Jump to content

Cody Sedlock (Merged with: Sedlock sold to Tigers in July 2022)


weams

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

I think one more good start after today and Sedlock goes to Bowie.  He seem to be way ahead of the competition in the Carolina League.

I wouldn't. He skipped Delmarva and didn't pitch much in Aberdeen. There is no real tape or report on him. Let him stay in Frederick for the season. Let him face the same teams 3 or 4 times and see if they figure him out. If he still has the same success all season, then Bowie next year. If he gets knocked around a little, then good. See how he bounces back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sedlock is a 1st rounder from a major college program.   After 4 starts he is 3-0, 1.64 ERA, 0.82 WHIP and a .135 avg against.

I would think the O's are trying to find the level where he is challenged.  He looks too good for Frederick.   Gausman pitched 3 games at Frederick.  JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

 

15 OUTS: 5 Strikeouts, 5 Groundouts, 4 Flyouts, 1 Popouts

 

CODY AUSTIN SEDLOCK o))o (vs. Advanced-A Dalem, 4/23)

IP:llll5

H:;;ll l1 ll(1 Single)

R:lll.) 0

BB:.ll3

SO:lll5

Pitches: 89 )(54 )Strikes, )35 )Balls)

2017 ERA: 1.64 (Advanced-A Frederick)

2017 WHIP: 0.818 (Advanced-A Frederick) )

2017 OPPONENTS BATTING AVERAGE: l.135 )(Advanced-A Frederick) ) 10 for 74

 

PITCHES BY INNING

************************

19 ll(10 .lStrikes, lll9 )lBalls)

10 l.(61 .lStrikes, l.4 )lBalls)

16 ll(11 llStrikes, l..5 )lBalls)

19 ll(11 llStrikes, l)l8 )lBalls)

25 ))(16 llStrikes, ))9 )lBalls)

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

 

I seriously doubt he gets promoted before mid/late May, if then.    It's not like he's striking out a ton of guys.    

He's a sinker ball pitcher.  I wouldn't expect a ton of strikeouts.  

He's not allowing a lot of baserunners (0.82 WHIP).  That is the most important thing.  I agree with the other posters who say he will get promoted sooner rather than later if he keeps this up due to his age and draft status. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, wildcard said:

Sedlock is a 1st rounder from a major college program.   After 4 starts he is 3-0, 1.64 ERA, 0.82 WHIP and a .135 avg against.

I would think the O's are trying to find the level where he is challenged.  He looks too good for Frederick.   Gausman pitched 3 games at Frederick.  JMO.

Matusz pitched 11 games at Frederick.    Arrieta pitched an entire season there.   

Sedlock has pitched well, but I don't consider 6.5 K/9 and 2.0 K/BB to be signs that he's too good for the league.    I'd rather let him settle in for a while.    We can consider a promotion in late May.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Matusz pitched 11 games at Frederick.    Arrieta pitched an entire season there.   

Sedlock has pitched well, but I don't consider 6.5 K/9 and 2.0 K/BB to be signs that he's too good for the league.    I'd rather let him settle in for a while.    We can consider a promotion in late May.   

Both Matusz and Arrieta were per-Dan.   Gausman was 2012 in Frederick.  Dan's first year.   Besides Arrieta was a  3rd rounder.

I am no mind reader.  You could be right.  But looking at Gausman and Sedlock  as both 1st rounder under Dan.   Dan tends to move them faster as long as they are doing well.   Sedlock's number appear to say that he is better than A ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Both Matusz and Arrieta were per-Dan.   Gausman was 2012 in Frederick.  Dan's first year.   Besides Arrieta was a  3rd rounder.

I am no mind reader.  You could be right.  But looking at Gausman and Sedlock  as both 1st rounder under Dan.   Dan tends to move them faster as long as they are doing well.   Sedlock's number appear to say that he is better than A ball.

I think there's a pretty big difference between being the no. 4 overall pick (and 1st pitcher picked) and the no. 27 pick (7th college pitcher picked).    Gausman was ranked the no. 26 prospect going into the 2013 season; Sedlock wasn't in the top 100.    

That said, like you,I'm not a mind reader.     I wouldn't move Sedlock now, but I don't know what Dan will do.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think there's a pretty big difference between being the no. 4 overall pick (and 1st pitcher picked) and the no. 27 pick (7th college pitcher picked).    Gausman was ranked the no. 26 prospect going into the 2013 season; Sedlock wasn't in the top 100.    

That said, like you,I'm not a mind reader.     I wouldn't move Sedlock now, but I don't know what Dan will do.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Agree to disagree.   8 walks and 16 strikeouts in 22 innings is not dominating to me.   Again, that's not to say that he couldn't hold his own or even do well at Bowie.   

 

Is Austin Wynns dominating AA?    Is he too good for AA?

Doesn't really matter.  He is blocked by Sisco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Doesn't really matter.  He is blocked by Sisco.

The point's the same.    Less than three weeks of games doesn't tell you who's too good for a particular level.    It tells you who has had a good or bad start.    

I think we've pretty much exhausted this argument.     We'll see how quickly Sedlock moves.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

I'm actually expecting Akin to get to Bowie a bit before Sedlock - based on Akin's superior SO/W ratios.  But I'd be very surprised if either was promoted before June.  Wait and evaluate.      

June/July around the All Star game is when I'd really start moving people around in terms of promotions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Oh, I thought you were taking about his hitting in high leverage situations. 
    • Frustrating sure, but boring is not what I would I say. We do steal bases at times. I would like for us to play more small ball sometimes and it is frustrating to see us be so homerun happy. I think with Westy back, we will see a resurgence of timely hitting as that is very contagious.   We saw that at the beginning of the year. Amazing sight to see for sure. I think the most disheartening thing that really shocked me is the apathy and outright disgust I’ve seen from O’s fans toward their team. Perhaps we have been spoiled? No idea. Maybe expectations were too high? No idea, but frankly, a lot of yall focusing on other things and simply not watching/posting would make next season a lot more enjoyable. This is the first time since 96-97 where we make the playoffs in back to back years and you guys have been acting like some real lame jerks this whole dang season. Frankly, yall should be ashamed of yourselves. We are an incredibly young team and with that come highs and lows, but yall don’t see that. You just love to complain and moan and bloviate. Where’s the heart? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s the gratitude? You’d think with all this team has overcome, especially being so young, y’all would be happy, but no. So go off on your little bike rides or whatever. Go watch a movie if this saga seems boring to you. I don’t care. Just for once this season, keep your immense negativity to yourself.
    • Really an amazing run, 4 straight years. I completely agree with the ranking, too. There's no way Kjerstad is still a prospect though, right? 45 days is the cutoff and he's played in 48 games.
    • i think we all are going to have ptsd from that 9th inning for a while,it was that brutally bad . they need to do some special to get us to forget about it
    • wow,did gunnar and adley have to do this last season? 
    • I suggested that earlier but I think it's probably a bad play with no out. The O's have like 85% probability of scoring. There is a huge downside risk of Mullins popping up the bunt for a double play. He could also whiff on the bunt making at least Holliday an easy out. With one out and only 65% probability of scoring it's a much better play. I think if Santander and Mullins were reversed in the lineup Hyde may have done it but not when you have two shots to get the run in. 
    • WE GOT US ONE - JD5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...