Jump to content

Andrew Miller DL'd with Forearm Strain


weams

Recommended Posts

I think they could have resigned Miller and still kept Britton as closer. I would have coined "high leverage reliever" and named Miller that guy. Then in the 7th or 8th inning, he can be used in those high leverage situations where you need a guy with closer type stuff to come in and get out of a jam.

With the money he would be making, I doubt he'd care if he was the closer or not. Despite his arm woes, I still think he was the guy we should have been aggressive in resigning.

Very interesting. I did not think of that as a possibility. I assumed that they would just have to move Britton because of the exorbitant amount that we would be spending on late bullpen over the four years of Miller and Three of Britton. I assumed we would be getting close to 17% of payroll with just those two players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think they could have resigned Miller and still kept Britton as closer. I would have coined "high leverage reliever" and named Miller that guy. Then in the 7th or 8th inning, he can be used in those high leverage situations where you need a guy with closer type stuff to come in and get out of a jam.

With the money he would be making, I doubt he'd care if he was the closer or not. Despite his arm woes, I still think he was the guy we should have been aggressive in resigning.

It's hard to know how much more he would have cost than the 4/36 the Yankees are paying him. He took less than the Astros offered (4/40) to play for the Yankees because he thought it was his best chance to get back to the playoffs and because he lives in Tampa, where they have spring training. Sarasota is only an hour away, but it still seems likely to me that the O's would have needed to pay something more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to know how much more he would have cost than the 4/36 the Yankees are paying him. He took less than the Astros offered (4/40) to play for the Yankees because he thought it was his best chance to get back to the playoffs and because he lives in Tampa, where they have spring training. Sarasota is only an hour away, but it still seems likely to me that the O's would have needed to pay something more.

Obviously New York has many extraordinary endorsement opportunities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they could have resigned Miller and still kept Britton as closer. I would have coined "high leverage reliever" and named Miller that guy. Then in the 7th or 8th inning, he can be used in those high leverage situations where you need a guy with closer type stuff to come in and get out of a jam.

With the money he would be making, I doubt he'd care if he was the closer or not. Despite his arm woes, I still think he was the guy we should have been aggressive in resigning.

Yep :agree:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 years for RP is crazy. Even Mo never got more than 3. If we had dumped Matusz, and Hunter, we would be paying most of the 9M Miller would cost, assuming he wouldn't demand more to not close. But if he struggles, as most RP will do eventually, and you want to move him, who wants a 9M set up guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting. I did not think of that as a possibility. I assumed that they would just have to move Britton because of the exorbitant amount that we would be spending on late bullpen over the four years of Miller and Three of Britton. I assumed we would be getting close to 17% of payroll with just those two players.

What is a better combo?

Tommy Hunter $4.65 Million

Alejandro DeAza $5 million

Matusz $3.2

12.85 Million

Roe $507,500K

Reimold $1 million

Miller $9 million

10.55 million

I would have made up that extra money I didn't want to spend on Miller by getting cheaper options than Hunter, Matusz and DeAza.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is a better combo?

Tommy Hunter $4.65 Million

Alejandro DeAza $5 million

Matusz $3.2

12.85 Million

Roe $507,500K

Reimold $1 million

Miller $9 million

10.55 million

I would have made up that extra money I didn't want to spend on Miller by getting cheaper options than Hunter, Matusz and DeAza.

That's ok but you're still tied up for another 30 mil for 3 years after that while the other players are gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlikely unless some of your more apocalyptic MASN scenarios come to pass. Or Congress acts on a far-reaching bill that allows people to pay 25 cents per cable channel that they want, and no more.

They might be wise to plan ahead for a great reduction in resources. We are past peak cable and the days of of RSNs being guaranteed revenues from forced cable subscriptions will end. The only question is how quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's ok but you're still tied up for another 30 mil for 3 years after that while the other players are gone.

Yep, certainly understand the risk, but if I'm the Orioles, I think this is the year I need to go for it with all the players hitting free agency this offseason. I saw what we and KC did with three dominant relievers and if I have to take on some risk I'm fine with that. Besides, Britton will still be decent priced for a few more years.

Not everyone values those top end relievers and I realize they are volatile, but at the end of the day, I would have been aggressive early on and made him a priority signing. Now perhaps this injury will prove to be season ending TJ eventually and the O's will look smart, but I'm on record as saying I would have gone after Miller hard and let and Markakis walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, certainly understand the risk, but if I'm the Orioles, I think this is the year I need to go for it with all the players hitting free agency this offseason. I saw what we and KC did with three dominant relievers and if I have to take on some risk I'm fine with that. Besides, Britton will still be decent priced for a few more years.

Not everyone values those top end relievers and I realize they are volatile, but at the end of the day, I would have been aggressive early on and made him a priority signing. Now perhaps this injury will prove to be season ending TJ eventually and the O's will look smart, but I'm on record as saying I would have gone after Miller hard and let and Markakis walk.

Yeah, he was pretty awesome, no doubt about that. BP's can be a force now. I certainly wouldn't have objected if they signed him, but I understood why we didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, he was pretty awesome, no doubt about that. BP's can be a force now. I certainly wouldn't have objected if they signed him, but I understood why we didn't.

If he had a track record of that type of dominance and usage I could have been persuaded.

Man he is fun to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he had a track record of that type of dominance and usage I could have been persuaded.

Man he is fun to watch.

Even BP guys with track records can be hit and miss. He was probably o e of the more amazing RP's i've ever seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...