Jump to content

Per Rosenthal: Balfour (FINALLY) to Orioles...


xian4

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
tumblr_m1x6h92MdJ1rt4ne1o1_500.gif

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a> are not the team that has offered Balfour a 3rd-year vesting option, according to a source. Balfour has 2-year offer from 3 teams.</p>— Eduardo A. Encina (@EddieInTheYard) <a href="

">December 12, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a> are not the team that has offered Balfour a 3rd-year vesting option, according to a source. Balfour has 2-year offer from 3 teams.</p>— Eduardo A. Encina (@EddieInTheYard) <a href="
">December 12, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

1269602956_dr-mccoy-and-captain-kirk-approve.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When there's competition, you have to move fast. We were front runners and now there are 3 teams involved, one of which has a better offer than us. We moved to slow IMO.
It is also possible his agent was smart enough not to take the first offer and wanted to wait for other suitors. We won't know how we did until we see where he signs. Of course, if it's elsewhere, the talking point has already been written about how we didn't want to go for a three-year deal with a 36 year old closer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's nothing we can do about it if another team is willing to risk three years. I am fine if DD wants to let another team take that risk. The time to get upset was when we let Boston get Mujica for 2 years/$10 million and Anaheim getting Joe Smith at 3/$16. We could have beaten either of those and still gotten a bargain compared to what Balfour is asking. Now we are stuck fighting over a 36 year old who wants $7+ million a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's nothing we can do about it if another team is willing to risk three years. I am fine if DD wants to let another team take that risk. The time to get upset was when we let Boston get Mujica for 2 years/$10 million and Anaheim getting Joe Smith at 3/$16. We could have beaten either of those and still gotten a bargain compared to what Balfour is asking. Now we are stuck fighting over a 36 year old who wants $7+ million a year.

^^^This^^^

Dead on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All right, so Balfour can stick three years up his a**. Let him be somebody else's problem in 2016. What's up with Jesse Crain? Haven't heard any rumors on this guy. Should be cheaper than Balfour. I wanted Mujica or Joe Smith, but Crain would make sense as another guy with closer stuff who just hasn't had the opportunity yet, capable of similar numbers as JJ but half the cost. If Mujica gets 2/$10, give Crain 2/$9. If DD can make it happen, I can be a happy customer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>All week, officials from clubs told me the asking price on relievers was higher than expected. Boone Logan's price tag confirms it.</p>— Jon Morosi (@jonmorosi) <a href="

">December 13, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Rockies are close to signing reliever Boone Logan to a 3-year deal worth more than $14 million, source confirms. <a href="https://twitter.com/FOXSportsLive">@FOXSportsLive</a></p>— Jon Morosi (@jonmorosi) <a href="

">December 13, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Yup cant blame Balfour at all for taking his time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Angelos did fight the relocation.  He voted against, lobbied against it, withheld permission to adjust TV territories, and threatened to sue if not fairly compensated.  As long as the team was compensated for the loss of broadcast exclusivity, I don’t think he had any other case. From all reports, he drove a hard bargain and it took like 9 months to negotiate a compensation and settlement agreement. There was a wide discrepancy among various parties about what constituted just compensation with Angelos taking more pessimistic views of the impact of the Nats franchise and less optimistic view on MASN. Also, MASN was in perpetuity not temporary.  In hindsight, MASN probably didn’t provide the revenue protection intended because of how the dispute played out and how the RSN market collapsed, but that’s in hindsight. Overall, Angelos “won” the MASN dispute (at least the RSDC process) more than he lost it - the Nationals advocated for rights fees intentionally designed to bankrupt MASN but the RSDC didn’t use their comps. Overall, I think it’s fair to say that relocating a team to DC has hurt the Baltimore club’s market size and ability to fund a top-10 payroll.   HOWEVER, had the Nats not come to DC, the specter of an Orioles relocation to DC would have been hanging over our heads especially as Peter’s health declined, the stadium aged, and the lease approached. Peter would never have moved, but are we sure JA would turn down a higher offer of say $2.3BN offer from Ted Leonsis or someone with the intent to move the club to DC? I think as an Orioles fan it’s probably best to have another team in DC than have to worry about the Orioles ever relocating there.
    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...