TonySoprano Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Orioles and Mets have been among those teams involved in talks with lefty reliever Antonio Bastardo. Very strong second half in 2015.</p>— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) <a href=" ">January 5, 2016</a></blockquote><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clapdiddy Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Bastardo would be an interesting guy for the pen. Wonder if we'd be looking to move someone if he's brought on board? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Yet another bullpen guy that can't be optioned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tx Oriole Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Bastardo would be an interesting guy for the pen. Wonder if we'd be looking to move someone if he's brought on board? I wouldn't mind him on the team. I think it be good to have him. IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobby Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Bastardo would be an interesting guy for the pen. Wonder if we'd be looking to move someone if he's brought on board? It would be an absolute necessity to move someone. Frankly, I don't see the O's spending the money it is likely to take to land Bastardo. Tony Sipp recently signed for 3/$18 mm and Bastardo is very comparable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canonfaz Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I don't understand this move unless there is a secondary trade of moving Matusz or Brach afterwards. We need another optionable piece in the pen besides Givens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 It would be an absolute necessity to move someone. Frankly, I don't see the O's spending the money it is likely to take to land Bastardo. Tony Sipp recently signed for 3/$18 mm and Bastardo is very comparable. Not sure why the O's would be throwing up chaff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aglets Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Our pen is currently set up like this, right? O'Day Britton Matusz Brach McFarland Givens Bundy Riefenhauser? Worley? Don't get me wrong, Bastardo is better than some of those guys most likely, but who would go if we add another bullpen arm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Our pen is currently set up like this, right?O'Day Britton Matusz Brach McFarland Givens Bundy Riefenhauser? Worley? Don't get me wrong, Bastardo is better than some of those guys most likely, but who would go if we add another bullpen arm? Obvious answer from a production standpoint is McFarland. Then again that further limits flexibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srock Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Our pen is currently set up like this, right?O'Day Britton Matusz Brach McFarland Givens Bundy Riefenhauser? Worley? Don't get me wrong, Bastardo is better than some of those guys most likely, but who would go if we add another bullpen arm? Matusz is sucking up the most resources. He could be traded. The lack of bullpen options is alarming given how the roster has been managed the last few years. I hope Duquette has some magic up his sleeve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WietersCorner Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Go get him. As MLB has proven over the last several years - an exceptional bullpen wins championships. Britton O'Day Bastardo Givens Brach Matusz (maybe rotation/trade candidate?) Bundy McFarland? Riefenhauser? Worley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aglets Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I wonder what the over / under would be from Vegas for days Dylan Bundy will spend on the 25 man roster this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waroriole Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Yet another bullpen guy that can't be optioned? Maybe we're getting rid of SP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristotelian Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Our pen is currently set up like this, right?O'Day Britton Matusz Brach McFarland Givens Bundy Riefenhauser? Worley? Don't get me wrong, Bastardo is better than some of those guys most likely, but who would go if we add another bullpen arm? I think McFarland is more of a question mark than Worley because TJ can start the year in Norfolk. I hope Worley has a higher chance of starting the year in the bullpen than becoming our replacement for Chen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobby Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 The lack of bullpen options is alarming given how the roster has been managed the last few years. I hope Duquette has some magic up his sleeve. I think this issue is somewhat overrated. If your bullpen guys are marginal, then it's nice to have options so that you can move them up and down. If your bullpen guys are reliable, then as a practical matter you aren't going to option them. Most likely, there will be times when the bullpen has been used heavily and we will need to create an 8th bullpen spot at times to give the others a blow. The players called up to fill that spot need to be optionable, and you need a couple of the marginal position players to be optionable to make room for that 8th bullpen spot when needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.