Jump to content

The Orioles, 10 games at a time


Frobby

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, vab said:

 

41 games under .500 at the end of the season is unbelievable. I don't think there's a word for 41 games under .500 before the all star break.

That word is "Orioles"

I think I might start using Orioles as an adjective.  Like if I had a bad day, someone asks "Hey, how's it going?"  I'll just be like "Orioles, man."

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

4-6

2-8

2-8

4-6

4-6

3-7

1-9

3-7

2-8

3-7

That is an incredible run of ineptitude.   You'd think that just once, for a week and a half a team could muster .500 baseball.   

To be fair they did win 5 of 6 from May 9 to May 13 (doubleheader with Ray's included) which allowed them to go 6-4 for 10 games. It was a glorious time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, O-Arm36 said:

To be fair they did win 5 of 6 from May 9 to May 13 (doubleheader with Ray's included) which allowed them to go 6-4 for 10 games. It was a glorious time. 

Yes, I do remember the Glory Days.   They also went 4-4 on their last homestand, which for them is a wildly hot streak.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
9 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

While the current 10 game segment isn’t complete, the O’s are currently 5-3, meaning it will be the first reported segment all year where they weren’t under .500.    

 

o

 

Earlier in the thread, I noted that the Orioles have indeed have a sequence of going over .500 for a 10-game span. 

It was not at the precise increments of Games 1 through 10, Games 11 through 20, Games 21 through 30, etc, but they did go 6-4 over a 10 game span (7-5 in a 12-game span) earlier this season.

 

 

 

On 5/24/2018 at 11:27 PM, OFFNY said:

o

 

They did actually manage to go 6-3 over a 9-game span, 6-4 over a 10-game span, and 7-5 over an 12-game span, although not precisely at the 10-game increments that start on Opening Day.

 

W ) vs. ROYALS ) (5-3)

W ) vs. ROYALS ) (11-6)

W ) vs. D-RAYS ) (9-4)

W ) vs. D-RAYS ) (6-3)

L ) vs. D-RAYS ) (10-3)

W ) vs. D-RAYS ) (17-1)

L ) vs. PHILLIES ) (4-1)

L ) vs. RED SOX ) (6-2)

W ) vs. RED SOX ) (7-4)

L ) vs. RED SOXS ) (6-3)

L ) vs. RED SOXS ) (5-0)

W ) vs. WHITE SOX ) (3-2)

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/BAL/2018-schedule-scores.shtml

 

o

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OFFNY said:

o

 

Earlier in the thread, I noted that the Orioles have indeed have a sequence of going over .500 for a 10-game span. 

It was not at the precise increments of Games 1 through 10, Games 11 through 20, Games 21 through 30, etc, but they did go 6-4 over a 10 game span (7-4 in an 11-game span) earlier this season.

 

 

 

 

Yes, I know.   That’s why I used the words “reported segment.”    The place where I delineate the segments is in a sense arbitrary, but on the other hand, it’s not cherry-picked to yield a favorable or unfavorable result.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

Yes, I know. That’s why I used the words “reported segment.” The place where I delineate the segments is in a sense arbitrary, but on the other hand, it’s not cherry-picked to yield a favorable or unfavorable result.    

 

o

 

OK.

When you said "reported segment", I interpreted that as any report in the thread and/or any 10-game segment of the season.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/3/2018 at 11:27 PM, OFFNY said:

o

 

(AUGUST 3rd)

 

4-6

2-8

2-8

4-6

4-6

3-7

1-9

3-7

2-8

3-7

5-5

_____

33-77

 

o

 

On 8/14/2018 at 10:23 PM, Frobby said:

3-7, to go 36-84.    Right at .300.   

1-9 in the last 10 to go 37-93.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Assuming we make the playoffs - and Fangraphs assures me it is still 98.8% certain - do we deserve a champagne-and-goggles celebration this year? Feels like instead they should be making a group apology to the fans for making it close. 
    • I'm surprised that with the pitching injuries and issues that the Orioles had, we didn't see more guys from Bowie get moved up to Norfolk to atleast check them out. Heid and Roth (who did deal with an injury in July that impacted him for a few weeks) could have gone to Norfolk for the last month. Loon, if he wasn't injured, could be in place to be there next season.
    • Correct.  We'd be way better off if half those guys were in the lineup.   But yeah, let's fire Hyde.
    • At this stage, I don't care how we get in - just get in. As been said on here a zillion times, the playoffs are a crap shoot. As bad as it seems right now - WHY NOT?
    • Oh, I forgot Mountcastle.  He had a 2.2 bWAR season going (1.4 oWAR). And he's effectively been replaced with O'Hearn who is a 1.3 bWAR player (which has been dropping) of which he has a -1.4 dWAR and a 1.8 oWAR. So there's a net negative there, too, going from O'Hearn part time to him FT and losing Mounty's bat. Injuries are a part of any given team, but I don't think it's unfair to say this team would be at 88-89 wins with even half of those guys back. 
    • While agree that taking this year's Santander out of the offense would hurt. This is the only year that he has performed at this level. He's OPS is 37 points higher this year, than his avg. His OBP stinks and he goes cold for fairly long periods. He's had a couple of heaters that have padded his OPS. His career OPS+ is 114 and that is buoyed by this years 132. I am not saying he sucks or is even at a replacement level player. But he is a pretty flawed player who is not likely to repeat this year which has been pretty flawed as well. I like Santander and I think he provides valuable leadership. I just don't see him having the value that it will take to keep him. I also don't think he is the type of player that ages well. 
    • You really should have to finish in first place to make the playoffs. If the divisions were large from back in the day then I could understand having 2nd place teams make it. It was such an accomplishment back then. We can all agree 3rd place teams making it is a joke. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...