Jump to content

For crying out loud, can MLB please implement an electronic strike zone already?


weams

Recommended Posts

Over on the billjamesonline.com forums there's a similar thread, but I seem to have lost that one.  If I can't produce statistically significant truth data with error bars for the pitch tracking systems several other posters told me that they're going to stay with the assumption that Country Joe West is more accurate than the robots.  The statement was made that charts like the ones Corn has been posting are essentially made up numbers, since we don't have exact source data and methodology on how the plots were generated. 

Oh, also, that since the strike zone is defined in relation to individual batters who move around the robots can't judge that and the humans that currently help define the upper and lower limits of the strike zone are probably introducing more error than just using a human ump.

I guess that's really the final word on this.  Eyeballin' it is way better than calibrated optical/laser/radar/lidar systems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

How about just replacing the HP ump altogether?

Anyone else see what went down in the Mets-Marlins game?

This folks, is a game winning HBP that should have been strike 3.

Yes he obviously leaned into the pitch, yes the ump gave the Mets the victory. 

zOk2rYL.png

And don’t allow the players to wear body armor that makes them feel comfortable enough to lean in and get HBP. 

If Conforto thought there was a decent chance he fractures his arm, he doesn’t lean into that pitch. 
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not see the Mets game, but I have been advocating  for electronic calling of Balls/Strikes for years.  It  would take one more item of a baseball game from the realm of   They Get Most of them Right, to Now all calls are Correct, well virtually all.  I suppose the machine could malfunction.    Not having the Home Plate Ump  would open the can of worms for the Union to get involved.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

How about just replacing the HP ump altogether?

Anyone else see what went down in the Mets-Marlins game?

This folks, is a game winning HBP that should have been strike 3.

Yes he obviously leaned into the pitch, yes the ump gave the Mets the victory. 

zOk2rYL.png

It’s actually worse than it looks. Home plate ump Ron Kulpa called the pitch strike three, and then signaled HBP and sent Comforto to first base. This has nothing to do with umpire judgment— by rule, if the pitch is a strike then it can’t also be a HBP. After the game Kulpa admitted to a pool reporter that he misapplied the HBP rule, and that Comforto should have been out on strikes. If the Marlins protest the game by all rights it should be upheld and the game resumed with two outs in the 9th. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

And don’t allow the players to wear body armor that makes them feel comfortable enough to lean in and get HBP. 

If Conforto thought there was a decent chance he fractures his arm, he doesn’t lean into that pitch. 

The problem is with the "armor" in the strike zone. The helmet was a good safety improvement -- and it's out of the strike zone. Same goes for shin pads: they are outside of the strike zone and a very, very good equipment improvement.

But I would be fine with outlawing elbow pads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ShoelesJoe said:

It’s actually worse than it looks. Home plate ump Ron Kulpa called the pitch strike three, and then signaled HBP and sent Comforto to first base. This has nothing to do with umpire judgment— by rule, if the pitch is a strike then it can’t also be a HBP. After the game Kulpa admitted to a pool reporter that he misapplied the HBP rule, and that Comforto should have been out on strikes. If the Marlins protest the game by all rights it should be upheld and the game resumed with two outs in the 9th. 

Seems the HP ump would have overruled the Cyclops (or whatever cute nickname MLB will refer to its robotic strikezone camera) anyhow, so the problem of a human ump misapplying a basic rule would not be prevented nor overturned by a robo-ump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

The problem is with the "armor" in the strike zone. The helmet was a good safety improvement -- and it's out of the strike zone. Same goes for shin pads: they are outside of the strike zone and a very, very good equipment improvement.

But I would be fine with outlawing elbow pads.

I'd rather just allow the body armor, but it's contingent on the umpires calling a strike (or even the batter out) when a hitter leans into the strike zone to take one for the team. Conforto had no fear of letting a 90+ MPH ball hit him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Oriole1940 said:

I did not see the Mets game, but I have been advocating  for electronic calling of Balls/Strikes for years.  It  would take one more item of a baseball game from the realm of   They Get Most of them Right, to Now all calls are Correct, well virtually all.  I suppose the machine could malfunction.    Not having the Home Plate Ump  would open the can of worms for the Union to get involved.  

So you disagree with Drungo's post above about why the robocalls are problematic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Has anyone else noticed that the 'strike-zone box' is the same size for all batters? It's not possible that Judge and Stanton have the same size strike-zone as that midget outfielder that Yankees have.

Also, while I realize that umpires make up their strike-zones, the 'strike-zones boxes' go below most batters' knees and barely above their waists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good, he should cry. His performance the last 3 months including playoffs isnt something that gets forgotten easily. Atleast not for me
    • I wonder if Adley's issues are something health related but not necessarily an injury per se.  IIRC we all found out in the offseason that Ced was suffering from Crohn's in.......2020?  2021? 🤔  After Ced was pretty dreadful offensively all that season (whichever year it was). I mean something like that could potentially be at play with Adley.  Health issue but not an "injury."  Maybe something that was medically revealed after the HBP? IDK, spitballing here.
    • Not trying to be naive or contradictory, but are we sure that he's swinging at bad pitches?  
    • I tend to agree, I'm not convinced. Cowser had hand/nerve stuff and continued to play his game. Westburg broke his hand, came back, and looked good. Not sure why getting hit on the hand suddenly made Adley swing at trash out of the zone. 
    • I hate that Adley getting hit on the hand is the excuse why he kept playing and his season went down the crapper, yet Italian Breakfast gets hit on the hand, breaks his thumb and works his ass off to get back to his team in time for the playoffs.    I’m a 50% believer that Adley getting hit on the hand is the reason that he was so bad towards the end of the season, but it still doesn’t explain the drop in OBP. He’s getting down to Adam Jones levels of on base percentage.  His approach seems to be totally different than when he first came up. A hurt hand doesn’t have anything to do with that. 
    • I watched both the Elias and Hyde press conferences in full and they both get weird around the Adley question. You can feel the hesitation on saying it's not an injury, and the way they kind of squirm around the question. If we can point to the HBP then surely they can do and would have done MRIs if Adley still felt iffy after the x-ray. Unless he's truly hiding it. But it sure feels like all parties know about something and for some reason that makes no sense to me, they aren't divulging it. 
    • They might not even know. Initial x-rays were negative, it's possible that Adley thought he could just play through it and maybe it wasn't painful, just fatigued? Who knows. But unless Adley tells them (assuming they're not hiding it), nothing they can really do. Wonder if Adley just felt the All Star Break was coming up, so he'd just deal.  I think it's way too obvious of a data point to ignore, personally. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...