Jump to content

The rise and fall of Rafael Palmeiro


xian4

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Hmm, I read it and it was very well written article, but I have a little different take. The problem with guys like Palmeiro is that they just won't take responsibility for their actions. Had he just come out and admitted taking the steroids, I would have had a lot more respect for him. He seems like he's become a very bitter man, and part of that is he hasn't fully taken responsibility for his actions. He still is claiming the "tainted B-12 shot," but what caused his power to surge suddenly a year from Free Agency at the age of 28?

You and I have no idea what he did or didn't do. Performance changes are a poor substitute. You can find careers little different from Raffy's 30, 50, 70, 100 years ago.

He actually had a .267 ISO in 84 games in 1987, at 22, the year they juiced the ball. They almost certainly juiced the ball again around the strike/lockout in '94-'95, but Raffy's ISO went back over .200 in '91 at the age of 26. Three years before free agency.

Maybe he was juicing his whole career. Maybe not. But the idea that he won't take responsibility for his actions only has merit if he's lying. What if he's not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't know that. Pardon my ignorance. They should be in Cooperstown, IMO.

Are you saying all Negro Leaguers should be in the Hall of Fame in Cooperstown? There were thousands, and most of them weren't even good enough to be major league players. The Negro Leagues were like today's Cuban or Japanese Leagues: inner circle HOFers playing with guys of AAA, AA, A ball quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you saying all Negro Leaguers should be in the Hall of Fame in Cooperstown? There were thousands, and most of them weren't even good enough to be major league players. The Negro Leagues were like today's Cuban or Japanese Leagues: inner circle HOFers playing with guys of AAA, AA, A ball quality.

I'm saying we should integrate the respective hall of fames

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh. Maybe there is a case to put Raffy and others in the Hall. I don't really care. I certainly don't buy the "woe is me" routine or feel sorry for him that he is not in the Hall. He took a risk and got caught.

So did a sitting president while in the oval office, and the public didnt lynch him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Palmeiro needs is for Tejada to admit to possessing B12 and stanozolol and then giving him a possibly tainted vial of B12 and boom, a lot of things change for him, especially with the Veteran's Committee and probably coaching opportunities.

This article is great, but it really makes me feel like Palmeiro is still running from the truth.

Isn't Tejada broke (apologies if the article covers this). Every man has his price (especially broke men), if Raffy is still in good financial shape, I wonder how much he'd have to pay off Miggy in order for him to sing like that.

That said, God forbid should word ever get out on THAT one. Raffy's already been flat out raked over the coals before. That was 10+ years ago and it's settled down since then. Can you imagine if he got put on full blast again, this time in the social media age. And as they say, the cover-up is worse than the crime.

Still, you have to wonder if it'd almost be worth him throwing the dice on possibly recovering his legacy completely. He's got but more embarrassment (albeit much more, as covered) to risk. And who knows? Maybe he'd be paying Miggy off to tell the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and I have no idea what he did or didn't do. Performance changes are a poor substitute. You can find careers little different from Raffy's 30, 50, 70, 100 years ago.

He actually had a .267 ISO in 84 games in 1987, at 22, the year they juiced the ball. They almost certainly juiced the ball again around the strike/lockout in '94-'95, but Raffy's ISO went back over .200 in '91 at the age of 26. Three years before free agency.

Maybe he was juicing his whole career. Maybe not. But the idea that he won't take responsibility for his actions only has merit if he's lying. What if he's not?

We know that he injected himself with something and that he tested positive for steroids. Absolute best case scenario, he knowingly injected himself with something received from another player (not a doctor) at a time of rampant steroid abuse. He may have had a "don't ask don't tell" approach to injecting himself but even if you take Palmeiro at his word, it is obvious he did something he knew or should have known was cheating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't Tejada broke (apologies if the article covers this). Every man has his price (especially broke men), if Raffy is still in good financial shape, I wonder how much he'd have to pay off Miggy in order for him to sing like that.

That said, God forbid should word ever get out on THAT one. Raffy's already been flat out raked over the coals before. That was 10+ years ago and it's settled down since then. Can you imagine if he got put on full blast again, this time in the social media age. And as they say, the cover-up is worse than the crime.

Still, you have to wonder if it'd almost be worth him throwing the dice on possibly recovering his legacy completely. He's got but more embarrassment (albeit much more, as covered) to risk. And who knows? Maybe he'd be paying Miggy off to tell the truth.

I guess you didn't read the entire article. Raffy lost $53 million on a bad real estate deal and had to file for bankruptcy. I highly doubt he has enough money to pay Tejada to take the fall for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you didn't read the entire article. Raffy lost $53 million on a bad real estate deal and had to file for bankruptcy. I highly doubt he has enough money to pay Tejada to take the fall for him.

The article said he had to file for bankruptcy, but "avoided financial ruin". I suspect nobody's going hungry at the Palmeiro "estate".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loved the article. I guess my takeaway is reputation is simply more important than money. What does it profit a man to gain all the money he can but lose his reputation?

