Jump to content

One source is telling me it doesnt look like the Orioles will do anything now


Greg

Recommended Posts

I agree, but good luck convincing people of that. I have seen some unrealistic expectations flying around. Don't get me wrong, I would love for some moves to be made, but this situation is a difficult one.

If we wanted a Greinke or a Lee, we could of had them. But we'd be waving bye bye to Machado or Bundy. And this place would go up in flames if that happened.

The key guys to the trading deadline is to have more pieces like Bundy and Machado (disclaimer: I know all players aren't going to be of those two caliber, but you need players as close to their caliber to make deals happen). Then the O's will be right there in the big trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply
First time in 15 years not to be loser and they do nothing.

Probably because they are smart enough to see that adding Headley, and Blanton doesn't push us to the playoffs, just separates us from talented players/prospects. I'm glad we didn't make any dumb moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C- chips got Liriano and Victorino.

Yeah...don't care about Victorino but the Liriano deal is the only thing that kind of bothers me about this deadline. I would've been fine giving the same for him, + a little more, frankly.

But overall pretty happy we didn't do anything stupid. People who got their hopes up over this deadline--and actually wanted us to go all in--were pretty silly, it has to be said.

Probably because they are smart enough to see that adding Headley, and Blanton doesn't push us to the playoffs, just separates us from talented players/prospects. I'm glad we didn't make any dumb moves.

Yeah, this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Putting the cards on the table, I didn't want to lose Jake and Davis for Headley, and I could take or leave Blanton. I'm not real upset by any of that. I AM upset that DD couldn't find any Gaby Sanchez like deals out there though.

Does Gaby Sanchez push this team to the next level?

If not, then why give up some of our prospects?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C- chips got Liriano and Victorino.

Have you personally went out and scouted the players that were involved in this trade? If so, please enlighten us on your discoveries. They're C- talent because they don't play in an organization that you're familiar with. Good talk though. I love when people dismiss everyone's talent just because they know nothing about it, but what they read off the interwebs.:rolleyestf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I do.. I saw Guts and Liriano were had for practially nothing. Lots of action. You didn' thave to pull the trigger on the big trade, but you did need to get some more depth at the very least. The only thing I opposed was Blanton who I think brings little.

Guts was not going to end up back in Baltimore. Colorado was not going to do it. And people did not want Blanton, but they wanted Liriano? Liriano would have been a risk, and one that easily could have blown up in our faces. I would not have touched him and his 1.44 WHIP and 1.74 WHIP away from Minnesota. Glad he went to Chicago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...don't care about Victorino but the Liriano deal is the only thing that kind of bothers me about this deadline. I would've been fine giving the same for him, + a little more, frankly.

But overall pretty happy we didn't do anything stupid. People who got their hopes up over this deadline--and actually wanted us to go all in--were pretty silly, it has to be said.

You know I agree w/ being okay standing still. That said, if people want to throw blame around, the fact is that there were deals out there that would have likely been an improvement that didn't cost much. I think Liriano and Victorino both qualify. Neither cost anything significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rangers get Dempster for two Single A pitchers(not sure what their ceiling is)...Pirates make 3 or 4 moves...we get nothing because we are too poor to pay 3 million dollars.

I'm glad DD didn't give up any of the top 3 or 4 prospects we have......but Geezus Krist it sucks we didn't do anything at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you personally went out and scouted the players that were involved in this trade? If so, please enlighten us on your discoveries. They're C- talent because they don't play in an organization that you're familiar with. Good talk though. I love when people dismiss everyone's talent just because they know nothing about it, but what they read off the interwebs.:rolleyestf:

C- is actually a pretty generous way to describe the guys Liriano netted.

further reading:

http://www.startribune.com/sports/twins/blogs/164227596.html

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1277337-minnesota-twins-grading-the-francisco-liriano-trade

You know I agree w/ being okay standing still. That said, if people want to throw blame around, the fact is that there were deals out there that would have likely been an improvement that didn't cost much. I think Liriano and Victorino both qualify. Neither cost anything significant.

Yeah, I obviously agree on Liriano. Victorino, though, I totally understand not acquiring. That money is best saved, Victorino is a very minor upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know I agree w/ being okay standing still. That said, if people want to throw blame around, the fact is that there were deals out there that would have likely been an improvement that didn't cost much. I think Liriano and Victorino both qualify. Neither cost anything significant.

Again, you have NO idea what either GM was telling Duquette what they needed.

Just because the prospects that they got aren't highly known does not mean that the Twins or Phillies didn't like them.

We don't exactly have a slew of B prospects available. It's Schoop, Delmonico, the young arms, or nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Angelos did fight the relocation.  He voted against, lobbied against it, withheld permission to adjust TV territories, and threatened to sue if not fairly compensated.  As long as the team was compensated for the loss of broadcast exclusivity, I don’t think he had any other case. From all reports, he drove a hard bargain and it took like 9 months to negotiate a compensation and settlement agreement. There was a wide discrepancy among various parties about what constituted just compensation with Angelos taking more pessimistic views of the impact of the Nats franchise and less optimistic view on MASN. Also, MASN was in perpetuity not temporary.  In hindsight, MASN probably didn’t provide the revenue protection intended because of how the dispute played out and how the RSN market collapsed, but that’s in hindsight. Overall, Angelos “won” the MASN dispute (at least the RSDC process) more than he lost it - the Nationals advocated for rights fees intentionally designed to bankrupt MASN but the RSDC didn’t use their comps. Overall, I think it’s fair to say that relocating a team to DC has hurt the Baltimore club’s market size and ability to fund a top-10 payroll.   HOWEVER, had the Nats not come to DC, the specter of an Orioles relocation to DC would have been hanging over our heads especially as Peter’s health declined, the stadium aged, and the lease approached. Peter would never have moved, but are we sure JA would turn down a higher offer of say $2.3BN offer from Ted Leonsis or someone with the intent to move the club to DC? I think as an Orioles fan it’s probably best to have another team in DC than have to worry about the Orioles ever relocating there.
    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...