Jump to content

Heyman: Orioles current favorite to land Fielder


BaltimoreTerp

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply
In our offense they could pitch around him. Even if you put Markakis in front of him and Jones behind him (or Wieters or whoever you think the other best bat is), if they truly feared him they would pitch around him.

We are a NL offense, we have a guaranteed out or two every time through the lineup and that won't change if Fielder is on the team.

We are not an NL offense, and yes Fielder would help the lineup. Do you mind telling me who the guaranteed out in the lineup is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone out there besides me who thinks that Heyman does side work for the agents of players?

Oh he absolutely does, though I don't know if you could call it side work. They use him and he prints it and gets page hits. As long as he doesn't cross a line of ridiculousness that would cause sources on the team side not to talk to him, he's golden. It's a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship.

There's also a section in Moneyball IIRC with Beane talking about how he believes some other GMs use some of the reporters to negotiate trades through the press. I think it was Gammons he was talking about in that situation but that was back when he was more active.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good stuff. The bullpen does do a good job of getting groundballs and Bradish, GRod and Burnes are not flyball heavy pitchers although obviously GROd and Bradish have only been out there so much since the start of 2023 and Burnes is just 2024.  Still, they have kept those numbers down.
    • I twisted something and included Cohen.  That's my bad.  And I agree with almost all of this.  My post was more on tying the uber wealth of current ownership to simply having the ability to spend to any level.  The Orioles ownership group is one of the most powerful in all of sports.  I think they will make the Orioles more profitable and I think those profits will be reinvested in a way previous ownership did not. I do not anticipate, but would wildly applaud, ownership funding talent/salary increases out of pocket.  Thanks for the well articulated response.
    • Or another drop-off. Which is more likely at 37?
    • I don’t think we have heard that at all. I believe Elias said that Mateo should be a full go for ST. If what you are saying is accurate, I would agree it’s not worth keeping him around. I just don’t think it’s accurate.
    • Mateo is going to llikely miss the first part of the year and then be limited for much of the year d/t his elbow injury.  I think he won't be able to do much more than DH the early part of the year.  Is he worth signing just for 2025.  Imo, if the O's bring him back, it should be for 2 years.  It could be that Mateo is the backup 1B to Mayo, don't laugh.
    • His statcast page is really good though. He could be a candidate for a bounce back and will likely be a relatively cheap signing. I don’t love the fit but I can see the justification for doing it.
    • Mathematically I'm sure they will get better just because they have been so bad against the pass so far this year I can't imagine it getting much worse. I'm not so sure they will take a step forward against the team that has scored the most points in the whole NFL next Sunday though.   😬 Our best defensive game so far was against Josh Allen and the Bills though so I guess anything is possible.  You would think we would be able to come up with some schemes to confuse a rookie QB.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...