Jump to content

Carlos Gonzalez - Possible Markakis Replacement?


gmelson26

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure I'm sold on the idea, but where would you stand we didn't sign Markakis and traded low because of an 2014 injury for Carlos Gonzalez?

He is a career .294/.351/.520/.871 and about 20 SBs a year, 20-30 HRs, 29 years old. He is signed for 3 years 15m, 16m, 20m each of those years.

Include de Aza in the deal, and have outfield looking something like..

LF - Gonzalez

CF - Jones

RF - Pearce/Lough

I post this as a near pure hypothetical, as I think we're resigning Markakis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I wonder if something like De Aza and Hunter would do it. It's academic I'm sure, since the O's are going to sign Markakis any day now. I would much rather do this, than pay Markakis 4 yrs/$48 mill.

De Aza and Hunter hahahah come on dude Carlos Gonzalez is a stud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

De Aza and Hunter hahahah come on dude Carlos Gonzalez is a stud.

Coors Inflation - 29 for the 2015 season - $16.4 million, $17.4 million and $20.4 million.

2014 - .238 and played just 70 games

Doesn't take too many seasons like that for your "Stud" to become Crush Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...