Jump to content

Should the Orioles get Danny Farquhar?


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

There's only like 5 teams in front of us in the AL waiver wire. If we want this guy we just have to claim him. I remember we beat him earlier in the year. The guy has good stuff and a decent track record. He doesn't have options but the rotation is at least giving us innings. This pen would look real nice, 

Britton, Brach, Givens, O'day, Bleier, Farquhar, Asher

We could always go with a 3 man bench for a fresh arm if need be. It's not like Gentry is adding so much value. Dude is hitting .100 and that's to optimize his stats by avoiding RHP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Diehard_O's_Fan said:

Danny Farquhar is now available. Should the Orioles go after him?

Rays designated him. Would he be really worth it for the O's to pickup? As someone said the O's don't need relief pitchers. But this player is the kind DD would sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

Relief pitchers are not the O's problem.  Its starters.

I agree. Though if we are going to look into trading any or all of O'Day, Brittan, or Brach then we might want to begin to stock up on arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aglets said:

So far this year:

4.24 ERA

1.41 WHIP

8.7 K per 9

34 IP

Barely above replacement level.

I guess he is better than Crichton who is apparently on our 25 man roster.....

This. He's definitely an upgrade over a guy like Crichton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a money saving move by TB after adding a 2 million in salary for Hecchavarria sp?  They seem to be hoping someone picks up the 1 million or so left on this guy for the season.  I think he'd make a good B squad reliever that could also pitch in the middle innings when we have leads and the SP is knocked out after 5.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Aglets said:

So far this year:

4.24 ERA

1.41 WHIP

8.7 K per 9

34 IP

Barely above replacement level.

I guess he is better than Crichton who is apparently on our 25 man roster.....

Crichton is on our roster for about 144 more hours until Britton is activated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...