Jump to content

Stan 'The Fan' Charles: Dylan Bundy-Buck Showalter Relationship Is Something Worth Watching


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This is very much what my thread the other day was about.

There's no right or wrong answer.

But I'm one who feels like 120 innings for Bundy over the course of 6 months shouldn't ruin him.

And if it does, the problem is deeper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stan "The Fan" Charles says the Orioles' issues with overusing the bullpen should not fall on Dylan Bundy's "comeback" arm and shoulder.

https://www.pressboxonline.com/2016/04/14/dylan-bundy-buck-showalter-relationship-is-something-worth-watching

Tommy John himself went from pitching zero innings in 1975 to 207 innings in 1976. And pitched 14 years after his surgery. We baby these guys too much. If Bundy didn't want to be on the major league roster contributing he needs to find a new career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tommy John himself went from pitching zero innings in 1975 to 207 innings in 1976. And pitched 14 years after his surgery. We baby these guys too much. If Bundy didn't want to be on the major league roster contributing he needs to find a new career.

Who the heck said that Bundy didnt want to be contributing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For now, two innings is enough for Bundy.

This seems arbitrary.

Throwing 3 innings instead of 2 is more about pitch count and intensity of the first 2 innings then some hard and first innings limit.

I have no problem with how Bundy is being used and hope they slowly increase his pitch counts as the season moves forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems arbitrary.

Throwing 3 innings instead of 2 is more about pitch count and intensity of the first 2 innings then some hard and first innings limit.

I have no problem with how Bundy is being used and hope they slowly increase his pitch counts as the season moves forward.

I think Buck was testing the waters, for a long relief role, which I dont see an issue with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tommy John himself went from pitching zero innings in 1975 to 207 innings in 1976. And pitched 14 years after his surgery. We baby these guys too much. If Bundy didn't want to be on the major league roster contributing he needs to find a new career.

In 1975, Tommy John was an established, physically mature, 32 year-old, major league pitcher.

Dylan Bundy is none of those things and should be used with greater care and consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 1975, Tommy John was an established, physically mature, 32 year-old, major league pitcher.

Dylan Bundy is none of those things and should be used with greater care and consideration.

I am reading "the Arm" by Jeff Passan. Interesting book about Tommy John and pitching.Different ways teams handle pitchers,etc.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/excerpt--in--the-arm---a-search-for-the-new-frontier-of-building-healthy-baseball-pitchers-043238884-mlb.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am reading "the Arm" by Jeff Passan. Interesting book about Tommy John and pitching.Different ways teams handle pitchers,etc.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/excerpt--in--the-arm---a-search-for-the-new-frontier-of-building-healthy-baseball-pitchers-043238884-mlb.html

He was on 105.7 the other day, discussing the book along with current happenings in baseball. I think the take away is that different pitchers and different situations are, well, different. :-) There can be hard innings where every pitch is a grind and max effort. And there can be easy innings where guys make first pitch outs and you have a big lead to work with. You could be an older workhorse coming off of injury, or a kid who only has a few dozen innings over the past three years. Managers have to judge accordingly.

Jim Palmer has told a story about when he was a rookie charting pitches during a game. Robin Roberts (I think) had gotten to 130 pitches (or so) and Palmer went up to Weaver to tell him the pitch count. Weaver told him to shut up and sit down. He'd be able to see when Roberts was getting tired and didn't need a pitch count to tell him that. I think bringing along young pitchers or pitchers coming off of injury is a lot like that. There's no magic number like 100 innings (which Passan thought was a ridiculous standard not based on any scientific research or reasoning). A manager needs to watch to see whether the pitcher is laboring or if it's been easy going.

I think Buck can handle this. Dusty Baker, probably not so good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was on 105.7 the other day, discussing the book along with current happenings in baseball. I think the take away is that different pitchers and different situations are, well, different. :-) There can be hard innings where every pitch is a grind and max effort. And there can be easy innings where guys make first pitch outs and you have a big lead to work with. You could be an older workhorse coming off of injury, or a kid who only has a few dozen innings over the past three years. Managers have to judge accordingly.

Jim Palmer has told a story about when he was a rookie charting pitches during a game. Robin Roberts (I think) had gotten to 130 pitches (or so) and Palmer went up to Weaver to tell him the pitch count. Weaver told him to shut up and sit down. He'd be able to see when Roberts was getting tired and didn't need a pitch count to tell him that. I think bringing along young pitchers or pitchers coming off of injury is a lot like that. There's no magic number like 100 innings (which Passan thought was a ridiculous standard not based on any scientific research or reasoning). A manager needs to watch to see whether the pitcher is laboring or if it's been easy going.

I think Buck can handle this. Dusty Baker, probably not so good.

I think Mike Maddux is a real good pitching coach and might help Dusty out this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 1975, Tommy John was an established, physically mature, 32 year-old, major league pitcher.

Dylan Bundy is none of those things and should be used with greater care and consideration.

Undoubtedly.

But nobody's suggesting he should throw 200 innings.

That's not even on the table.

Hell, nobody's even suggesting 150.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
    • Bingo....I have said this before also. Wives of players are not clamoring to come near B-More. Factor in taxes and its a hard sell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...