Jump to content

Maikel Franco?


Lucky_13

Recommended Posts

I would at least kick the tires on this.  Would be good to get a talented, cost-controlled young player at a premium position at the low point of their value.  

I thought it was pretty odd that the article mentioned Philadelphia as a possible landing spot for Manny Machado.  Surely that is a pipe dream--if Manny wants out of Baltimore he is going to want to go to a contending team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I would at least kick the tires on this.  Would be good to get a talented, cost-controlled young player at a premium position at the low point of their value.  

I thought it was pretty odd that the article mentioned Philadelphia as a possible landing spot for Manny Machado.  Surely that is a pipe dream--if Manny wants out of Baltimore he is going to want to go to a contending team.  

BOS MFY MIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I would at least kick the tires on this.  Would be good to get a talented, cost-controlled young player at a premium position at the low point of their value.  

I thought it was pretty odd that the article mentioned Philadelphia as a possible landing spot for Manny Machado.  Surely that is a pipe dream--if Manny wants out of Baltimore he is going to want to go to a contending team.  

My thoughts exactly. Gives us a young talented infield if he reverts to form. Have to imagine he'd hit well in AL East Stadiums. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MDtransplant757 said:

Boston will sign a guy this offseason

Yankees have one of the best 3B prospects a year away. 

Miami, contenders. Pick one. 

Manny could make the difference for BOS and the post season this year and next and they have what we want 3B, SP SS prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Finisher said:

.283 OBP this year. .305 last year.

Elite contact rates.  Sustainable low K% (13% this year) .227 Babip this year despite a 50% medium hard hit ball rate.

Something doesn't add up, but it will, and the team that has him when it does will be very happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...