Jump to content

Roch: Duquette confirms no Fielder, Reynolds to 1B?


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Guys, much ado about DD thinking Davis is the clear answer at 3B, yet that is not what he said:

He started by mentioning he knows improvement has to be made in the field:

"He's a good athlete. There's no reason why he shouldn't be able to improve."

And then followed up by stating he had to change his approach at the plate:

"Obviously, he'd have to mature and his approach would have to be consistent for him to do that, but he's got that kind of capability."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frobby, would you also agree that just because Davis is here doesn't mean we should just be satisfied with him and not look to upgrade over him?

Or do you think he should just be handed the job?

No, we can look for an upgrade, but you also have to look at what we have to give up to upgrade and decide if it is worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duquette indicated during his introductory press conference that the Orioles wouldn't pursue the big-ticket items on the free agent market. That means no Prince Fielder, right?

"I kind of poured water on that one, didn't I?" he said.

:vader::vader::vader::vader::vader::vader::vader:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, we can look for an upgrade, but you also have to look at what we have to give up to upgrade and decide if it is worth it.

Ian Stewart is available according to MLBTR. If he gets non tendered I expect that O's to make a run at him. I don't think they trade two minor leaguers for the right to pay him 3M+. But if they can get him cheap, I believe DD would go after him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see that JTrea's Orioles Anonymous site has been shut down. I guess he's really done.

Orioles Anonymous is alive and well and on a brand new host.

I'm not going anywhere as far as being a Site Admin...

As for Duquette, he's never come out and said he will not pursue Fielder. He's said that premium FAs are not his first choice, but he did not rule them out. Nor did he in this entry of Roch's. He never said anything like that. Couple that with StrawDawg's post about the meeting with Boras for Fielder and I think he's just keeping things on the down low.

He said he would not talk about the Orioles FA strategy and he still hasn't really.

Roch is just making an assumption IMO.

Reynolds could very well be traded as he doesn't really have a position were the Orioles to acquire a 1B man, and he can be a FA after 2012 if the Orioles don't pick up his option. And the 1B solutions look worse after this year and the organization has no good internal options for the position.

A LT solution at 1B is needed, and Duquette would be doing himself and the Orioles a disservice not to go after Fielder. Which is why I think he will, but just wants to keep everybody thinking he won't.

Remember also the Yankees ruled out Teixeira when they got Nick Swisher...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good stuff. The bullpen does do a good job of getting groundballs and Bradish, GRod and Burnes are not flyball heavy pitchers although obviously GROd and Bradish have only been out there so much since the start of 2023 and Burnes is just 2024.  Still, they have kept those numbers down.
    • I twisted something and included Cohen.  That's my bad.  And I agree with almost all of this.  My post was more on tying the uber wealth of current ownership to simply having the ability to spend to any level.  The Orioles ownership group is one of the most powerful in all of sports.  I think they will make the Orioles more profitable and I think those profits will be reinvested in a way previous ownership did not. I do not anticipate, but would wildly applaud, ownership funding talent/salary increases out of pocket.  Thanks for the well articulated response.
    • Or another drop-off. Which is more likely at 37?
    • I don’t think we have heard that at all. I believe Elias said that Mateo should be a full go for ST. If what you are saying is accurate, I would agree it’s not worth keeping him around. I just don’t think it’s accurate.
    • Mateo is going to llikely miss the first part of the year and then be limited for much of the year d/t his elbow injury.  I think he won't be able to do much more than DH the early part of the year.  Is he worth signing just for 2025.  Imo, if the O's bring him back, it should be for 2 years.  It could be that Mateo is the backup 1B to Mayo, don't laugh.
    • His statcast page is really good though. He could be a candidate for a bounce back and will likely be a relatively cheap signing. I don’t love the fit but I can see the justification for doing it.
    • Mathematically I'm sure they will get better just because they have been so bad against the pass so far this year I can't imagine it getting much worse. I'm not so sure they will take a step forward against the team that has scored the most points in the whole NFL next Sunday though.   😬 Our best defensive game so far was against Josh Allen and the Bills though so I guess anything is possible.  You would think we would be able to come up with some schemes to confuse a rookie QB.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...