Jump to content

PED Suspensions Coming


Sessh

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, weams said:

Marte was not using a designer drug. He was using the mass building stuff. As have many of the Dominicans. So as are many of the MLB players I have seen respond to his use, I am a bit angry that he was able to parley his chemical romance into the esteem and money and position that he did.

As you know, I loved Cruz, and he's a PED user. So it's not like I think all players that use stink all together.

I think the guys who use the stuff that masques well or easily probably have better skills than the Jay Gibbons of the world. And you know, for every one of the 800 jobs that the Horse Hormone Users take up, a kid that is close misses out. 

Well, I agree with the sentiment (and pulling on the heartstrings, you bastard) of the last paragraph.  But IMO, you still gotta hit the ball.  

I'm not sure if there's much of a difference between the designer drugs and the mass building stuff.  From what I know the goal of the PEDs is to recover from workouts faster to build more muscle quicker than you naturally could.  Designer drug or mass building, IMO, it's splitting hairs.  These guys aren't taking them for any other reasons, right?

Again, I'm not sure when Marte started using.  Has it been reported?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well, I agree with the sentiment (and pulling on the heartstrings, you bastard) of the last paragraph.  But IMO, you still gotta hit the ball.  

I'm not sure if there's much of a difference between the designer drugs and the mass building stuff.  From what I know the goal of the PEDs is to recover from workouts faster to build more muscle quicker than you naturally could.  Designer drug or mass building, IMO, it's splitting hairs.  These guys aren't taking them for any other reasons, right?

Again, I'm not sure when Marte started using.  Has it been reported?

I assume that someone who will use that stuff has been using since he was 14. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Are you more upset about the fact that you thought Marte was a good dude and now he's a known cheater?  Or are you more upset that your 2nd favorite team is without a really good player for 80 games? 

Of course it's both.  The latter is a team perspective and former is a player perspective.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2017 at 8:38 PM, crawjo said:

What on earth would have prevented them from doing it? 

1) The fact that they were so talented that they probably wouldnt't need them to beat the competition, 2) The immediate and short-term side-effects, 3) The long-term side-effects

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because Ruth and Bonds weren't talented.

Lance Armstrong was a hack.

You're such a troll.  Where did I imply that any of these guys weren't talented?

That said, even if was amazingly talented, how was Lance Armstrong not a hack?  He's the poster child for a career made by doping.

What is the source that Babe Ruth doped?  And even if he did, how effective could they have been back in his day relative to any other kitchen sink concoction any other player used?

Barry Bonds is the guy that really rides the line.  Would he have been at the league of Mantle, Aaron, Mays and Pujols had he not cheated?  I doubt it, but maybe.  ARod is another case.  He's so insecure that even if he had twice the talent of Ruth he still would have maybe doped.

Edited by CheeryO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CheeryO said:

You're such a troll.  Where did I imply that any of these guys weren't talented?

That said, even if was amazingly talented, how was Lance Armstrong not a hack?  He's the poster child for a career made by doping.

What is the source that Babe Ruth doped?  And even if he did, how effective could they have been back in his day relative to any other kitchen sink concoction any other player used?

Barry Bonds is the guy that really rides the line.  Would he have been at the league of Mantle, Aaron, Mays and Pujols had he not cheated?  I doubt it, but maybe.  ARod is another case.  He's so insecure that even if he had twice the talent of Ruth he still would have maybe doped.

What possible difference does it make how effective it would have been?  Either the intent is there to cheat or it isn't.

Ruth tried to cheat.  It didn't work and he fell ill but it doesn't take away from his intent to cheat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CheeryO said:

You're such a troll.  Where did I imply that any of these guys weren't talented?

That said, even if was amazingly talented, how was Lance Armstrong not a hack?  He's the poster child for a career made by doping.

What is the source that Babe Ruth doped?  And even if he did, how effective could they have been back in his day relative to any other kitchen sink concoction any other player used?

Barry Bonds is the guy that really rides the line.  Would he have been at the league of Mantle, Aaron, Mays and Pujols had he not cheated?  I doubt it, but maybe.  ARod is another case.  He's so insecure that even if he had twice the talent of Ruth he still would have maybe doped.

Sorry forgot the other bit.

This is how it works, if you state as a premise that athletes A, B and C were so talented that they didn't need to cheat and I respond with athletes X, Y, and Z were every bit as talented and yet they cheated that is calling into question the validity of your premise.  Since their doesn't seem to be any evidence that athletes that reach a certain performance threshold are less likely to use PEDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...