Jump to content

TT: Something to consider when talking about Hyun Soo Kim


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

I'm not using any projection system. He has horrible plate discipline...strikes out frequently and can't draw a walk to save his life. He's an average defender. He's a fringe bench player at best.

I'm sorry but you implying that Alvarez's upside is as high as Jackson or even Bruce is insulting our intelligence.

What is your bar for striking out frequently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 579
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm not using any projection system. He has horrible plate discipline...strikes out frequently and can't draw a walk to save his life. He's an average defender. He's a fringe bench player at best.

I'm sorry but you implying that Alvarez's upside is as high as Jackson or even Bruce is insulting our intelligence.

There you go again. There is a grain of truth in what you are saying but then you lose all credibility in the hyperbole. MLB league average strikeout rate was 22.6% last year. Alvarez' career minor league strikeout rate is 12.2%. Less than half of MLB average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not using any projection system. He has horrible plate discipline...strikes out frequently and can't draw a walk to save his life. He's an average defender. He's a fringe bench player at best.

I'm sorry but you implying that Alvarez's upside is as high as Jackson or even Bruce is insulting our intelligence.

No... valuing guesswork and emotion over systematic projections is insulting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There you go again. There is a grain of truth in what you are saying but then you lose all credibility in the hyperbole. MLB league average strikeout rate was 22.6% last year. Alvarez' career minor league strikeout rate is 12.2%. Less than half of MLB average.

When you don't care about getting the details right a 12% minor league K rate can be a 30% MLB rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't know what else to tell you to make you finally realize that Alvarez isn't good. Like, the fact that you're THIS adamant about him starting is troublesome.

His ceiling is as high, maybe even lower, than Bruce and Jackson's floors offensively and no one has anything good about his defense other than "he throws hard".

You basically have told us nothing but YOU have given your unwavering undocumented opinion that seems to be second guessed by several.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't know what else to tell you to make you finally realize that Alvarez isn't good. Like, the fact that you're THIS adamant about him starting is troublesome.

His ceiling is as high, maybe even lower, than Bruce and Jackson's floors offensively and no one has anything good about his defense other than "he throws hard".

So what about your statement on his K rate?

Just going to act like you didn't say it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So me misspeaking means he's a good major league player?

When did I say that?

I just found it amusing that you dodged the question when called out on the statement.

I don't think he is much of a player but making contact isn't an issue.

I think you just assumed he had strikeout issues and didn't bother to check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't know what else to tell you to make you finally realize that Alvarez isn't good. Like, the fact that you're THIS adamant about him starting is troublesome.

His ceiling is as high, maybe even lower, than Bruce and Jackson's floors offensively and no one has anything good about his defense other than "he throws hard".

I think you might have a pathological problem with sticking to the facts. I've said about 23 different ways that I think Alvarez could be a kind of acceptable guy if you have to stick him in RF. I said that I thought he could be a 1-ish win player. You have now exaggerated or misrepresented that position any number of ridiculous ways, saying variously that I think he's an All Star, or a very good player, or an awesome starter, or I could go on for a while but you know what you've said.

You've also not come up with any substantive facts that suggest that the Orioles will be a lot better with Jay Bruce or Austin Jackson besides your subjective opinion. None. None whatsoever.

We kind of require evidence around here, at least when you make simple declarative statements that you portray as facts. I guess it would be fine if you prefaced your statements with "just my opinion, I really have no objective evidence to back this up" or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you might have a pathological problem with sticking to the facts. I've said about 23 different ways that I think Alvarez could be a kind of acceptable guy if you have to stick him in RF. I said that I thought he could be a 1-ish win player. You have now exaggerated or misrepresented that position any number of ridiculous ways, saying variously that I think he's an All Star, or a very good player, or an awesome starter, or I could go on for a while but you know what you've said.

You've also not come up with any substantive facts that suggest that the Orioles will be a lot better with Jay Bruce or Austin Jackson besides your subjective opinion. None. None whatsoever.

We kind of require evidence around here, at least when you make simple declarative statements that you portray as facts. I guess it would be fine if you prefaced your statements with "just my opinion, I really have no objective evidence to back this up" or something like that.

I miss sigs.

That would make a good sig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'd have to hit .290-.300 to carry even a respectable OBP/be an average player and his minor league stats don't suggest that's possible.

His AAA numbers in a rather extreme pitcher's park have been .282/.311/.428. Projection systems translate to something like .270/.295/.425, which is a 92-94 wRC+.

Last year Jay Bruce had a .226/.294/.434 (91 wRC+) line with the Reds. The year before .217/.281/.373 (78 wRC+). How is Bruce much more likely to post a respectable OBP than Alvarez? The average MLB OBP in 2015 was .317.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His AAA numbers in a rather extreme pitcher's park have been .282/.311/.428. Projection systems translate to something like .270/.295/.425, which is a 92-94 wRC+.

Last year Jay Bruce had a .226/.294/.434 (91 wRC+) line with the Reds. The year before .217/.281/.373 (78 wRC+). How is Bruce much more likely to post a respectable OBP than Alvarez? The average MLB OBP in 2015 was .317.

Which is one hit by pitch every two weeks different. Just teach him to lean in until he becomes disabled to get his stats up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...