Jump to content

Wayne Kirby's Outfield Positioning (A rant thread)


Old#5fan

Recommended Posts

Too bad neither you or I will live to see that. They have this newfangled stat cast thing And iPADs (another gadget) in the dugouts.

Yeah I almost added that comment to my last post that I will never live to see it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If you pitch well the shift doesnt matter. see: the Rays.

IMO that I agree with. You wouldn't have outfielders playing the power allies if in today's game you had Sandy Koufax, Nolan Ryan or Randy Johnson either, but something tells me Wayne Kirby would!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO that I agree with. You wouldn't have outfielders playing the power allies if in today's game you had Sandy Koufax, Nolan Ryan or Randy Johnson either, but something tells me Wayne Kirby would!

Here's a question for you.

Do you think this is Kirby's doing or do you think he is following orders from above?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a question for you.

Do you think this is Kirby's doing or do you think he is following orders from above?

I think Kirby and the outfielders and Buck and the whole organization are working off the best stats they have and are ALL completely on the same page. Blaming Kirby for ANYthing is the lowest common denominator of trying to place blame SOMEWHERE. Anywhere. Heads must roll!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So did Kirby position Trumbo's glove too far off the ground on that ball last night?

You know the decision to place him in RF lies with Buck. After they get there it's Kirby's responsibility to position them. At this point, if someone can't sufficiently play an OF position Wayne Kirby is not going to be a savior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know the decision to place him in RF lies with Buck. After they get there it's Kirby's responsibility to position them. At this point, if someone can't sufficiently play an OF position Wayne Kirby is not going to be a savior.

I think in this case the decision was Dan's. You can't put Pedro in the outfield and you can't put Davis out there after he signs that deal. (Not that I think Davis is much better)

Do you think Buck has the freedom to bench Pedro for a week and go with Kim or Reimold in the OF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in this case the decision was Dan's. You can't put Pedro in the outfield and you can't put Davis out there after he signs that deal. (Not that I think Davis is much better)

Do you think Buck has the freedom to bench Pedro for a week and go with Kim or Reimold in the OF?

Yes, but I hope it's Nolan. Trumbo and Alvarez should be a platoon DH with Trumbo getting more ABs vs mid tier RHP. Or, at least some variation of that. Kim should eventually be released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be alone in this as I am more of an old school baseball fan but I would much rather see Kirby cease his standard positioning of the corner outfielders in the power alley or gaps. Last night was a perfect example of the stupidity of it. He had Richard playing in essentially left center and the hitter doesn't get around on Tillman's fastball which seemed to have decent movement and bloops a very high pop up that even a slow left fielder playing a normal left field position easily catches but I doubt David Lough would have made that catch from where Kirby had Rickard stationed. I would much rather take my chances of getting beat by a ball hammered up the gap than a stupid bloop that should have been an easy out. I mean cmon if I was Tillman I would be po'd as to where Kirby had Rickard playing and to essentially make a great pitch and "allow" a game breaking "double" on account of Kirby thinking I am more likely to allow a ball hammered up the gap in left center. No wonder Palmer used to place his own outfielders. Maybe Tillman ought to copy Jim from here on out!

I agree with you. I don't notice any other team positioning their outfielders in the gaps like we do and it annoys me every time we get burned by a hit down the lines. If it's so clever, why don't other teams do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you. I don't notice any other team positioning their outfielders in the gaps like we do and it annoys me every time we get burned by a hit down the lines. If it's so clever, why don't other teams do it?

The only time it is clever is when you think your pitcher is going to through pitch (most likely a meatball) to a hitter or you think the pitcher is not good enough in facing that particular hitter but you don't want to walk him. Or else you have a hitter like Bryce Harper who is pretty much a threat to hammer any pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So did Kirby position Trumbo's glove too far off the ground on that ball last night?

No need to be a wise guy, as you know my beef with playing corner outfielders almost religiously now up the gaps which penalizes the pitcher when the make a good pitch often times and rewards the hitter when they deserve to be out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they were playing closer to the line I'm sure you would be belly aching because the opposing team was getting to many gap doubles. That being said, the reason they play so far off the line is that the doubles that are being hit down the line would be doubles anyway, so they protect the gap. Move them closer to the lines and they would be giving up doubles in the gaps and down the lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
    • Bingo....I have said this before also. Wives of players are not clamoring to come near B-More. Factor in taxes and its a hard sell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...