Jump to content

Per Rosenthal: Balfour (FINALLY) to Orioles...


xian4

Recommended Posts

It is not a straight-up choice between the two. Remember the money and the draft choice... and the money. Did I mention the money?

I'm aware of both of those things. My statement stands. I would rather have Choo at $18-20 million than Ethier at $12-15 million, despite the pick. Choo is the better player, fills our gaping leadoff void, and doesn't necessarily have to be platooned.

Neither player will be an Oriole next year though so it doesn't really matter what either of us would do or want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Will the LH half of the platoon have a career .411 OBP vs. RHPs and the RH half have a career OBP of .340 vs. LHPs? Because it's hard to imagine a platoon matching that. Not saying I would do $100+ million for him. Just saying, that's all.

You can have your .340 OBP every day of the week if it's more than half of the player's OPS. Hard pass.

It isn't worth it to pay that player $20 million a season now, let alone his age 38 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm aware of both of those things. My statement stands. I would rather have Choo at $18-20 million than Ethier at $12-15 million, despite the pick. Choo is the better player, fills our gaping leadoff void, and doesn't necessarily have to be platooned.

Neither player will be an Oriole next year though so it doesn't really matter what either of us would do or want.

What if the Dodgers paid 7-8 per year of Either's salary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you're giving up several quality prospects to acquire a platoon player that will still cost $8-10 million dollars a year.

Either will be better then anything we throw out in 2014 in LF. Remember we will have 2 black holes in 2014, 2nd and DH. Don't need 3 black holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's kind of what I'm getting as well.

I was going to agree with Veve too but I didn't have the balls. :P It all depends on the offers too tho. The offer with the option might be for less money. I do think players see Balmer as a desirable option. Webb just gushed about signing on. Last year Feldman and Norris both said they were happy to hear it was us they were traded too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23orioles&src=hash">#orioles</a> still waiting to find out whether A.J. Burnett wants to pitch in 2014. If so, they want to talk to him. Met with rep at meetings</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">December 13, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Nothing new on Balfour. Market flush with closers and <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23orioles&src=hash">#orioles</a> still looking around while he decides. Axford most likely alternative</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">December 13, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Here comes the spin job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23orioles&src=hash">#orioles</a> still waiting to find out whether A.J. Burnett wants to pitch in 2014. If so, they want to talk to him. Met with rep at meetings</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="
">December 13, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Just sit around and keep waiting. While the Orioles are trying to talk guys out of retiring, other teams are making moves that actually improve the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Nothing new on Balfour. Market flush with closers and <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23orioles&src=hash">#orioles</a> still looking around while he decides. Axford most likely alternative</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="
">December 13, 2013</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Here comes the spin job.

Spin like this?

Boston general manager Ben Cherington stressed a "disciplined" approach in rebuilding the franchise, according to the Boston Globe, which likely means forthcoming free agents Josh Hamilton and Zack Greinke probably aren't in the cards and trades for younger, up-and-coming players are more likely. They'll also re-emphasize building from within, and this trade added a pair of pitching prospects, right-handers Rubby De la Rosa and Allen Webster.

It's a proverbial one step back in order to take two steps forward.

Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/joe_lemire/08/26/five-cuts-dodgers-red-sox-trade/index.html#ixzz2nOxwHOsK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the interview DD did with MLB.com he said that they were looking to trade for a LH hitter. If that's the case, what are the options?

<iframe src='http://wapc.mlb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=31265365&topic_id=40172882&width=400&height=224&property=mlb' width='400' height='224' frameborder='0'>Your browser does not support iframes.</iframe>

1:50 for that btw.

At 2:25... OOOOO Balfour fields too! :drool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This is it right here. The ideal scenario. 
    • Definitely don't want Soto back.  I'm on the fence w/ Dominguez. I guess he's a fine hedge in the event that Felix isn't effective from the jump.  I don't want Rogers on this roster. As said before, I want an open competition for the 5th spot between Suarez, Povich, McDermott, Rogers. If Suarez doesn't make the rotation, he goes into the bullpen. Povich/McDermott/Rogers all have options. If I had it my way, here's what the 13 pitcher breakdown would be: SP1: Free Agent Signing (Snell, Burnes, Fried, etc.) SP2: Eflin SP3: Grayson SP4: Kremer SP5: Free Agent Signing and/or competition w/ Suarez, McDermott, Rogers, Povich Closer: Felix High Leverage: Coulombe High Leverage: Free Agent Signing Middle Reliever: Free Agent Signing *or* Dominguez Middle Reliever: Cano Middle Reliever: Webb Middle Reliever: Akin Middle/Long Reliever: Suarez I'd like to see this club sign a SP1, SP5, a high leverage arm and a reliable middle reliever type..
    • Have you not noticed, Frobby is not among us and I don't blame him one bit. Has been absent since last Wednesday evening.  By the way, I long lost track of any point and particularly relevance this discussion has to Burnes and 400 million.  Seems we are revisiting a lot of he should have - they could of - why can't we now. Great tangent though! Again, for the record, I believe no one is going to give Burnes anything close to 400 million. So my answer to the OP is again - No One!!!!
    • This posts wreaks of someone who has no idea what the cost of relievers are nowadays. Which is, of course, no surprise that you aren’t informed. Now that said, I don’t have an issue if you take someone out..I asked that very question. Who do you take out or what do you not acquire in favor of keeping Suarez?
    • You always have room for another high leverage guy.  And Akin has an option left according to FG.
    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...