Jump to content

O's acquire Steve Pearce for Jonah Heim


McLovin

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply
His peripherals last year weren't that much different from his 2014 season. The big difference was that he had a .322 BABIP in 2014 while only having a .232 BABIP last year. That's not suddenly turning into a bad player. That's having terrible luck.

I hate it when people reflexively say BABIP = luck. Better players have higher BABIP because they hit the ball harder. There are some elements of luck, but it's not entirely luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate it when people reflexively say BABIP = luck. Better players have higher BABIP because they hit the ball harder. There are some elements of luck, but it's not entirely luck.

But BABIP seems to be a very reliable tool when comparing a players BABIP from the current year to how he did the prior year or for his career. If a player's BABIP is 100 points higher than last year, chances are he's been lucky this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as Pearce struggled last year, he still put up a .711 OPS which isn't horrible. It seemed to be a combination of injuries, a couple prolonged ruts, and some bad luck. He could just never get going.

He's not as good as he was in 2014 but not as bad he was last year. I think he's a solid .750-.800 OPS bat as an everyday player and better than that if you just play him against lefties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But BABIP seems to be a very reliable tool when comparing a players BABIP from the current year to how he did the prior year or for his career. If a player's BABIP is 100 points higher than last year, chances are he's been lucky this year.

Somewhat, particularly if he has a track record. I personally think Pearce just had a down year AND had bad luck, and the year before, he had a great year and had good luck. As others have said, he's probably a mid case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So big sruprise, Pearce is injured

I know Heim isn't supposed to be much but I just don't see the point in picking up a guy that misses as many games as he plays.

Now we hear he has had a bum arm all year which reduces his value as an occasional starter in the OF

Would have rather promoted Dariel Alvarez, kept Heim in the system and saved a couple million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So big sruprise, Pearce is injured

I know Heim isn't supposed to be much but I just don't see the point in picking up a guy that misses as many games as he plays.

Now we hear he has had a bum arm all year which reduces his value as an occasional starter in the OF

Would have rather promoted Dariel Alvarez, kept Heim in the system and saved a couple million

So because he got an injury, it was a bad decision at the time? You know what they say about hindsight? It was a good move, this is just an unfortunate unexpected thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So because he got an injury, it was a bad decision at the time? You know what they say about hindsight? It was a good move, this is just an unfortunate unexpected thing.

I can see it being a bad decision if the Orioles knew of his arm issue and decided to trade for him anyway a la the Michael Morse trade a couple years back.

That said, hopefully it's just a minor issue and he can turn it around. Would suck for him to get healthy but not have the same swing or power behind his swing prior to the injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see it being a bad decision if the Orioles knew of his arm issue and decided to trade for him anyway a la the Michael Morse trade a couple years back.

That said, hopefully it's just a minor issue and he can turn it around. Would suck for him to get healthy but not have the same swing or power behind his swing prior to the injury.

I don't buy this. More likely you hope it's serious so you can trash DD again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...