Jump to content

Kevin Gausman Today, 2014.


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

It's frustrating that he gets behind so many hitters. The difference between him and Jimenez is that his stuff is good enough that he can pitch out of trouble.

This article has probably been posted somewhere I'm sure but it's a good reminder of the difference he can make if he works ahead.

"For me, that means I want to see an improvement in Gausman?s command before I expect his strikeouts and ERA to dramatically improve. And I believe that could easily happen. Gausman walked fewer than two and a half batters per nine at all three levels he pitched in 2013, and he was lauded for his command as a prospect. This season is more the anomaly than last, and I will be ready to jump back on the Gausman train next season if he starts to once again get ahead of hitters."

http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/the-problem-with-kevin-gausman/

Yep, command of his fastball and improvement of his slider are what is keeping him from being a TOR guy.

I like his chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 459
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yep, command of his fastball and improvement of his slider are what is keeping him from being a TOR guy.

I like his chances.

So, do I. The slider needs improvement but he could also be smarter in how he uses it. Earlier in the season we played Boston and and he started Napoli off with one which was basically a get-me-over pitch. He threw it for a strike as Napoli watched it go by. I contend as a first pitch he needs to throw it more often because guys are looking for the FB and won't offer at a pitch even if it's an average one.

Getting ahead is key though. Whatever pitch he's throwing it must be for a strike. He has to learn to trust his stuff, as Palmer says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gausman was interviewed by WBAL Radio in the pregame show yesterday and had some interesting thoughts.

#1 - He said having Ubaldo and Wieters on the bench to talk to has been immensely helpful, as veterans they have both bent over backwards to help him.

#2 - of course, he went on to say the pitching coach and bullpen coach has also been helpful.

#3 - The key to his successful is having "fastball command".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

KEVIN GAUSMAN O (vs. CUBS, 8/22)

IP:. 5

H:o 6 (2 Home Runs, 2 Doubles, 2 Singles)

R:O 3

BB: 0

SO: 7

Pitches: 101 (62 Strikes, 39 Balls)

2014 ERA: 3.81

PITCHES BY INNING

*****************

91 (61 Strikes, 31 Balls)

15 (91 Strikes, 61 Balls)

23 (14 Strikes, 91 Balls)

30 (19 Strikes, 11 Balls)

24 (14 Strikes, 10 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. 5 IP against an anemic offense... constantly falling behind young hitters. Throwing his slider when it is awful... just a bad outing.

So what do we do here? Never throw a slider or just occasionally throw one off the plate to try and convince hitters he actually has one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...