Jump to content

Would you sign Manny for 11/$231 mm?


Frobby

Would you sign Manny for 11/$231 mm?  

141 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you sign Manny for 11/$231 mm?

    • Yes, sign him up today!
    • I'd do it, but only if Manny stays healthy the rest of 2015
    • No, too rich/risky for my blood

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 372
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The bidding for MM starts at 5/100. I hope PGA will do at least 7/175 this off season. PGA needs to be involved.

There is no bidding. For two more years. It's "Do you want 10/300 or not." There is nothing else. No opt out. No nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for clarifying, MuprhDogg, didn't realize it would have to cover the next two seasons too. So yes, 5/180 would be what I was getting at.

My concern with a 10/300 deal is paying for decline, quite frankly. I'd rather give him half the money but $50mil AAV for 3 years where he's still south of 30 rather than having to pay him for several years of his 30s but lower AAV.

If you are offering him 10/300 M today, in 10 years he will be in age 33 season. Hardly his decline. Which is why he wouldn't accept 10/300 M, he will be worth 250 M+ in production over the next 5.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that 10 / 300 is going to get it done assuming Manny continues to improve over the next three years. I think we're going to see Manny get an absolutely insane contract.

Nothing will shock me. I wouldn't count out a 500M deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People talk about paying whatever it takes to sign Manny...

I'm not paying 50M per.

Assuming a win costs 9M during the time period in question, Manny would still have to average over 5 and a half wins a year.

Manny was worth 6.8 wins (according to FanGraphs WAR) putting him at #8 on the MLB list for WAR in 2015.

At age 23.

So there is data to support his value at over $50 million a year.

Precedent, injury risk, and the arbitration system means the Orioles shouldn't need to pay him $50 million a year, thankfully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manny was worth 6.8 wins (according to FanGraphs WAR) putting him at #8 on the MLB list for WAR in 2015.

At age 23.

So there is data to support his value at over $50 million a year.

Precedent, injury risk, and the arbitration system means the Orioles shouldn't need to pay him $50 million a year, thankfully.

Didn't say it couldn't happen.

Banking on 5.5 as your break even point is higher than I would be willing to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't say it couldn't happen.

Banking on 5.5 as your break even point is higher than I would be willing to go.

Yeah, I don't think players are going to get full $/WAR at the top end. The injury risk is too high to spend that much for one player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't say it couldn't happen.

Banking on 5.5 as your break even point is higher than I would be willing to go.

If no one here think Manny would or should sign for 10 years 300 million today, I don't know what to say. Let's just stop talking about him then until he gets traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Awesome research, thanks. I was a fan in 1974 but had forgotten that string of five shutouts.  This last two weeks of rotation excellence (and your list) is giving me flashbacks to the summer of love (1967), when I started to make game logs to savor the strings of shutouts and low-hit gems by Oriole starters. Looking back now at the game logs kept by Baseball-Reference (manually, without your sorting skills!), it's hard to identify exactly which streak so impressed my teenage fan-meter, or even which year. Certainly 1968 was all about low scoring league-wide.  Maybe it was the stretch 22-27 May 1967 featuring Phoebus, Bertaina, Barber, McNally, and Phoebus again (good old 4-man rotation!), including three scoreless outings. Or Hardin and Brabender joining Phoebus, McNally and Palmer from 15 to 20 September, 1967. What about 1969, with Cuellar, Lopez and Leonhard joining the previous cast of McNally, Phoebus, and Hardin, twirling 10 starts (13-22 June) while allowing only 12 runs.  Anyway, it feels rather historic to see this run of high-end pitching from an Orioles rotation. Here's a chart to recap the numbers on this streak in progress... Date Starter IP H ER ERA (14 G) totals: 81.67 59 19 2.09 21-Apr Irvin 6.2 4 0   22-Apr Suarez 5.2 4 0   23-Apr Rodriguez 4.1 11 7   24-Apr Kremer 5.1 3 2   26-Apr Burnes 6 3 1   27-Apr Irvin 7 4 0   28-Apr Suarez 4 7 4   29-Apr Rodriguez 5.2 5 0   30-Apr Kremer 7 4 2   1-May Burnes 6 4 2   2-May Bradish 4.2 4 1   3-May Irvin 6.1 2 0   4-May Means 7 3 0   5-May Kremer 6 1 0  
    • Somehow feels typical of Orioles to play up to the competition, and get burned by the pretenders... same with individual starting pitchers. 
    • It was very obvious ...he would also take a look at his hand frequently. On Saturday, watching a clip in the dugout after one of the HR's, Kremer went to give a high five, pulled back and took a look at his hand. I thought it strange, and I thought something was off. He always appeared to be one of the more enthusiastic celebrators. It would seem the coaches would notice and probably did, but thought nothing of it. Certainly didn't affect his game.
    • Umpire really tried to screw us on Saturday.     
    • I heard someone call it The Great American Smallpark.
    • I just looked thru their record a while ago.  Series against the Nats (2), White Sox, Marlins, Cardinals, Rockies and Angels makes their record of 1 win better than the O's way less impressive.  Their schedule coming up must be hell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...