but I would not disregard him being traded or someone else being brought in over him.

Yeah, he could be traded but if he's still here he'll have a reg job. At least to start the year. I don't think he's going to get slack like an established veteran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 6 months later...

This afternoon, Nolan Reimold started the winning rally in the 10th inning today with his 14th infield single of the season. Of his 52 hits overall this season, 32 of them have been singles ... hence, almost half of his singles have been of the infield variety. He also gives it his best effort when he is on base to get the extra bag if at all possible. One thing that Reimold cannot be accused of is not hustling on the base-paths. :thumbsup1:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?id=reimono01&year=2011&t=b

Nolan ........ We sure missed your infield singles this year.

If I had a nickel for every time that OH fans blew their tops (myself included) in the game threads for all of the double plays that we hit into this year, I'd have quite a few dollars.

Here's to hoping that you are back and healthy in 2013, and may we see you blazing out of the batter's box on every single ground ball that you hit without fail. I'm hard-pressed to think of any right-handed batters that went/go from home plate to first base faster than you do on ground balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Infield hit leaders for the 2012 Orioles:

Jones 30

Hardy 16

Wieters 10

Jones's high total is a testament to his speed and hustle, but it's probably not going to be repeated. His previous high was 21.

If you would have told me at the beginning of the year the Matt Wieters would have 10 infield hits by years end I'd be doing a jig.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I've said before, I would NOT be upselt with a Reimold/McLouth platoon in left going into 2013.

And Socalbirdfan/Frobby, I laugh every time I see a Wieters infield single. Always wonder if the scorer should call it an error just because.

For shame!!! Of course not, the way he runs he should get a special exemption and GET TWO HITS FOR ONE.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Infield hit leaders for the 2012 Orioles:

Jones 30

Hardy 16

Wieters 10

Jones's high total is a testament to his speed and hustle, but it's probably not going to be repeated. His previous high was 21.

How in the world does Matt have ten infield singles? I guess he just played so many games and hit so many ground balls that he got a lot of chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I also went with Burnes because of his better durability. Since 2019 Snell has pitched more then 128 innings in a season one time (180 innings in 2023). While Burnes has pitched over 167 inning or more every season since becoming a full time starter in 2021. Burnes is also two years younger so in theory while a six year contract is riskier it would end at the same age as Snell on a four year deal. I'd be happy with either one, but my preference in Burnes.
    • Adding that I would go for Roki over either of them.
    • I'd go for Snell. He has true Cy Young stuff. Burnes is really good but his K rate keeps dropping and the years scare me. The box score for his playoff start was solid but he actually gave up a lot of hard contact. I just don't trust him enough to commit all those years and dollars.
    • I go Burnes because to me the higher floor is very important with this sort of deal. I feel like Snell's skillset is more on a razor's edge-- if you didn't like how Burnes pitched in August, Snell is almost certainly more prone to stretches of poor performance like that. Even if he is more dominant at other times to balance it out. Plus, the extra length of Burnes' deal is offset a bit by being 2 years younger. 
    • Snell is injury prone and Burnes is a tough workhorse.
    • Didn't see the video? The ball went maybe 15 feet before it bounced, it was rolling by the dugout.  It was nothing and the Dodgers look soft. Was he supposed to let the discarded ball stay on the field?
    • Rojas pulled from the bases in the 3rd inning after he couldn't manage 2nd to home on a Mookie single (and Ohtani couldn't 1st to 3rd behind him) as the Dodgers try to dig out of 6-1.    Rojas' limited mobility hurt the Dodgers defense on a Bogaerts ground ball where Merrill was too quick going first to second, and Rojas ended up getting no outs on a routine ground ball. Manny with a cagey zigzag baserunning move during the Padres 6-run inning off Buehler, getting into Freeman's throwing lane to put Buehler into the jam. Teoscar grand slam brings it back to 6-5 in the 3rd inning...get your popcorn ready.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...