That question resonated all through the article for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know that he injected himself with something and that he tested positive for steroids. Absolute best case scenario, he knowingly injected himself with something received from another player (not a doctor) at a time of rampant steroid abuse. He may have had a "don't ask don't tell" approach to injecting himself but even if you take Palmeiro at his word, it is obvious he did something he knew or should have known was cheating.

He's no Eagle Scout, sure. But I don't know that it's helpful to assume everyone was cheating full-bore from day one, assuming not just guilt but worst-case guilt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I didn't know that

In 2006 there was a special committee that resulted in the induction of 17 former Negro Leaguers, by far the largest induction class of all time. And, being the Hall, they screwed it up in an almost tragic way. They inducted 17 people, including executives and owners with kind of hazy credentials, but passed on Buck O'Neil, the great storyteller and ambassador of the Negro Leagues. He would have been the only living member of that class. Of course he handled it with dignity and class, but that had to be a huge punch in the gut. He passed just a few years later in his 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2006 there was a special committee that resulted in the induction of 17 former Negro Leaguers, by far the largest induction class of all time. And, being the Hall, they screwed it up in an almost tragic way. They inducted 17 people, including executives and owners with kind of hazy credentials, but passed on Buck O'Neil, the great storyteller and ambassador of the Negro Leagues. He would have been the only living member of that class. Of course he handled it with dignity and class, but that had to be a huge punch in the gut. He passed just a few years later in his 90s.

The people who run the hall are morons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Soto has had 6 years in the majors. Only 2 of them with an ERA under 4 and he's averaged a 100 ERA+. He has a career FIP of nearly 4. A career WHIP of over 1.4. Why is that valuable? Yeah, he can go on dominant runs. But so could Bryan Baker.  That's worth clogging up a spot and not getting somebody more consistent and...well...better?
    • Taking a look at 2023 vs 2024 FANGRAPHS WAR, some interesting directional info.  (Acknowledging that WAR is not definitivve,  FG uses FIPERA for Pitcher WAR).  This is meant to highlight areas of opportunity not a deep dive on data.  Highlighted 5 key areas:   1) TOR/Ace role /Burns FA.  All other roles 2-6 are likely fine.  Bradish coming back in 2nd half of 2025 would be a boost but should not be counted on.   Going into 2025 w/o sourcing a 4 WAR type of replacement for Burns would be a huge miss.    Most important decision/move for 2025.  2) Need to solidify closer and BP which is hopefully Felix coming back strong but should not depend on 2023 dominance.  Need a deep pen with reliable depth in minors and assume more trade deadline reinforcements.   Plenty of good options here, spend $ smartly but don't depend solely on waiver claims.  3) Adley - none of Elias' 2024 calculus included AR's huge 2nd half dropoff.    If he does not come back strong, may have to re-think AR contribution and make up for any defecit in other positions.  If Gunnar is a 10 and Adley's a 4 WAR we are more than fine, should not assume Adley is a 5+WAR player.  4) Santander - How is he best replaced.  Elevate Heston and pair him with a RH platoon partner who can back-up all three OF postions.  Not an easy find but needs to be impactful - a RH bat, preferably a high OBP type- that player does not exist in the org in terms of 2025 readiness.     Supposedly that's why Mayo is so highly valued as a RH  bat which is why not developing him as an OFer is curious.  5) Jackson Holliday - Biggest upside story for 2025.  Expect to see major improvement and the type of bat the lineup needs.  Should be settled in, got to experience the post season without playing but a lot of the Elias' plan/process is JH becoming a very good player.   
    • I don't get the idea of not wanting Soto back. First of all, lets talk about money.  He probably gets around $6M in arb for 2025. 37 relievers made 6M or more in 2024. 56 made 4M or more.  A 1/6 deal for him isnt bad and its not a long term commitment, which is a huge plus. After his 2 awful outings after he got here, Soto appeared in 20 games. He threw 16.1 innings and had a 1.10 ERA. He gave up 1 homer, walked 4, 11 hits and struck out 20.  For the season, his ERA was a mediocre 4.42 but his FIP was 3.68, his K rate was over 11 and his HR rate was .68. The issue is the walks. He is still only 29 years old, has over 60 appearances each of the last 4 years (ie he's durable) and he has very good seasons in the past. Even last year, when his ERA was 4.62, his xERA was 2.79 and his FIP was 3.59. With his ability to get Ks and miss bats and the upside he has, taking the chance on him for 1/6 is a risk you would be foolish not to take.
    • Haha. Our reliever with the lowest FIP & WHIP and highest K/BB rate.
    • Akin is discussed above. Pretty sure he is out of options as of this year. But I am far from a roster nerd.  Cano and Felix do have options but they are not the type of guys you would option assuming they are performing at a high level, only if they struggle. We are not going to want to option them just to get through a bullpen day or manage rest. 
    • It's a tough question. Akin stunk/hurt in 2023, this year he was very good in medium/low leverage situations. Suarez is a starter *and* was effective in relief. I don't know, think I'd rather have Suarez, tbh.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...