Jump to content

What could you get for Brach?


Lucky_13

Recommended Posts

On 6/17/2017 at 4:17 PM, Frobby said:

I'll take Hader's potential career over Tyler Wilson's any day.    

Yeah, Hader is still a highly regarded prospect.  Wilson... never was except by a few O's fans.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, weams said:

If we did, Fedde and Soto.

Finally someone not under rating him. I didn't bump the thread to even talk about trading Brach. I was pointing out how spoiled we are to have an elite back end bullpen. Brach is a beast. 

He might be an All Star again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Finally someone not under rating him. I didn't bump the thread to even talk about trading Brach. I was pointing out how spoiled we are to have an elite back end bullpen. Brach is a beast. 

He might be an All Star again. 

He's very good.   His few poor outings came during a period where he was being used extremely heavily, out of necessity due to the number of narrow leads we were protecting and the absences of Britton and O'Day.    The one positive of our lousy play from mid-May to mid-June is that we didn't need to call on Brach very often, and his innings are now at normal levels, and hopefully will stay that way with O'Day back and Britton on the way shortly.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way:

Brach - 1 ER in his last 15.1 IP (back to May 19)

Givens - 1 ER in his last 15.2 IP (back to May 20)

O'Day - 3 ER in his last 16.0 IP (back to May 1).

The bullpen as a whole has allowed 1 run in 14.1 innings over the last five games.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Finally someone not under rating him. I didn't bump the thread to even talk about trading Brach. I was pointing out how spoiled we are to have an elite back end bullpen. Brach is a beast. 

He might be an All Star again. 

Who underrated Brach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

By the way:

Brach - 1 ER in his last 15.1 IP (back to May 19)

Givens - 1 ER in his last 15.2 IP (back to May 20)

O'Day - 3 ER in his last 16.0 IP (back to May 1).

The bullpen as a whole has allowed 1 run in 14.1 innings over the last five games.    

Trade them all. ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 99ct said:

I want to trade him. Not because I undervalue him, but rather because I value him highly and think we could get a nice haul for him. The Nats could have swept the Cubs but ended up splitting the four game series due to late bullpen collapses. Seems like an ominous sign for their 2017 playoff run. Blake Treinen, who couldn't close out a 2 run lead with 2 outs, is now sporting an ERA over 6. If I were them, I'd pay almost anything for Brach/Britton/Givens

Yes I want to deal guys who can bring back elite talent, that's why I don't mention Hardy or Wright. Brach should bring back something purdy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, pastorfan said:

Brach is worth more now, because how relievers are valued has changed dramatically in recent years....and BTW, while we are a perfect match for the Nats, Angelos will never make a deal with them.

The Nats may be desperate, Turner out and the bullpen just blew another save. If we can get Robles, even the Duq & Peter would have to sing to the heavens and accept. I'd hope. The value of Brach has gone up this week with an injury in SF and another Nats meltdown. Peter is a stubborn old fart but this is the perfect time to take advantage of the Nats strengths. Unfortunately Taylor is becoming too good to trade away. I've wanted him in Baltimore for a couple years, that power, D, speed combination is something else...he's their Mancini, having success by default. They didn't want him to get ABs but they've backed in to seeing how gifted he is and how bad the trade for Eaton really was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, weams said:

If we did, Fedde and Soto.

Do you realize how much you're asking for? A top 50 MLB ready arm and one of the elite collection of MLB's young hitters (Eloy JIminez, Vlad Jr, Ronald Acuna, Juan Soto) just isn't going to happen. There's a very significant chance that Soto finishes this year top 20. Mid relievers do not draw that kind of return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tryptamine said:

Do you realize how much you're asking for? A top 50 MLB ready arm and one of the elite collection of MLB's young hitters (Eloy JIminez, Vlad Jr, Ronald Acuna, Juan Soto) just isn't going to happen. There's a very significant chance that Soto finishes this year top 20. Mid relievers do not draw that kind of return.

It's what a good closer will cost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tryptamine said:

Do you realize how much you're asking for? A top 50 MLB ready arm and one of the elite collection of MLB's young hitters (Eloy JIminez, Vlad Jr, Ronald Acuna, Juan Soto) just isn't going to happen. There's a very significant chance that Soto finishes this year top 20. Mid relievers do not draw that kind of return.

You don;t understand how desperate they are for that type of arm as well. They did not advance in a playoff. Ever. They are not the Cubs. They wish to beat the Cubs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

Do you realize how much you're asking for? A top 50 MLB ready arm and one of the elite collection of MLB's young hitters (Eloy JIminez, Vlad Jr, Ronald Acuna, Juan Soto) just isn't going to happen. There's a very significant chance that Soto finishes this year top 20. Mid relievers do not draw that kind of return.

Oh, you still think of him as a mid reliever. I can see your point if that was your view. He's elite backend at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weams said:

You don;t understand how desperate they are for that type of arm as well. They did not advance in a playoff. Ever. They are not the Cubs. They wish to beat the Cubs. 

So you think they're going to pay more than what the Indians paid for Miller and get a lesser pitcher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tryptamine said:

So you think they're going to pay more than what the Indians paid for Miller and get a lesser pitcher?

Miller had a big contract. Some thought with his injury history, a risky one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...