Jump to content

Offseason Rumors and Deals Around MLB


neveradoubt

Recommended Posts

Helton will suffer like Walker is right now. Larry Walker is a HOF player, but the voters can't see past the Coors Field effect.

40 years ago the Hall put in everyone like Chuck Klein, figuring anybody who once hit .386/40/170 had to be super awesome since none of these goldarned kids with their "nutrition" and "weightlifting" can do that anymore. What's that about Baker Bowl and it being like 305 in the RC gap? Yea, whatever. Now if you hit .372/42/147 in Coors they just round that down to "Jay Gibbons".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
40 years ago the Hall put in everyone like Chuck Klein, figuring anybody who once hit .386/40/170 had to be super awesome since none of these goldarned kids with their "nutrition" and "weightlifting" can do that anymore. What's that about Baker Bowl and it being like 305 in the RC gap? Yea, whatever. Now if you hit .372/42/147 in Coors they just round that down to "Jay Gibbons".

Yeah. The Rockies deserve HOF players like any other franchise, but batters have the stigma and pitchers have the bad stats. Walker is the best player ever to play significant time in Coors Field (time will tell on Tulowitzki) and he is twice the player Chuck Klein was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. The Rockies deserve HOF players like any other franchise, but batters have the stigma and pitchers have the bad stats. Walker is the best player ever to play significant time in Coors Field (time will tell on Tulowitzki) and he is twice the player Chuck Klein was.

Walker was every bit as good as Alan Trammell and Tim Raines so he'll eventually go in. What's that? Oh.

At some point I'll have to accept that Ray Schalk (22 fWAR) is in, and Lou Whitaker (68 fWAR) never will be seriously considered, much less elected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Source confirms: Leake to Cardinals done, pending physical. Expectation is that it'll be 5 years, $75M w/ $18M option for '21.</p>— Chris Cotillo (@ChrisCotillo) <a href="

">December 22, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a lot of scrill for a 5'10" righty w a career SO rate of 6 per 9, and a 100 ERA+ in the NL.

Groundball pitcher with a good defense behind him. Young FA. Mexican League projects and $4M Asian starters aren't walking through that door. We don't have the greatest track record developing starters. Leake type of production could end up being $20M+ during his contract.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Groundball pitcher with a good defense behind him. Young FA. Mexican League projects and $4M Asian starters aren't walking through that door. We don't have the greatest track record developing starters. Leake type of production could end up being $20M+ during his contract.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And when he's k-ing 5 something a game, walking close to 3, and giving up over a hr a game, as he likely would in the AL East, that isn't 20 million a year production.

Leake's a slightly sturdier, slightly better version of Miguel Gonzalez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Source confirms: Leake to Cardinals done, pending physical. Expectation is that it'll be 5 years, $75M w/ $18M option for '21.</p>— Chris Cotillo (@ChrisCotillo) <a href="
">December 22, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Rosenthal says 5/$80M with options that could push the deal to $93M, so maybe $5M is buyout in '21.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...